Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Falcon vs Flask: What are the differences?
Introduction
Falcon and Flask are both popular web frameworks for Python. Although they have similar objectives, there are key differences between the two.
Architecture: Falcon is a minimalist framework that follows a microservices-oriented architecture, while Flask is a full-featured framework that follows a monolithic architecture. Falcon focuses on providing a lightweight and efficient framework for building APIs, while Flask offers a more comprehensive set of tools and features for web development.
Performance: Falcon is known for its extremely fast performance and low memory footprint. It is designed to handle large numbers of concurrent requests efficiently. On the other hand, Flask, while still performing well, may not be as optimized for high-performance scenarios as Falcon.
Routing: Falcon uses a powerful routing engine based on URI templates, which provides flexibility and expressive power when defining routes. Flask, on the other hand, uses a more traditional routing system based on decorators, which is simpler and easier to understand for beginners.
Dependencies: Falcon has minimalistic dependencies, with only a few required libraries, making it lightweight and easy to install. Flask, on the other hand, has a larger number of dependencies, providing a more extensive set of features out of the box but also increasing the maintenance and installation complexity.
Extensibility: Falcon, being a minimalistic framework, lacks some features that Flask provides out of the box, such as form validation or session management. However, Falcon is highly extensible, allowing developers to easily add their own functionality or integrate with third-party libraries to fill in the gaps. Flask, being more feature-rich, provides many additional libraries and plugins to extend its capabilities without requiring custom implementations.
Learning Curve: Falcon has a steeper learning curve compared to Flask, as it requires a solid understanding of web development concepts and the Python language itself. Flask, on the other hand, provides a more beginner-friendly environment with excellent documentation and a large community that provides resources and support.
In Summary, Falcon excels in performance and lightweight architecture, while Flask offers a more comprehensive set of features and a lower learning curve for beginners.
Hey! So I am planning to make an e-commerce website with React Native as my frontend technology stack and MongoDB as my database. I was wondering what will be the best REST framework to use for my backend that will simply serve the frontend. Is Django rest framework a good option or should I go with Flask? I am currently leaning towards flask as the development team is well versed in it. Please help!
If the application is simple such as less endpoint or simple logic, I'd suggest Flask. But what you're building is quite a large system that contains many logics and a lot of models. So I'd suggest you with Django and Django REST framework. Django ORM is also one of the best ORM in the world as well.
FastAPI is modern microframework. If you haven't used any of them, I'd suggest FastAPI. Django REST is also good if you have previous experience with it.
My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.
Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?
If you want to be a Web developer with knowledge in another frontend and NoSql technology, maybe continue with Flask. However, if you want to create very fast solutions to grow up with a new business and merge these with data analysis and other tools, Django is the answer. Basically read more about the service architecture where you feel more comfortable, Microservice or Monolithic, but please will not married with any because they solve issues to different contexts.
Which is the best Python framework for microservices?
We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.
Bottle is much less bloated and fast. Its built-in templating system is one of the fastest as it compiles the templates in bytecode. Also Bottle has no depenencies, preventing dependency bloat.
I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.
I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?
Here are some features I am looking for:
Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.
Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.
Support for swagger/ OpenAPI
Support for JSON Web Token
Support for test case coverage report
Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.
For starters flask provides a beautiful and easy way to create REST APIs. Also its supported by excellent beginner docs as well as a very active community. Another good thing with Flask is its widely available list of plugins which allow you to build as you go. Its also good in performance and can scale to a quite decent level. However, if you are sure your project is going to be fairly big, it would be better to start with Django as it provides a lot of features out of the box and is extremely stable in performance. Both these frameworks have support for Swagger, JWT, Coverage Report although you have to install plugins for them. Deploying both of these are fairly simple and there is huge documentation available. Django has one of the best documentations I have come across. I hope I was able to answer your queries.
We decided to expose our small machine learning (ML) pipeline as a REST API. This allows us to nicely separate concerns from the rest of the codebase. There are two very popular choices in Python for building APIs: Flask and FastAPI. We have experience with both, but find that FastAPIs use of static type hints and validation with Pydantic allow us to build better APIs faster.
Pros of Falcon
- Python13
- FAST11
- Minimal10
- Open source8
- REST oriented8
- Well designed8
- Powerful6
- Really Light Weight6
- Documentation5
- Easy to develop and maintain applications5
- Easy to get started3
- Easy to deploy3
- Its simple while not limited2
- Faster1
- Kkk0
Pros of Flask
- For it flexibility10
- Flexibilty and easy to use9
- Flask8
- User friendly7
- Secured6
- Unopinionated5
- Secure2
- Customizable1
- Simple to use1
- Powerful1
- Rapid development1
- Beautiful code1
- Easy to develop and maintain applications1
- Easy to setup and get it going1
- Easy to use1
- Documentation1
- Python1
- Minimal1
- Lightweight1
- Easy to get started1
- Orm1
- Not JS1
- Perfect for small to large projects with superb docs.1
- Easy to integrate1
- Speed1
- Get started quickly1
- Open source0
- Well designed0
- Flexibilty0
- Productive0
- Awesome0
- Expressive0
- Love it0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Falcon
Cons of Flask
- Not JS10
- Context7
- Not fast5
- Don't has many module as in spring1