Ghost Inspector vs Wallaby.js

Overview

Ghost Inspector

Stacks64

Followers117

Votes22

Wallaby.js

Stacks10

Followers18

Votes0

Wallaby.js vs Ghost Inspector: What are the differences?

What is Wallaby.js? Intelligent test runner for JavaScript with real-time code coverage and deep editor integration. It is an intelligent test runner for JavaScript that continuously runs your tests. It reports code coverage and other results directly to your code editor immediately as you change your code. Wallaby.js uses various tricks to run your tests as fast as possible, such as dependency analysis to only execute tests affected by your code changes and parallel test execution. It provides a huge productivity boost whether you are doing TDD/BDD or using any other approach.

What is Ghost Inspector? Catch website bugs and regressions before they cost you. It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Wallaby.js and Ghost Inspector can be categorized as "Browser Testing" tools.

Binary.com, Twig World, and Vestiaire Collective are some of the popular companies that use Ghost Inspector, whereas Wallaby.js is used by Covve, Shelf, and Wuilt. Ghost Inspector has a broader approval, being mentioned in 21 company stacks & 16 developers stacks; compared to Wallaby.js, which is listed in 3 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Ghost Inspector	Wallaby.js
It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.	It is an intelligent test runner for JavaScript that continuously runs your tests. It reports code coverage and other results directly to your code editor immediately as you change your code.
Automated browser testing from the cloud;Chrome extension for test recording;GUI editor for test building and editing;Screenshot comparison for catching display issues;API for integration into your CI setup;Selenium test export option	Continuous Testing and TDD/BDD for JavaScript, CoffeeScript and TypeScript, Webpack, Browserify, ES6, ES7, node.js, Jest
Statistics
Stacks 64	Stacks 10
Followers 117	Followers 18
Votes 22	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 No code required 3 Simple test editor 3 Runscope integration 2 Videos of every test run 2 Screenshot comparison Cons 1 Support Cross-device testing (device, web) 0 Flash Support inside browser 0 Load & Performance testing	No community feedback yet
Integrations
PagerDuty Runscope GitHub Heroku CircleCI Travis CI AWS CodePipeline Jenkins Slack HipChat	QUnit Jest Jasmine Mocha

What are some alternatives to Ghost Inspector, Wallaby.js?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Zapier

Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.

Related Comparisons

Ghost Inspector vs Wallaby.js