StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Flask vs Spark Framework

Flask vs Spark Framework

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Flask
Flask
Stacks19.3K
Followers16.2K
Votes60
Spark Framework
Spark Framework
Stacks39
Followers91
Votes7
GitHub Stars9.7K
Forks1.6K

Flask vs Spark Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction

Flask and Spark Framework are two popular web frameworks used for developing web applications. While both frameworks serve the purpose of building web applications, there are key differences that set them apart.

  1. Routing and URL Mapping: Flask uses a flexible routing system that allows developers to define routes with specific URL patterns and associated view functions, providing a simple and intuitive way to map URLs to functionality. On the other hand, Spark Framework uses a concise and expressive syntax for route definition, making it easier to handle complex URL mappings and perform RESTful routing.

  2. Scalability and Performance: Flask is known for its simplicity and lightweight nature, making it a good choice for small to medium-sized applications. However, it may face challenges when dealing with high load or large-scale applications, as it lacks the built-in scalability features of Spark Framework. Spark Framework, being built on top of Java and leveraging the power of the JVM, offers better performance and can handle high traffic and large datasets more efficiently.

  3. Language Support: Flask is primarily used with Python, providing extensive support for the language and its ecosystem. It allows developers to take advantage of the rich libraries and tools available in Python. Spark Framework, on the other hand, is built on Java and provides support for other JVM-based languages like Scala and Kotlin. This makes it a preferred choice for developers who are already familiar with these languages or want to leverage the strengths of the JVM ecosystem.

  4. Features and Functionality: Flask is a minimalist framework that provides only the essential features required for building web applications. It follows the "micro" philosophy, allowing developers to choose and integrate additional libraries as per their requirements. Spark Framework, on the other hand, comes bundled with a wide range of features and functionalities out of the box, including built-in support for handling HTTP requests, handling data serialization/deserialization, and managing session and authentication.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Flask has a large and active community of developers, with a vast ecosystem of plugins and extensions available to enhance its functionality. It is widely adopted and has a rich collection of resources, tutorials, and community support. Spark Framework also has an active community, but it is relatively smaller compared to Flask. However, being built on top of Java, Spark Framework can benefit from the vast Java ecosystem and the availability of various Java libraries and frameworks.

  6. Learning Curve: Flask follows a simple and minimalist approach, making it relatively easy to learn and get started with. It has a gentle learning curve, especially for developers who are already familiar with Python. On the other hand, Spark Framework, being built on Java, may have a steeper learning curve, especially for developers who are new to Java or JVM-based languages. It requires understanding Java concepts and may involve more complex configurations and setups.

In summary, Flask provides a lightweight and flexible approach for building web applications primarily using Python, while Spark Framework offers better scalability, performance, and support for other JVM-based languages like Scala and Kotlin.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Flask, Spark Framework

Kristan Eres
Kristan Eres

Senior Solutions Analyst

Jul 30, 2020

Needs adviceonDjangoDjangoPythonPythonFlaskFlask

My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.

Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?

392k views392k
Comments
Saurav
Saurav

Application Devloper at Bny Mellon

Mar 27, 2020

Needs advice

I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.

I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?

Here are some features I am looking for:

  • Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.

  • Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.

  • Support for swagger/ OpenAPI

  • Support for JSON Web Token

  • Support for test case coverage report

Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.

337k views337k
Comments
Girish
Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonNamekoNamekoRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flask
Flask
Spark Framework
Spark Framework

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

It is a simple and expressive Java/Kotlin web framework DSL built for rapid development. Its intention is to provide an alternative for Kotlin/Java developers that want to develop their web applications as expressive as possible and with minimal boilerplate.

-
Built for productivity; Lets you take full advantage of the JVM
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
9.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.6K
Stacks
19.3K
Stacks
39
Followers
16.2K
Followers
91
Votes
60
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    For it flexibility
  • 9
    Flexibilty and easy to use
  • 7
    User friendly
  • 6
    Secured
  • 5
    Unopinionated
Cons
  • 10
    Not JS
  • 7
    Context
  • 5
    Not fast
  • 1
    Don't has many module as in spring
Pros
  • 2
    Very easy to get up and running. Lovely API
  • 1
    Easy
  • 1
    Fast
  • 1
    Ideal for microservices
  • 1
    Native paralelization
Integrations
No integrations available
Kotlin
Kotlin
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to Flask, Spark Framework?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase