Framework7 vs Handlebars.js

Overview

Handlebars.js

Stacks8.3K

Followers3.2K

Votes308

Framework7

Stacks141

Followers331

Votes171

Framework7 vs Handlebars.js: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing Framework7 and Handlebars.js, it is essential to understand the key differences between the two JavaScript tools.

Template Rendering: Framework7 is primarily a mobile framework that focuses on building mobile web applications with a native look and feel, while Handlebars.js is a templating engine that simplifies the process of dynamic HTML generation. Framework7 includes pre-built UI components and animations, making it ideal for mobile app development, whereas Handlebars.js focuses on templating data to create dynamic HTML easily.
Versatility: Framework7 is specifically designed for developing mobile applications with a particular focus on iOS and Android style user interfaces, while Handlebars.js is versatile and can be used in various web development projects for templating purposes. Handlebars.js is often used in conjunction with other frameworks and libraries to enhance the overall development process.
Data Binding: Framework7 does not have built-in two-way data binding capabilities, meaning developers need to handle data updates manually, whereas Handlebars.js offers some level of data binding through its templating system. Handlebars.js allows for easier synchronization of data between the view and model, making it a preferred choice for applications requiring seamless data management.
Learning Curve: Framework7 requires a specific learning curve due to its mobile-centric features and components, making it more suitable for developers focusing on mobile app development. On the other hand, Handlebars.js is relatively easy to grasp for developers familiar with JavaScript and HTML, offering a straightforward approach to templating.
Community Support: Framework7 has a dedicated community focused on mobile app development, providing resources, plugins, and support tailored to mobile-specific requirements. Handlebars.js, being a widely-used templating engine, has a larger community base offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and third-party plugins for a broader range of web development projects.
Integration: While Framework7 is an all-in-one solution for mobile app development, it may lack seamless integration with other JavaScript libraries or frameworks due to its specialized nature. On the contrary, Handlebars.js can be easily integrated with various front-end frameworks like Angular, React, or Vue.js, providing greater flexibility in choosing the right technologies for a project.

In Summary, Framework7 specializes in mobile app development with pre-built UI components, while Handlebars.js offers versatile templating capabilities with easy integration into different web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Handlebars.js, Framework7

Asad

Software Engineer at Lisec Automation

Jun 15, 2020

Needs adviceon

.NET

Handlebars.js

@All: I am searching for the best template engine for .NET. I started looking into several template engines, including the Dotliquid, Handlebars.js, Scriban, and Razorlight. I found handlebar a bit difficult to use when using the loops and condition because you need to register for helper first. DotLiquid and Scriban were easy to use and in Razorlight I did not find the example for loops.

Can you please suggest which template engine is best suited for the use of conditional/list and looping and why? Or if anybody could provide me a resource or link where I can compare which is best?

Thanks In Advance

240k views240k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Handlebars.js	Framework7
Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.	It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.
-	iOS Specific;UI Components;Swipe Actions;Easy To Customize;Native Scrolling;Multiple Views
Statistics
Stacks 8.3K	Stacks 141
Followers 3.2K	Followers 331
Votes 308	Votes 171
Pros & Cons
Pros 106 Simple 76 Great templating language 50 Open source 36 Logicless 20 Integrates well into any codebase	Pros 21 Free and open source 20 Well designed 17 Material design 15 Lots of ready-to-use ui elements, easy to customize 12 Best performance Cons 1 Not suitable for high performance in PWA. desktop apps
Integrations
Mustache	React Vue.js Svelte

What are some alternatives to Handlebars.js, Framework7?

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Related Comparisons

Framework7 vs Handlebars.js: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing Framework7 and Handlebars.js, it is essential to understand the key differences between the two JavaScript tools.

Template Rendering: Framework7 is primarily a mobile framework that focuses on building mobile web applications with a native look and feel, while Handlebars.js is a templating engine that simplifies the process of dynamic HTML generation. Framework7 includes pre-built UI components and animations, making it ideal for mobile app development, whereas Handlebars.js focuses on templating data to create dynamic HTML easily.
Versatility: Framework7 is specifically designed for developing mobile applications with a particular focus on iOS and Android style user interfaces, while Handlebars.js is versatile and can be used in various web development projects for templating purposes. Handlebars.js is often used in conjunction with other frameworks and libraries to enhance the overall development process.
Data Binding: Framework7 does not have built-in two-way data binding capabilities, meaning developers need to handle data updates manually, whereas Handlebars.js offers some level of data binding through its templating system. Handlebars.js allows for easier synchronization of data between the view and model, making it a preferred choice for applications requiring seamless data management.
Learning Curve: Framework7 requires a specific learning curve due to its mobile-centric features and components, making it more suitable for developers focusing on mobile app development. On the other hand, Handlebars.js is relatively easy to grasp for developers familiar with JavaScript and HTML, offering a straightforward approach to templating.
Community Support: Framework7 has a dedicated community focused on mobile app development, providing resources, plugins, and support tailored to mobile-specific requirements. Handlebars.js, being a widely-used templating engine, has a larger community base offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and third-party plugins for a broader range of web development projects.
Integration: While Framework7 is an all-in-one solution for mobile app development, it may lack seamless integration with other JavaScript libraries or frameworks due to its specialized nature. On the contrary, Handlebars.js can be easily integrated with various front-end frameworks like Angular, React, or Vue.js, providing greater flexibility in choosing the right technologies for a project.

Framework7 vs Handlebars.js

Overview