Apache Maven vs fastlane

Overview

Apache Maven

Stacks3.4K

Followers1.7K

Votes414

GitHub Stars4.8K

Forks2.8K

fastlane

Stacks716

Followers437

Votes74

GitHub Stars40.6K

Forks6.0K

Apache Maven vs fastlane: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code presents the key differences between Apache Maven and fastlane.

1. **Build Automation Tool:** Apache Maven is primarily a build automation tool used for Java projects, managing dependencies, and producing builds. In contrast, fastlane is a tool primarily focused on automating the build and release process for mobile applications, covering iOS, Android, and other platforms with a more specialized approach.

2. **Language Support:** Apache Maven is tailored for Java projects, providing extensive support for Java-related technologies. On the other hand, fastlane offers support for a variety of programming languages and platforms beyond Java, making it versatile for different development environments.

3. **Target Users:** Apache Maven is widely used by Java developers and projects that require Java-specific build and dependency management. In contrast, fastlane is more popular among mobile developers, especially those working on iOS and Android applications, due to its specific features for mobile app deployment.

4. **Community and Ecosystem:** Apache Maven has a large and well-established community with a plethora of plugins and extensions available for different functionalities. Fastlane, while having a smaller community compared to Maven, has a dedicated user base in the mobile development community and offers integrations with tools commonly used in mobile app development.

5. **Configuration and Customization:** Apache Maven relies heavily on XML configuration files for defining project settings and build processes, providing a structured approach to project management. Fastlane, on the other hand, emphasizes a configuration-driven approach with a focus on simplicity and ease of use, using configuration files that are tailored for mobile app workflows.

6. **Integration and Extensibility:** While both Maven and fastlane offer integration with external tools and services, Maven's extensibility is mainly through plugins that enhance its functionality for specific tasks in the Java ecosystem. Fastlane, on the other hand, has integrations with various services and tools commonly used in mobile app development, making it versatile for automating tasks beyond the build process.

In Summary, the key differences between Apache Maven and fastlane lie in their primary focus on different development environments, language support, target user base, community size, configuration approach, and integration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Maven	fastlane
Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.	fastlane lets you define and run your deployment pipelines for different environments. It helps you unify your app’s release process and automate the whole process. fastlane connects all fastlane tools and third party tools, like CocoaPods.
Simple project setup that follows best practices - get a new project or module started in seconds;Consistent usage across all projects means no ramp up time for new developers coming onto a project;Superior dependency management including automatic updating, dependency closures (also known as transitive dependencies);Able to easily work with multiple projects at the same time;A large and growing repository of libraries and metadata to use out of the box, and arrangements in place with the largest Open Source projects for real-time availability of their latest releases;Extensible, with the ability to easily write plugins in Java or scripting languages;Instant access to new features with little or no extra configuration;Ant tasks for dependency management and deployment outside of Maven	Connect all build tools together;Define multiple lanes for different needs;Jenkins Integration;Extend by adding your own build steps;Deploy from any computer;Release new app updates with the push of a button
Statistics
GitHub Stars 4.8K	GitHub Stars 40.6K
GitHub Forks 2.8K	GitHub Forks 6.0K
Stacks 3.4K	Stacks 716
Followers 1.7K	Followers 437
Votes 414	Votes 74
Pros & Cons
Pros 138 Dependency management 70 Necessary evil 60 I’d rather code my app, not my build 48 Publishing packaged artifacts 43 Convention over configuration Cons 6 Complex 1 Inconsistent buillds 0 Not many plugin-alternatives	Pros 20 Easy to use 13 Itunes connect deployment 13 Open Source 11 Incredible flexability 9 Third party integrations
Integrations
No integrations available	Testmunk GitHub Bitbucket TestFlight HockeyApp HipChat Crashlytics Travis CI Jenkins Slack

What are some alternatives to Apache Maven, fastlane?

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Bitrise

It is a Continous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) Platform as a Service (PaaS) with a main focus on mobile app development (iOS, Android). You can automate the testing and deployment of your apps with just a few clicks. When you trigger a build a Virtual Machine is assigned to host your build and your defined Workflow (series of Steps scripts) will be executed, step by step.

Buddybuild

Buddybuild ties together continuous integration, continuous delivery and an iterative feedback solution into a single, seamless platform.

Greenhouse

Greenhouse automatically builds your project for every commit you make and runs all your unit or UI tests on the emulator/simulator or on real hardware. Automatic build distribution is also supported so that your team and clients are always up to date with the latest state of your apps.

Pants

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

Codemagic

Codemagic is the developer's favourite CI/CD tool for mobile app projects. Build your Android, iOS, React Native, Ionic, Unity and Flutter projects on Codemagic.

JitPack

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

SBT

It is similar to Java's Maven and Ant. Its main features are: Native support for compiling Scala code and integrating with many Scala test frameworks.

Buck

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

Related Comparisons

Apache Maven vs fastlane: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code presents the key differences between Apache Maven and fastlane.

1. **Build Automation Tool:** Apache Maven is primarily a build automation tool used for Java projects, managing dependencies, and producing builds. In contrast, fastlane is a tool primarily focused on automating the build and release process for mobile applications, covering iOS, Android, and other platforms with a more specialized approach.

2. **Language Support:** Apache Maven is tailored for Java projects, providing extensive support for Java-related technologies. On the other hand, fastlane offers support for a variety of programming languages and platforms beyond Java, making it versatile for different development environments.

3. **Target Users:** Apache Maven is widely used by Java developers and projects that require Java-specific build and dependency management. In contrast, fastlane is more popular among mobile developers, especially those working on iOS and Android applications, due to its specific features for mobile app deployment.

4. **Community and Ecosystem:** Apache Maven has a large and well-established community with a plethora of plugins and extensions available for different functionalities. Fastlane, while having a smaller community compared to Maven, has a dedicated user base in the mobile development community and offers integrations with tools commonly used in mobile app development.

5. **Configuration and Customization:** Apache Maven relies heavily on XML configuration files for defining project settings and build processes, providing a structured approach to project management. Fastlane, on the other hand, emphasizes a configuration-driven approach with a focus on simplicity and ease of use, using configuration files that are tailored for mobile app workflows.

6. **Integration and Extensibility:** While both Maven and fastlane offer integration with external tools and services, Maven's extensibility is mainly through plugins that enhance its functionality for specific tasks in the Java ecosystem. Fastlane, on the other hand, has integrations with various services and tools commonly used in mobile app development, making it versatile for automating tasks beyond the build process.

Apache Maven vs fastlane

Overview