StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. ExpressJS vs Slim

ExpressJS vs Slim

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Stacks35.1K
Followers24.0K
Votes1.6K
Slim
Slim
Stacks273
Followers391
Votes152
GitHub Stars12.2K
Forks2.0K

ExpressJS vs Slim: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between ExpressJS and Slim. Both ExpressJS and Slim are popular web application frameworks used for building and developing web applications. While they serve a similar purpose, there are some notable differences between the two.

1. Modularity and Scalability: ExpressJS is known for its modularity and scalability. It allows developers to easily modularize their code and structure their application in a scalable way. It provides a wide range of middleware and libraries that can be integrated into the application to enhance its functionality. On the other hand, Slim is a microframework that focuses on simplicity and minimalism. It is designed to be lightweight and doesn't provide the same level of modularity and scalability as ExpressJS.

2. Routing and Middleware: ExpressJS has a sophisticated routing system that allows developers to define routes and handle HTTP requests in a straightforward manner. It provides a wide range of middleware functions that can be used to handle common tasks such as logging, authentication, and error handling. Slim, on the other hand, has a simpler routing system and a limited set of middleware functions. It is less feature-rich compared to ExpressJS in terms of routing and middleware.

3. Template Engine Support: ExpressJS has built-in support for various template engines, such as EJS, Pug, and Handlebars. These template engines allow developers to render dynamic content and generate HTML on the server-side. Slim, on the other hand, doesn't have built-in support for template engines. However, it can still integrate with third-party template engines by using extensions or plugins.

4. Community and Ecosystem: ExpressJS has a large and active community with a wide range of resources and libraries available. It has been around for a long time and is widely adopted by developers. This means that there is a wealth of documentation, tutorials, and open-source projects to draw upon. Slim, on the other hand, has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to ExpressJS. While it still has a dedicated user base, the resources and libraries available may be more limited.

5. Performance and Footprint: ExpressJS is known for its performance and scalability. It is built on top of the Node.js runtime, which is known for its high-performance capabilities. ExpressJS applications can handle a large number of concurrent requests without significant performance degradation. Slim, on the other hand, is designed to be lightweight and has a smaller footprint compared to ExpressJS. It is suitable for small to medium-sized applications where performance is not the primary concern.

6. Learning Curve and Ease of Use: ExpressJS has a steeper learning curve compared to Slim. It has more features and options, which can make it more challenging for beginners to get started with. However, once developers become familiar with ExpressJS, they have more flexibility and control over their application. Slim, on the other hand, has a simpler and more intuitive API, making it easier for beginners to grasp. It has a shallower learning curve but may lack the advanced features and flexibility of ExpressJS.

In Summary, ExpressJS and Slim are both web application frameworks, but ExpressJS offers more modularity, better routing and middleware support, built-in template engine support, a larger community and ecosystem, better performance, and scalability. However, Slim provides simplicity, a smaller footprint, and an easier learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on ExpressJS, Slim

Tony
Tony

Oct 21, 2020

Review

I personally like using a wholly JS stack, with TypeORM + MySql/Postgres over MongoDb + Mongoose because TypeOrm's Typescript support is much stronger. After developing large projects with Typescript, there is no going back to regular javascript (typings help catch a LOT of errors / maintains data structure !)

Sticking with a javascript stack will allow you to share certain aspects of your application between front and backend. For example: one particularly common feature is to validate API call data and form entry data. Both of these are the same data shape typically (aside from pagination, metadata, etc), and can benefit from a single schema for validation. I use Yup to define this schema, then in the front and back end I can utilize this definition instead of rewriting the same logic in two different languages.

Same goes for certain utility functions such as data structure typings, decryption, encryption, sanitizing inputs, formatting of data, and other utilities. No point of writing these in two languages when both frontend and backend will use them. It will also help reduce developer work load, due to less tests / code to work with.

The only thing you must ensure in your import chain the frontend never imports any secret variables or sensitive logic used by the backend, as that will get bundled into your application. All shared imports should be individual modules

If you want to go one step further, next.js is basically create react app with server side rendering (SSR). This would allow you to skip the annoying step of configuring separate backend and frontend build tools. Might be worth exploring depending on your skill level.

812 views812
Comments
septblast
septblast

Oct 14, 2021

Review

You must have gone through multiple thoughts on how to handle the requirement, but the biggest problem that I am able to see here is a dependency on a certain platform for executing Powershell scripts. Next is being a developer will never suggest having Powershell or bash as a backend of your system until it is related to some IoT Stuff. In place of it, I would rather suggest you use Infrastructure as a Code that comes with terraform or Ansible or as your application is based on Azure so u can use Azure Resource Manager too.

Adding to it for making config or attaching a trigger to these infrastructure controllers, you can use lightweight stateful APIs with the help of flask or express or go-mux, to keep track on the progress of deployments.

2.54k views2.54k
Comments
tornike
tornike

Feb 5, 2022

Review

Hi

I am new here . . . but for backend - I assume you implement it with NodeJS - maybe you could give try to FeathersJS Server? I have used it previously for my PHD project. It comes with support of dozens of databases. You do not need to worry about database scripts and connection routines, FeathersJS abstracts all of this for you. It implements connection with database using services. These services conform with CRUD philosophy which obviously you can customize based on your needs.

This server is well documented.

Also authors of this server claim that you will be able to deliver production grade app within days and from my experience I can say that this is true. This server should be good choice for beginner

Good luck!

76 views76
Comments

Detailed Comparison

ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Slim
Slim

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Robust routing;HTTP helpers (redirection, caching, etc);View system supporting 14+ template engines;Content negotiation;Focus on high performance;Executable for generating applications quickly;High test coverage
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
12.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.0K
Stacks
35.1K
Stacks
273
Followers
24.0K
Followers
391
Votes
1.6K
Votes
152
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 381
    Simple
  • 336
    Node.js
  • 244
    Javascript
  • 193
    High performance
  • 152
    Robust routing
Cons
  • 27
    Not python
  • 17
    Overrated
  • 14
    No multithreading
  • 9
    Javascript
  • 5
    Not fast
Pros
  • 33
    Microframework
  • 27
    API
  • 22
    Open source
  • 21
    Php
  • 11
    Fast
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to ExpressJS, Slim?

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Flask

Flask

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase