Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Ghost Inspector

65
115
+ 1
22
Playwright

452
528
+ 1
76
Add tool

Ghost Inspector vs Playwright: What are the differences?

Ghost Inspector vs Playwright

Ghost Inspector and Playwright are both automation testing tools that are widely used in the software development industry. While both tools serve the purpose of automating the testing process, they have certain key differences that distinguish them from each other.

  1. Browser Support: Ghost Inspector supports a limited number of browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer. On the other hand, Playwright offers cross-browser support, allowing developers to test their applications on a variety of browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. This makes Playwright a more versatile choice for testing applications across different browser environments.

  2. Programming Language: Ghost Inspector uses JavaScript as its primary programming language for writing tests. On the contrary, Playwright supports multiple programming languages such as JavaScript, TypeScript, and Python. This gives developers the flexibility to choose the language they are most comfortable with for writing tests.

  3. Synchronization: Ghost Inspector provides built-in synchronization capabilities, which ensures that tests wait for page elements to be loaded before performing actions. Playwright, on the other hand, requires the use of explicit waits in the test code to synchronize actions. This allows developers to have greater control over the timing and synchronization of their tests.

  4. Test Execution: Ghost Inspector mainly runs tests in the cloud, which means that the tests are executed on Ghost Inspector’s servers. Playwright, on the other hand, allows tests to be executed both locally and in the cloud. This gives developers the flexibility to choose the execution environment that best suits their requirements.

  5. Accessibility Testing: Ghost Inspector provides built-in accessibility testing capabilities, allowing developers to test their applications for compliance with accessibility standards. Playwright, however, does not have native accessibility testing features. To perform accessibility testing with Playwright, developers need to rely on external tools or libraries.

  6. Customization and Extensibility: Ghost Inspector offers limited customization options, and it is mainly focused on providing a simple and easy-to-use testing framework. Playwright, in contrast, provides a higher level of customization and extensibility. It allows developers to modify and extend the functionality of the test framework to suit their specific needs.

In summary, Ghost Inspector and Playwright differ in terms of browser support, programming language compatibility, synchronization, test execution options, built-in accessibility testing capabilities, and customization/extensibility features. Selecting the right tool depends on the specific needs and requirements of the testing project.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Ghost Inspector
Pros of Playwright
  • 3
    No code required
  • 3
    Runscope integration
  • 3
    Simple test editor
  • 2
    Screenshot comparison
  • 2
    Videos of every test run
  • 1
    Primarily focus on functional testing
  • 1
    Easy to use API enables remote control
  • 1
    Data-Driven testing
  • 1
    Minimal effort to migrate to another tool like Selenium
  • 1
    Partials and Variables enable fast test creation
  • 1
    30-40 in-parallel tests for cheap
  • 1
    Detailed Documentation
  • 1
    Supports end to end testing with Runscope
  • 1
    Extensive Integrations available
  • 0
    Scheduling tests
  • 0
    Licensed but cheaper compared to other tools
  • 0
    Email notification and Alerts
  • 13
    Cross browser
  • 10
    Open source
  • 9
    Test Runner with Playwright/test
  • 7
    Promise based
  • 7
    Well documented
  • 5
    Integrate your POMs as extensible fixtures
  • 5
    Execute tests in parallel
  • 5
    API Testing
  • 4
    Python Support
  • 4
    Capture videos, screenshots and other artifacts on fail
  • 3
    Inbuild reporters html,line,dot,json
  • 3
    Context isolation
  • 1
    Fastest

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Ghost Inspector
Cons of Playwright
  • 0
    Load & Performance testing
  • 0
    Flash Support inside browser
  • 0
    Support Cross-device testing (device, web)
  • 12
    Less help
  • 3
    Node based
  • 2
    Does not execute outside of browser

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Ghost Inspector?

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

What is Playwright?

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Ghost Inspector?
What companies use Playwright?
See which teams inside your own company are using Ghost Inspector or Playwright.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Ghost Inspector?
What tools integrate with Playwright?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Ghost Inspector and Playwright?
BrowserStack
BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.
Selenium
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
Cypress
Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
Jest
Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.
Mocha
Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.
See all alternatives