StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Falcon vs Slim

Falcon vs Slim

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Slim
Slim
Stacks273
Followers391
Votes152
GitHub Stars12.2K
Forks2.0K
Falcon
Falcon
Stacks84
Followers201
Votes89

Falcon vs Slim: What are the differences?

# Key Differences Between Falcon and Slim

<Introduction to Falcon and Slim>

1. **Programming Paradigm**: Falcon is a minimalist framework that follows the RESTful paradigm, focusing on building web APIs efficiently. On the other hand, Slim is a micro-framework that follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) paradigm, making it suitable for web applications with more complex structures.
2. **Performance**: Falcon is known for its high performance due to its lightweight design and lack of unnecessary features, making it ideal for handling high volumes of requests with minimal overhead. Slim, while still lightweight, may have slightly more overhead compared to Falcon because of its broader feature set catering to a wider range of web application needs.
3. **Community and Ecosystem**: Falcon has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to Slim, which has been around longer and has a larger user base. This means that Slim may provide more resources, plugins, and community support for developers working with the framework.
4. **Learning Curve**: Falcon's simplicity and focus on API development make it easier to learn and use for building APIs specifically. In contrast, Slim, with its MVC architecture, may have a steeper learning curve for beginners who are not familiar with this design pattern.
5. **Template Engine**: Slim incorporates a template engine by default, allowing developers to easily render views and data within their applications. Falcon, being focused on APIs, does not include a template engine by default, as it is not typically needed for API development.
6. **Routing System**: Falcon utilizes a simpler routing system that is optimized for RESTful APIs, making it easier to define routes and handle request methods. Slim offers a more flexible routing system that allows for complex route patterns and middleware, catering to a wider range of web application scenarios.

In Summary, Falcon and Slim differ in their programming paradigms, performance, community support, learning curves, template engines, and routing systems, catering to different needs in web development. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Slim
Slim
Falcon
Falcon

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

-
Intuitive routing via URI templates and resource classes;Easy access to headers and bodies through request and response classes;Idiomatic HTTP error responses via a handy exception base class;DRY request processing using global, resource, and method hooks;Snappy unit testing through WSGI helpers and mocks;20% speed boost when Cython is available;Python 2.6, Python 2.7, PyPy and Python 3.3/3.4 support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
273
Stacks
84
Followers
391
Followers
201
Votes
152
Votes
89
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    Microframework
  • 27
    API
  • 22
    Open source
  • 21
    Php
  • 11
    Fast
Pros
  • 13
    Python
  • 11
    FAST
  • 10
    Minimal
  • 8
    REST oriented
  • 8
    Open source
Integrations
PHP
PHP
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to Slim, Falcon?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Flask

Flask

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase