Font Awesome vs Open Iconic

Overview

Open Iconic

Stacks10

Followers16

Votes0

GitHub Stars3.6K

Forks419

Font Awesome

Stacks58.4K

Followers15.4K

Votes21

GitHub Stars75.8K

Forks12.2K

Font Awesome vs Open Iconic: What are the differences?

1. Size of Icon Library: Font Awesome has a larger library of icons compared to Open Iconic. It offers over 7,500 icons, while Open Iconic has around 220 icons. This means that Font Awesome provides a wider range of icon options for designers and developers to choose from.
2. Icon Styles: Font Awesome offers both solid and regular icon styles, allowing users to select the appropriate style for their design needs. On the other hand, Open Iconic focuses solely on providing icons in a minimalist, monochrome style. This means that Font Awesome offers more versatility in terms of visual styles.
3. Accessibility Features: Font Awesome pays more attention to accessibility features by providing ARIA tags, which can enhance the accessibility of icons for users utilizing assistive technologies. Open Iconic, however, does not have built-in ARIA support. This makes Font Awesome a more accessible choice for web developers who prioritize inclusivity.
4. Community Support: Font Awesome has a larger and more active community of users compared to Open Iconic. This means that there are more resources, tutorials, and forums available for Font Awesome, making it easier for developers to find help and support when working with the icon library.
5. Integration Options: Font Awesome offers integration with popular web frameworks like Bootstrap and Foundation, making it easier to incorporate icons directly into these frameworks. Open Iconic, on the other hand, does not have the same level of integration options with popular frameworks. This can be advantageous for developers already using these frameworks as it simplifies the process of utilizing icons.
6. Licensing: Font Awesome offers both free and paid options, with its icons available under the MIT License. Open Iconic, on the other hand, is completely open source and available under the SIL Open Font License. This means that Open Iconic may be a more suitable choice for developers seeking a fully open source solution without any licensing restrictions.

In Summary, Font Awesome offers a larger icon library, multiple icon styles, better accessibility features, more community support, integration with popular frameworks, and a flexible licensing structure compared to Open Iconic.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Open Iconic	Font Awesome
It is the open source sibling of Iconic. It is a hyper-legible collection of 223 icons with a tiny footprint—ready to use with Bootstrap and Foundation.	You can get vector icons and social logos on your website with it. It is a font that's made up of symbols, icons, or pictograms that you can use in a webpage, just like a font.
Bootstrap and Foundation ready;Hyper-legible;Super small file size;All the formats you need;Open source & free	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 3.6K	GitHub Stars 75.8K
GitHub Forks 419	GitHub Forks 12.2K
Stacks 10	Stacks 58.4K
Followers 16	Followers 15.4K
Votes 0	Votes 21
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 8 CDN 7 CSS Styling 6 Open source 0 Auto-accessibility (A11y) 0 API
Integrations
No integrations available	JavaScript Bootstrap Webpack Vue.js React AngularJS Ember.js CSS 3 Sketch

What are some alternatives to Open Iconic, Font Awesome?

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

React Rainbow

It is a collection of components that will reliably help you build your application in a snap. More than 60 components built on top of React.

Chakra UI

It is a simple, modular and accessible component library that gives you all the building blocks you need to build your React applications.

MD Bootstrap

It is a UI kit built with an aim to cut the time developers need to create their websites by taking all the best features from vanilla Bootstrap and enhancing them with a distinctive design from Google.

Google Fonts

A library of 915 free licensed fonts, an interactive web directory for browsing the library, and APIs for conveniently using the fonts via CSS and Android.

ElementUI

It is not focused on Mobile development, mainly because it lacks responsiveness on mobile WebViews.

Ionicons

Premium designed icons for use in web, iOS, Android, and desktop apps. Support for SVG and web font. Completely open source and MIT licensed.

Radix Primitives

It is a low-level UI component library with a focus on accessibility, customization and developer experience. You can use these components either as the base layer of your design system, or adopt them incrementally.

Remix Icon

A set of open source neutral-style system symbols for designers and developers. Licensed under the Apache License Version 2.0.

Related Comparisons

Font Awesome vs Open Iconic: What are the differences?

1. Size of Icon Library: Font Awesome has a larger library of icons compared to Open Iconic. It offers over 7,500 icons, while Open Iconic has around 220 icons. This means that Font Awesome provides a wider range of icon options for designers and developers to choose from.
2. Icon Styles: Font Awesome offers both solid and regular icon styles, allowing users to select the appropriate style for their design needs. On the other hand, Open Iconic focuses solely on providing icons in a minimalist, monochrome style. This means that Font Awesome offers more versatility in terms of visual styles.
3. Accessibility Features: Font Awesome pays more attention to accessibility features by providing ARIA tags, which can enhance the accessibility of icons for users utilizing assistive technologies. Open Iconic, however, does not have built-in ARIA support. This makes Font Awesome a more accessible choice for web developers who prioritize inclusivity.
4. Community Support: Font Awesome has a larger and more active community of users compared to Open Iconic. This means that there are more resources, tutorials, and forums available for Font Awesome, making it easier for developers to find help and support when working with the icon library.
5. Integration Options: Font Awesome offers integration with popular web frameworks like Bootstrap and Foundation, making it easier to incorporate icons directly into these frameworks. Open Iconic, on the other hand, does not have the same level of integration options with popular frameworks. This can be advantageous for developers already using these frameworks as it simplifies the process of utilizing icons.
6. Licensing: Font Awesome offers both free and paid options, with its icons available under the MIT License. Open Iconic, on the other hand, is completely open source and available under the SIL Open Font License. This means that Open Iconic may be a more suitable choice for developers seeking a fully open source solution without any licensing restrictions.

Font Awesome vs Open Iconic

Overview