ExpressJS vs Starlette

Overview

ExpressJS

Stacks35.1K

Followers24.0K

Votes1.6K

Starlette

Stacks44

Followers21

Votes0

ExpressJS vs Starlette: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing ExpressJS and Starlette, several key differences stand out that developers need to consider. These differences range from performance to ease of use, making each framework suitable for different types of projects.

1. Performance: ExpressJS is known for its simplicity and robustness, making it a popular choice for developers. On the other hand, Starlette boasts superior performance due to its asynchronous nature, which allows it to handle high traffic loads more efficiently.

2. Asynchronous Support: Starlette supports asynchronous programming out of the box, making it ideal for handling I/O-bound operations or leveraging features like WebSockets. ExpressJS, while capable of asynchronous programming, may require additional libraries or plugins to achieve similar functionality.

3. Middleware Stack: ExpressJS has a wide range of middleware options available, allowing developers to easily extend and customize their applications. In contrast, Starlette has a more streamlined middleware pipeline, which may be beneficial for developers seeking a more minimalist approach.

4. Community and Ecosystem: ExpressJS has a large and well-established community with a vast ecosystem of plugins, tools, and resources available. While Starlette is gaining popularity, it may not have the same breadth of community support and resources as ExpressJS.

5. Flexibility and Extensibility: ExpressJS provides developers with a high level of flexibility, allowing them to mold the framework to fit their specific needs easily. On the other hand, Starlette offers a more opinionated approach, which can be beneficial for developers looking for a more structured and consistent development experience.

6. Learning Curve: ExpressJS has been around for longer and has more extensive documentation and tutorials available, making it easier for beginners to pick up and start using. Starlette, being a newer framework, may have a steeper learning curve due to its cutting-edge features and different approach to web development.

In Summary, ExpressJS and Starlette differ in performance, asynchronous support, middleware stack, community size, flexibility, and learning curve, making each framework suitable for different development scenarios.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

ExpressJS	Starlette
Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.	It is a lightweight ASGI framework/toolkit, which is ideal for building high performance asyncio services.
Robust routing;HTTP helpers (redirection, caching, etc);View system supporting 14+ template engines;Content negotiation;Focus on high performance;Executable for generating applications quickly;High test coverage	Seriously impressive performance; WebSocket support; GraphQL support; In-process background tasks; Startup and shutdown events; Test client built on requests; CORS, GZip, Static Files, Streaming responses; Session and Cookie support
Statistics
Stacks 35.1K	Stacks 44
Followers 24.0K	Followers 21
Votes 1.6K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 381 Simple 336 Node.js 244 Javascript 193 High performance 152 Robust routing Cons 27 Not python 17 Overrated 14 No multithreading 9 Javascript 5 Not fast	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Node.js	GraphQL

What are some alternatives to ExpressJS, Starlette?

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

ExpressJS vs Starlette: What are the differences?

Introduction

1. Performance: ExpressJS is known for its simplicity and robustness, making it a popular choice for developers. On the other hand, Starlette boasts superior performance due to its asynchronous nature, which allows it to handle high traffic loads more efficiently.

2. Asynchronous Support: Starlette supports asynchronous programming out of the box, making it ideal for handling I/O-bound operations or leveraging features like WebSockets. ExpressJS, while capable of asynchronous programming, may require additional libraries or plugins to achieve similar functionality.

3. Middleware Stack: ExpressJS has a wide range of middleware options available, allowing developers to easily extend and customize their applications. In contrast, Starlette has a more streamlined middleware pipeline, which may be beneficial for developers seeking a more minimalist approach.

4. Community and Ecosystem: ExpressJS has a large and well-established community with a vast ecosystem of plugins, tools, and resources available. While Starlette is gaining popularity, it may not have the same breadth of community support and resources as ExpressJS.

5. Flexibility and Extensibility: ExpressJS provides developers with a high level of flexibility, allowing them to mold the framework to fit their specific needs easily. On the other hand, Starlette offers a more opinionated approach, which can be beneficial for developers looking for a more structured and consistent development experience.

6. Learning Curve: ExpressJS has been around for longer and has more extensive documentation and tutorials available, making it easier for beginners to pick up and start using. Starlette, being a newer framework, may have a steeper learning curve due to its cutting-edge features and different approach to web development.

ExpressJS vs Starlette

Overview

ExpressJS vs Starlette: What are the differences?

Introduction

1. Performance: ExpressJS is known for its simplicity and robustness, making it a popular choice for developers. On the other hand, Starlette boasts superior performance due to its asynchronous nature, which allows it to handle high traffic loads more efficiently.

3. Middleware Stack: ExpressJS has a wide range of middleware options available, allowing developers to easily extend and customize their applications. In contrast, Starlette has a more streamlined middleware pipeline, which may be beneficial for developers seeking a more minimalist approach.