Geb vs Selenium

Overview

Selenium

Stacks16.2K

Followers12.6K

Votes527

GitHub Stars33.6K

Forks8.6K

Geb

Stacks19

Followers27

Votes0

Geb vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Introduction

Geb and Selenium are both popular automation testing frameworks used for web application testing. However, there are key differences between the two.

Architecture: Geb is built on top of Selenium and WebDriver and provides a more concise and expressive DSL (Domain-specific Language) for automating web interactions. On the other hand, Selenium is a standalone framework that requires additional programming languages and libraries to create automation scripts.
Syntax and Expressiveness: Geb offers a simplified and expressive syntax for test automation, allowing testers to write more readable and maintainable code. It provides a higher-level API for interacting with web elements, making it easier to write complex interactions with less code. In contrast, Selenium requires more verbose and low-level programming, making test scripts longer and harder to comprehend.
Page Object Pattern Integration: Geb has built-in support for the Page Object pattern, which promotes code modularity and reusability. It allows testers to define reusable components, such as page classes and modules, enabling better organization and maintenance of test scripts. Selenium, on the other hand, does not enforce the use of the Page Object pattern, and testers need to manually implement it.
Groovy Language Integration: Geb is implemented in Groovy and leverages the power and flexibility of the Groovy programming language. It allows testers to take advantage of Groovy's concise syntax, powerful features, and seamlessly integrate with existing Java code. Selenium, on the other hand, primarily supports languages like Java, C#, and Python, limiting the flexibility and expressiveness of the test scripts.
CSS and jQuery Selectors: Geb provides built-in support for CSS and jQuery selectors, allowing testers to locate web elements with ease. It offers an intuitive syntax for querying elements based on CSS or jQuery-like expressions, simplifying the element identification process. Selenium, on the other hand, primarily relies on XPath or manual DOM traversal for element identification, which can be more complex and error-prone.
Browser Automation: Geb allows testers to automate multiple browsers concurrently, making it easier to execute cross-browser testing. It provides a clear and unified API for managing different browser instances and switching between them. Selenium also supports multiple browsers, but managing them requires more manual configuration and setup.

In summary, Geb offers a more expressive and simplified syntax, built-in support for the Page Object pattern, seamless integration with Groovy, the ability to use CSS and jQuery selectors, and easier management of multiple browsers compared to Selenium.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Selenium, Geb

Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium	Geb
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.	It brings together the power of WebDriver, the elegance of jQuery content selection, the robustness of Page Object modelling and the expressiveness of the Groovy language.It can be used for scripting
-	Groovy browser automation; Web Testing; Screen Scraping
Statistics
GitHub Stars 33.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 8.6K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 16.2K	Stacks 19
Followers 12.6K	Followers 27
Votes 527	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 177 Automates browsers 154 Testing 101 Essential tool for running test automation 24 Record-Playback 24 Remote Control Cons 8 Flaky tests 4 Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui) 2 Update browser drivers	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Apache Maven Java Gradle

What are some alternatives to Selenium, Geb?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Related Comparisons

Geb vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Introduction

Geb and Selenium are both popular automation testing frameworks used for web application testing. However, there are key differences between the two.

Architecture: Geb is built on top of Selenium and WebDriver and provides a more concise and expressive DSL (Domain-specific Language) for automating web interactions. On the other hand, Selenium is a standalone framework that requires additional programming languages and libraries to create automation scripts.
Syntax and Expressiveness: Geb offers a simplified and expressive syntax for test automation, allowing testers to write more readable and maintainable code. It provides a higher-level API for interacting with web elements, making it easier to write complex interactions with less code. In contrast, Selenium requires more verbose and low-level programming, making test scripts longer and harder to comprehend.
Page Object Pattern Integration: Geb has built-in support for the Page Object pattern, which promotes code modularity and reusability. It allows testers to define reusable components, such as page classes and modules, enabling better organization and maintenance of test scripts. Selenium, on the other hand, does not enforce the use of the Page Object pattern, and testers need to manually implement it.
Groovy Language Integration: Geb is implemented in Groovy and leverages the power and flexibility of the Groovy programming language. It allows testers to take advantage of Groovy's concise syntax, powerful features, and seamlessly integrate with existing Java code. Selenium, on the other hand, primarily supports languages like Java, C#, and Python, limiting the flexibility and expressiveness of the test scripts.
CSS and jQuery Selectors: Geb provides built-in support for CSS and jQuery selectors, allowing testers to locate web elements with ease. It offers an intuitive syntax for querying elements based on CSS or jQuery-like expressions, simplifying the element identification process. Selenium, on the other hand, primarily relies on XPath or manual DOM traversal for element identification, which can be more complex and error-prone.
Browser Automation: Geb allows testers to automate multiple browsers concurrently, making it easier to execute cross-browser testing. It provides a clear and unified API for managing different browser instances and switching between them. Selenium also supports multiple browsers, but managing them requires more manual configuration and setup.

Geb vs Selenium

Overview

Geb vs Selenium: What are the differences?