StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Java Tools
  5. Apache FreeMarker vs Jtwig

Apache FreeMarker vs Jtwig

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache FreeMarker
Apache FreeMarker
Stacks508
Followers74
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.1K
Forks270
Jtwig
Jtwig
Stacks3
Followers6
Votes0
GitHub Stars299
Forks53

Apache FreeMarker vs Jtwig: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Apache FreeMarker and Jtwig are both template engines used in web development to generate dynamic content. Despite having similar functionalities, there are key differences that distinguish them from each other.

1. **Template Language**: Apache FreeMarker uses a simple, familiar syntax that resembles HTML or XML, making it easier for developers to adopt. On the other hand, Jtwig utilizes a more advanced templating language that allows for more complex operations and dynamic content generation.
 
2. **Extensibility**: Apache FreeMarker provides limited support for extending the template language, making it less flexible when customizing functionality. In contrast, Jtwig offers a more extensive set of features for extending the template language, allowing developers to create more sophisticated templates.

3. **Compatibility**: Apache FreeMarker is compatible with older versions of Java, making it a suitable choice for legacy systems. On the contrary, Jtwig requires a newer version of Java, which may not be compatible with all environments.

4. **Performance**: Apache FreeMarker is known for its efficient rendering speed, which can be crucial for high-traffic websites. Jtwig, although efficient, may not match the performance levels of Apache FreeMarker in all scenarios.

5. **Community Support**: Apache FreeMarker has a larger community base and a longer history of development, leading to more resources and documentation available for developers. Jtwig, being a newer player in the field, may have a smaller community presence.

6. **Learning Curve**: Due to its simpler syntax and more intuitive design, Apache FreeMarker is easier for beginners to pick up and start using compared to Jtwig, which requires a steeper learning curve due to its advanced features and capabilities.

In Summary, Apache FreeMarker and Jtwig have distinct differences in their template language, extensibility, compatibility, performance, community support, and learning curve. These factors can influence the choice of template engine based on the specific requirements of a web development project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache FreeMarker
Apache FreeMarker
Jtwig
Jtwig

It is a "template engine"; a generic tool to generate text output (anything from HTML to auto generated source code) based on templates. It's a Java package, a class library for Java programmers.

It is a modern template engine for Java. It is not a syntax revolution, it uses familiar language and it is based on code islands, making it easier to read when mixed with content.

Powerful template language;Multipurpose and lightweight;Internationalization/localization-aware;XML processing capabilities;Versatile data-model
Modular by Principle ;Familiar Syntax ;Highly Configurable ;Fully Tested
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.1K
GitHub Stars
299
GitHub Forks
270
GitHub Forks
53
Stacks
508
Stacks
3
Followers
74
Followers
6
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Java
Java
Vim
Vim
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Eclipse
Eclipse
NetBeans IDE
NetBeans IDE
TextMate
TextMate
Emacs
Emacs
Gradle
Gradle
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Spring
Spring
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Java
Java
Apache Struts
Apache Struts
Grails
Grails
Apache CXF
Apache CXF

What are some alternatives to Apache FreeMarker, Jtwig?

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Quarkus

Quarkus

It tailors your application for GraalVM and HotSpot. Amazingly fast boot time, incredibly low RSS memory (not just heap size!) offering near instant scale up and high density memory utilization in container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. We use a technique we call compile time boot.

Mustache

Mustache

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

Slim Lang

Slim Lang

Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the view syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic. It started as an exercise to see how much could be removed from a standard html template (<, >, closing tags, etc...). As more people took an interest in Slim, the functionality grew and so did the flexibility of the syntax.

RactiveJS

RactiveJS

Ractive was originally created at theguardian.com to produce news applications. Ractive takes your Mustache templates and transforms them into a lightweight representation of the DOM – then when your data changes, it intelligently updates the real DOM.

EJS

EJS

It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.

MyBatis

MyBatis

It is a first class persistence framework with support for custom SQL, stored procedures and advanced mappings. It eliminates almost all of the JDBC code and manual setting of parameters and retrieval of results. It can use simple XML or Annotations for configuration and map primitives, Map interfaces and Java POJOs (Plain Old Java Objects) to database records.

Jinja

Jinja

It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase