StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Server Configuration And Automation
  5. GeoEngineer vs Metamon vs Terraform

GeoEngineer vs Metamon vs Terraform

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Terraform
Terraform
Stacks22.9K
Followers14.7K
Votes344
GitHub Stars47.0K
Forks10.1K
Metamon
Metamon
Stacks0
Followers3
Votes0
GitHub Stars337
Forks15
GeoEngineer
GeoEngineer
Stacks52
Followers65
Votes0
GitHub Stars401
Forks54

GeoEngineer vs Metamon vs Terraform: What are the differences?

Introduction

GeoEngineer, Metamon, and Terraform are all Infrastructure as Code (IaC) tools used for managing infrastructure configurations.

  1. Configuration Language: GeoEngineer uses Ruby as its configuration language, making it more flexible for developers who are comfortable with Ruby programming. Metamon and Terraform, on the other hand, use their own declarative configuration languages specific to the tool, which may require users to learn new syntax.

  2. State Management: GeoEngineer stores its state in local files or in a cloud storage bucket, providing more control and customization options for storing sensitive information. Metamon and Terraform both store state files remotely by default, which may raise security concerns for some users due to the nature of cloud storage.

  3. Community Support: Terraform has a large and active community with extensive documentation and a wide range of community-created modules, making it easier for users to find solutions to common problems. GeoEngineer and Metamon, being relatively newer tools, have smaller communities with fewer resources available, which may result in longer troubleshooting times.

  4. Customizability: GeoEngineer provides a high level of customization through its flexible Ruby codebase, allowing users to create complex infrastructure configurations. Metamon and Terraform have more limitations in terms of customization, as users are bound by the constraints of their respective configuration languages.

  5. Plugin Ecosystem: Terraform has a robust ecosystem of plugins and providers that enable users to integrate with various cloud providers and services seamlessly. GeoEngineer and Metamon have fewer third-party plugins and providers available, which may limit the range of services they can interact with directly.

  6. Maturity and Stability: Terraform is a more mature tool with a longer track record of stability and reliability in production environments. GeoEngineer and Metamon, being newer tools, may still have some bugs and issues that need to be ironed out, making them potentially riskier choices for critical infrastructure configurations.

In Summary, GeoEngineer, Metamon, and Terraform each have their strengths and weaknesses in areas such as configuration language, state management, community support, customizability, plugin ecosystem, and maturity/stability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Terraform
Terraform
Metamon
Metamon
GeoEngineer
GeoEngineer

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Metamon is a Vagrantfile combined with a set of Ansible Playbooks which can be used to quickly start a new Django project. Although Metamon is easily extensible by adding new Ansible roles, it is a better fit for people who use Django + Gunicorn + Nginx + PostgreSQL.

GeoEngineer uses Terraform to plan and execute changes, so the DSL to describe resources is similar to Terraform's. GeoEngineer's DSL also provides programming and object oriented features like inheritance, abstraction, branching and looping.

Infrastructure as Code: Infrastructure is described using a high-level configuration syntax. This allows a blueprint of your datacenter to be versioned and treated as you would any other code. Additionally, infrastructure can be shared and re-used.;Execution Plans: Terraform has a "planning" step where it generates an execution plan. The execution plan shows what Terraform will do when you call apply. This lets you avoid any surprises when Terraform manipulates infrastructure.;Resource Graph: Terraform builds a graph of all your resources, and parallelizes the creation and modification of any non-dependent resources. Because of this, Terraform builds infrastructure as efficiently as possible, and operators get insight into dependencies in their infrastructure.;Change Automation: Complex changesets can be applied to your infrastructure with minimal human interaction. With the previously mentioned execution plan and resource graph, you know exactly what Terraform will change and in what order, avoiding many possible human errors
Create an Ubuntu 14.04 machine.;Set-up basic Operating system dependencies.;Set-up a Virtualenv and automatically install dependencies.;Set-up Supervisor, PostgreSQL 9.3, Gunicorn and Nginx.;Start a new Django project if it's needed.;Automatically activate a virtualenv and cd to the project's directory when logging in during development.;Use separate requirements files for faster deploys.;Separate settings file for unit testing with coverage and customized settings to make testing faster.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
47.0K
GitHub Stars
337
GitHub Stars
401
GitHub Forks
10.1K
GitHub Forks
15
GitHub Forks
54
Stacks
22.9K
Stacks
0
Stacks
52
Followers
14.7K
Followers
3
Followers
65
Votes
344
Votes
0
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 121
    Infrastructure as code
  • 73
    Declarative syntax
  • 45
    Planning
  • 28
    Simple
  • 24
    Parallelism
Cons
  • 1
    Doesn't have full support to GKE
No community feedback yet
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Heroku
Heroku
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
CloudFlare
CloudFlare
DNSimple
DNSimple
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Consul
Consul
Equinix Metal
Equinix Metal
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
OpenStack
OpenStack
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Ansible
Ansible
Django
Django
Vagrant
Vagrant
VirtualBox
VirtualBox
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to Terraform, Metamon, GeoEngineer?

Ansible

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Capistrano

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Salt

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

AWS CloudFormation

AWS CloudFormation

You can use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create your own templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run your application. You don’t need to figure out the order in which AWS services need to be provisioned or the subtleties of how to make those dependencies work.

Fabric

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

AWS OpsWorks

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

Packer

Packer

Packer automates the creation of any type of machine image. It embraces modern configuration management by encouraging you to use automated scripts to install and configure the software within your Packer-made images.

Scalr

Scalr

Scalr is a remote state & operations backend for Terraform with access controls, policy as code, and many quality of life features.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana