StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Static Site Generators
  5. Gatsby vs Hugo vs Punch

Gatsby vs Hugo vs Punch

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Punch
Punch
Stacks13
Followers25
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.2K
Forks100
Hugo
Hugo
Stacks1.3K
Followers1.2K
Votes206
Gatsby
Gatsby
Stacks3.3K
Followers2.4K
Votes121
GitHub Stars55.9K
Forks10.3K

Gatsby vs Hugo vs Punch: What are the differences?

# Introduction
  1. Key Differences in Static Site Generators:

Gatsby is a popular static site generator based on React, providing an interactive experience and real-time content updates, while Hugo focuses on speed and simplicity with its Go-based architecture, making it a lightning-fast choice for generating static websites. On the other hand, Punch offers an easy-to-use JSON data structure for content and allows for quick prototyping and minimal setup.

  1. Development Ecosystem:

Gatsby has a strong ecosystem with a rich set of plugins and themes, enhancing its flexibility and extensibility, while Hugo boasts an extensive collection of themes and templates directly tailored for various use cases. In contrast, Punch supports a limited number of plugins and themes due to its simplicity and lightweight nature.

  1. Learning Curve and Community Support:

Gatsby's React-based architecture may require a steep learning curve for beginners, but its large community offers extensive documentation and support resources. Hugo's simple templating language makes it beginner-friendly, and it also benefits from an active community and comprehensive documentation. Punch, with its straightforward JSON data structure, is relatively easy to grasp and has a growing community for support.

  1. Build Time:

Gatsby's build time can be longer due to its dynamic data fetching and processing during build, resulting in slower initial build times for larger projects. In contrast, Hugo's build process is exceptionally fast, making it ideal for projects that require quick deployment. Punch falls between the two, offering a balance of speed and simplicity in building static websites.

  1. Content Management System Integration:

Gatsby offers seamless integration with headless CMS like Contentful and WordPress, enabling content management and delivery through APIs. Hugo supports various content sources, including Markdown files, making it convenient for static content management. Punch lacks built-in CMS integration capabilities, requiring manual content management or integration with external services.

  1. Customization and Theming:

Gatsby allows for extensive customization with React components and GraphQL queries, enabling developers to create interactive and personalized websites. Hugo offers easy theming through its templating system, allowing developers to quickly modify the look and feel of their sites. Punch, while more limited in customization options, provides a straightforward theming process for quick branding and styling changes.

In Summary, Gatsby, Hugo, and Punch each offer unique strengths in terms of flexibility, speed, and ease of use, catering to different needs and preferences in static site generation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Punch
Punch
Hugo
Hugo
Gatsby
Gatsby

Punch allows you to use boilerplates to quickly setup a site, write minimal templates with Mustache, and create flexible site structures with inheritable layouts and partials.

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

-
Run Anywhere - Hugo is quite possibly the easiest to install software you've ever used, simply download and run. Hugo doesn't depend on administrative privileges, databases, runtimes, interpreters or external libraries. Sites built with Hugo can be deployed on S3, Github Pages, Dropbox or any web host.;Fast & Powerful - Hugo is written for speed and performance. Great care has been taken to ensure that Hugo build time is as short as possible. We're talking milliseconds to build your entire site for most setups.; Flexible - Hugo is designed to work how you do. Organize your content however you want with any URL structure. Declare your own content types. Define your own meta data in YAML, TOML or JSON.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
55.9K
GitHub Forks
100
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
10.3K
Stacks
13
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
3.3K
Followers
25
Followers
1.2K
Followers
2.4K
Votes
0
Votes
206
Votes
121
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 47
    Lightning fast
  • 29
    Single Executable
  • 26
    Easy setup
  • 24
    Great development community
  • 23
    Open source
Cons
  • 4
    No Plugins/Extensions
  • 2
    Template syntax not friendly
  • 1
    Quick builds
Pros
  • 28
    Generated websites are super fast
  • 16
    Fast
  • 15
    GraphQL
  • 10
    Progressive Web Apps generation
  • 9
    Reusable components (React)
Cons
  • 7
    No ssr
  • 4
    Documentation isn't complete.
  • 3
    Very slow builds
  • 2
    Slow builds
  • 2
    For-profit
Integrations
Markdown
Markdown
Markdown
Markdown
Golang
Golang
WordPress
WordPress
TypeScript
TypeScript
GraphCMS
GraphCMS
Babel
Babel
prismic.io
prismic.io
AWS Amplify
AWS Amplify
Glamorous
Glamorous
Prisma
Prisma
styled-components
styled-components
Emotion
Emotion

What are some alternatives to Punch, Hugo, Gatsby?

Jekyll

Jekyll

Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.

Hexo

Hexo

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

Middleman

Middleman

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

Gridsome

Gridsome

Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again.

Pelican

Pelican

Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.

DocPad

DocPad

Empower your website frontends with layouts, meta-data, pre-processors (markdown, jade, coffeescript, etc.), partials, skeletons, file watching, querying, and an amazing plugin system. DocPad will streamline your web development process allowing you to craft full-featured websites quicker than ever before.

Metalsmith

Metalsmith

In Metalsmith, all of the logic is handled by plugins. You simply chain them together. Since everything is a plugin, the core library is actually just an abstraction for manipulating a directory of files.

11ty

11ty

A simpler static site generator. An alternative to Jekyll. Written in JavaScript. Transforms a directory of templates (of varying types) into HTML. Works with HTML, Markdown, Liquid, Nunjucks, Handlebars, Mustache, EJS, Haml, Pug, and JavaScript Template Literals.

MkDocs

MkDocs

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

VuePress

VuePress

A minimalistic static site generator with a Vue-powered theming system, and a default theme optimized for writing technical documentation. It was created to support the documentation needs of Vue's own sub projects.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope