Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Ghost Inspector vs WebdriverIO: What are the differences?
## Introduction
1. **Automation Tools**: Ghost Inspector is a cloud-based automated testing tool that focuses on end-to-end testing, while WebdriverIO is a test automation framework that allows for extensive browser automation and testing capabilities.
2. **Integration**: Ghost Inspector provides easy integration with popular project management and communication tools such as Slack, Trello, and Jira, allowing for seamless workflow collaborations. In contrast, WebdriverIO offers robust integration with various third-party tools and libraries to enhance test automation processes.
3. **Languages Supported**: Ghost Inspector primarily supports testing in JavaScript, whereas WebdriverIO supports multiple programming languages like JavaScript, Python, Ruby, and Java, providing flexibility for developers to choose their preferred language for automation.
4. **Testing Scope**: Ghost Inspector is more suited for UI testing and end-to-end testing scenarios due to its focus on visual regression testing, whereas WebdriverIO is a versatile tool capable of handling a wide range of testing types, including unit testing, integration testing, and API testing.
5. **Community Support**: WebdriverIO has a strong community of users and contributors that actively share knowledge, resources, and plugins, making it easier for developers to find solutions and guidance for automation challenges compared to Ghost Inspector.
6. **Execution Environment**: Ghost Inspector allows testers to run tests directly in the cloud without requiring a local setup, making it convenient for distributed teams and remote testers. On the other hand, WebdriverIO supports both cloud execution and local execution, providing more flexibility in choosing the execution environment based on specific project requirements.
In Summary, Ghost Inspector and WebdriverIO differ in terms of focus on end-to-end testing, integration capabilities, language support, testing scope, community support, and execution environments.
we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................
with the help of selenium we can automate react js for functional testing
Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!
You should also definitely look into Playwright, which is a new automation tool from Microsoft building on top of the Puppeteer experience and trying to bring this experience in the cross browser space - very exciting project. Great team. Also CodeceptJS as already Playwright support which at a ton of valuable features on top of Playwright, give it a go!
I'm also looking for the same, FE: React & BE: NodeJS. Cypress won't help as it lacks cross-browser testing, it doesn't support all the browsers. I'm still investigating it, but looks like WebdriverIO may fulfil what I'm looking for - Cross-browser testing, integration with CI/CD, running it as a docker service, good support on assertions & reporting of test results. Let me know if you found any information on any of the above mentioned points.
Hi Esther, if you really need cross OS and cross device automation Cypress wont help, with WebdriverIO you can do it … and check out CodeceptJS, which is a wrapper around several frameworks (like WebdriverIO) and will support future players (currently for example upcoming Playwright) as well.
Pros of Ghost Inspector
- No code required3
- Runscope integration3
- Simple test editor3
- Screenshot comparison2
- Videos of every test run2
- Primarily focus on functional testing1
- Easy to use API enables remote control1
- Data-Driven testing1
- Minimal effort to migrate to another tool like Selenium1
- Partials and Variables enable fast test creation1
- 30-40 in-parallel tests for cheap1
- Detailed Documentation1
- Supports end to end testing with Runscope1
- Extensive Integrations available1
- Scheduling tests0
- Licensed but cheaper compared to other tools0
- Email notification and Alerts0
Pros of WebdriverIO
- Various integrations to vendors like Sauce Labs11
- Open Source10
- Great community8
- Easy to setup7
- Best solution for broad browser support4
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Ghost Inspector
- Support Cross-device testing (device, web)1
- Load & Performance testing0
- Flash Support inside browser0
Cons of WebdriverIO
- High maintenance8
