Ghost Inspector vs WebdriverIO

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Ghost Inspector

65
117
+ 1
22
WebdriverIO

349
507
+ 1
40
Add tool

Ghost Inspector vs WebdriverIO: What are the differences?

## Introduction

1. **Automation Tools**: Ghost Inspector is a cloud-based automated testing tool that focuses on end-to-end testing, while WebdriverIO is a test automation framework that allows for extensive browser automation and testing capabilities.
2. **Integration**: Ghost Inspector provides easy integration with popular project management and communication tools such as Slack, Trello, and Jira, allowing for seamless workflow collaborations. In contrast, WebdriverIO offers robust integration with various third-party tools and libraries to enhance test automation processes.
3. **Languages Supported**: Ghost Inspector primarily supports testing in JavaScript, whereas WebdriverIO supports multiple programming languages like JavaScript, Python, Ruby, and Java, providing flexibility for developers to choose their preferred language for automation.
4. **Testing Scope**: Ghost Inspector is more suited for UI testing and end-to-end testing scenarios due to its focus on visual regression testing, whereas WebdriverIO is a versatile tool capable of handling a wide range of testing types, including unit testing, integration testing, and API testing.
5. **Community Support**: WebdriverIO has a strong community of users and contributors that actively share knowledge, resources, and plugins, making it easier for developers to find solutions and guidance for automation challenges compared to Ghost Inspector.
6. **Execution Environment**: Ghost Inspector allows testers to run tests directly in the cloud without requiring a local setup, making it convenient for distributed teams and remote testers. On the other hand, WebdriverIO supports both cloud execution and local execution, providing more flexibility in choosing the execution environment based on specific project requirements.

In Summary, Ghost Inspector and WebdriverIO differ in terms of focus on end-to-end testing, integration capabilities, language support, testing scope, community support, and execution environments.
Advice on Ghost Inspector and WebdriverIO
Needs advice
on
JestJestSeleniumSelenium
and
WebdriverIOWebdriverIO
in

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

See more
Replies (1)
Prashanth Marappa
Senior Software Engineer at Mphasis · | 1 upvotes · 233.4K views
Recommends
on
SeleniumSelenium

with the help of selenium we can automate react js for functional testing

See more
Needs advice
on
CypressCypressSelenideSelenide
and
WebdriverIOWebdriverIO

Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!

See more
Replies (3)
Recommends
on
PlaywrightPlaywright

You should also definitely look into Playwright, which is a new automation tool from Microsoft building on top of the Puppeteer experience and trying to bring this experience in the cross browser space - very exciting project. Great team. Also CodeceptJS as already Playwright support which at a ton of valuable features on top of Playwright, give it a go!

See more
Jinesh Khimsaria
Test Automation Specialist at Personal · | 3 upvotes · 78.1K views
Recommends
on
WebdriverIOWebdriverIO

I'm also looking for the same, FE: React & BE: NodeJS. Cypress won't help as it lacks cross-browser testing, it doesn't support all the browsers. I'm still investigating it, but looks like WebdriverIO may fulfil what I'm looking for - Cross-browser testing, integration with CI/CD, running it as a docker service, good support on assertions & reporting of test results. Let me know if you found any information on any of the above mentioned points.

See more
Recommends
on
CodeceptJSCodeceptJS

Hi Esther, if you really need cross OS and cross device automation Cypress wont help, with WebdriverIO you can do it … and check out CodeceptJS, which is a wrapper around several frameworks (like WebdriverIO) and will support future players (currently for example upcoming Playwright) as well.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Ghost Inspector
Pros of WebdriverIO
  • 3
    No code required
  • 3
    Runscope integration
  • 3
    Simple test editor
  • 2
    Screenshot comparison
  • 2
    Videos of every test run
  • 1
    Primarily focus on functional testing
  • 1
    Easy to use API enables remote control
  • 1
    Data-Driven testing
  • 1
    Minimal effort to migrate to another tool like Selenium
  • 1
    Partials and Variables enable fast test creation
  • 1
    30-40 in-parallel tests for cheap
  • 1
    Detailed Documentation
  • 1
    Supports end to end testing with Runscope
  • 1
    Extensive Integrations available
  • 0
    Scheduling tests
  • 0
    Licensed but cheaper compared to other tools
  • 0
    Email notification and Alerts
  • 11
    Various integrations to vendors like Sauce Labs
  • 10
    Open Source
  • 8
    Great community
  • 7
    Easy to setup
  • 4
    Best solution for broad browser support

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Ghost Inspector
Cons of WebdriverIO
  • 1
    Support Cross-device testing (device, web)
  • 0
    Load & Performance testing
  • 0
    Flash Support inside browser
  • 8
    High maintenance

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Ghost Inspector?

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

What is WebdriverIO?

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Ghost Inspector?
What companies use WebdriverIO?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Ghost Inspector?
What tools integrate with WebdriverIO?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Ghost Inspector and WebdriverIO?
BrowserStack
BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.
Selenium
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
Cypress
Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
Git
Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
GitHub
GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
See all alternatives