Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Framework7 vs RubyMotion: What are the differences?
Framework7: Full Featured HTML Framework For Building iOS Apps. Framework7 - is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files! Framework7 doesn't force you to write some custom tags that will be converted by JavaScript to something else; RubyMotion: Write cross-platform native apps in Ruby. RubyMotion lets you quickly develop cross-platform native apps for iOS, Android and OS X, all using your favorite editor and the awesome Ruby language you know and love.
Framework7 and RubyMotion can be categorized as "Cross-Platform Mobile Development" tools.
"Well designed" is the primary reason why developers consider Framework7 over the competitors, whereas "Editor + Terminal workflow; minimal Xcode involvement" was stated as the key factor in picking RubyMotion.
Framework7 is an open source tool with 14.5K GitHub stars and 3.04K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Framework7's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of Framework7
- Free and open source21
- Well designed20
- Material design17
- Lots of ready-to-use ui elements, easy to customize15
- Best performance12
- Amazing documentation11
- Nice look and best performance9
- Rtl support9
- Performance and great features.9
- Easy To Learn7
- Free7
- Basic Web App Development Technique6
- Nice sample provided6
- It's feels light to use5
- Quick inital time5
- Easy to use , transit from vanilla JS5
- Doesn't require learning a JS framework5
- Easy to integrate2
Pros of RubyMotion
- Ruby Syntax6
- Editor + Terminal workflow; minimal Xcode involvement4
- Great Community4
- Fast Prototyping3
- Great gems, libraries, and frameworks3
- Leverage CocoaPods and Gradle2
- Cross Platform2
- Light Code1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Framework7
- Not suitable for high performance in PWA. desktop apps1