StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. GeoServer vs Jetty

GeoServer vs Jetty

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jetty
Jetty
Stacks510
Followers311
Votes47
GeoServer
GeoServer
Stacks91
Followers82
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.2K
Forks2.3K

GeoServer vs Jetty: What are the differences?

Introduction

GeoServer and Jetty are two popular software systems used in the field of web mapping and web server hosting respectively. While both serve different purposes, they have some key differences that set them apart. In the following paragraphs, we will discuss these differences in detail.

  1. Supported Protocols: One key difference between GeoServer and Jetty is the protocols they support. GeoServer is primarily designed to serve geospatial data, and hence it supports protocols like Web Map Service (WMS), Web Feature Service (WFS), and Web Coverage Service (WCS). On the other hand, Jetty is a web server that supports various standard protocols like HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and WebSocket.

  2. Main Functionality: GeoServer primarily focuses on serving geospatial data over the web. It supports various data formats, including shapefiles, geodatabases, and raster data. It also offers advanced features like data styling, data transformations, and spatial analysis. Jetty, on the other hand, is a Java-based web server that is widely used for hosting websites and web applications. It provides essential web server functionalities like handling HTTP requests, managing web resources, and enabling servlets.

  3. Community Support: GeoServer is backed by a strong open-source community that actively contributes to its development and provides support through mailing lists, forums, and documentation. It has a large user base and a wide range of plugins and extensions available. Jetty, being an established and widely used web server, also has a supportive community, but it may not be as extensive as GeoServer's community.

  4. Configuration and Deployment: In terms of configuration and deployment, GeoServer relies on a web-based administration interface that allows users to configure data sources, publish layers, and manage security settings. It provides a user-friendly interface for managing geospatial data and services. Jetty, on the other hand, is a standalone web server that can be configured through XML configuration files. It provides more flexibility in terms of customization and deployment options.

  5. Scalability and Performance: GeoServer is designed to handle large volumes of geospatial data and can be scaled to serve high-traffic websites. It provides various caching mechanisms, including tile caching, which helps in improving performance. Jetty, being a lightweight web server, is known for its high-performance and low resource utilization. It can handle a large number of concurrent connections and is suitable for small to medium-scale web applications.

In summary, GeoServer and Jetty differ in terms of supported protocols, main functionality, community support, configuration and deployment options, and scalability and performance. While GeoServer is specifically designed for serving geospatial data, Jetty is a versatile web server suitable for hosting websites and web applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Jetty
Jetty
GeoServer
GeoServer

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

It is developed, tested, and supported as community-driven project by a diverse group of individuals and organizations. It is designed for interoperability, it publishes data from any major spatial data source using open standards.

Full-featured and standards-based; Open source and commercially usable; Flexible and extensible; Small footprint; Embeddable; Asynchronous; Enterprise scalable; Dual licensed under Apache and Eclipse
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
4.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.3K
Stacks
510
Stacks
91
Followers
311
Followers
82
Votes
47
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Lightweight
  • 10
    Embeddable
  • 10
    Very fast
  • 6
    Scalable
  • 6
    Very thin
Cons
  • 0
    Student
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Jetty, GeoServer?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase