StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. ExpressJS vs Moleculer

ExpressJS vs Moleculer

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Stacks35.1K
Followers24.0K
Votes1.6K
Moleculer
Moleculer
Stacks59
Followers88
Votes14
GitHub Stars6.3K
Forks597

ExpressJS vs Moleculer: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of web development, ExpressJS and Moleculer are two popular frameworks that developers can use to build applications. Although they both serve the purpose of facilitating web development, they have some key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore the key differences between ExpressJS and Moleculer in detail.

  1. Architecture: ExpressJS is a minimalist web framework that follows a traditional monolithic architecture, where the entire application logic is contained within a single codebase. On the other hand, Moleculer is a microservices framework that promotes a distributed architecture, where the application is divided into smaller independent services that can communicate with each other. This enables better scalability, fault tolerance, and flexibility in Moleculer compared to ExpressJS.

  2. Scalability: ExpressJS is known for its simplicity and straightforwardness, making it a good choice for small to medium-sized applications. However, as the application grows in complexity and traffic, it may become challenging to scale ExpressJS efficiently. Moleculer, with its microservices architecture, excels in scalability as it allows individual services to be scaled independently based on their specific needs. This makes Moleculer a suitable choice for large and highly scalable applications.

  3. Service Communication: ExpressJS primarily relies on HTTP as the communication protocol between the client and the server. It follows a request-response paradigm where each request from the client triggers a response from the server. On the other hand, Moleculer uses a message-based communication system that goes beyond traditional HTTP. It supports different communication patterns such as request-response, event-driven, and streaming, making it more versatile and suitable for complex distributed systems.

  4. Framework Complexity: ExpressJS is known for its simplicity and minimalistic approach. It provides developers with the freedom to choose and configure the components they need, resulting in a lightweight and flexible framework. On the other hand, Moleculer is a feature-rich framework that comes with a set of built-in functionalities and features such as service discovery, load balancing, and fault tolerance. This makes Moleculer more opinionated and suitable for developers who prefer a batteries-included approach.

  5. Language Agnostic: ExpressJS is a Node.js framework, which means it is tightly coupled with JavaScript. It leverages the power of Node.js and its ecosystem to build web applications. Moleculer, on the other hand, is a language-agnostic framework that can be used with different programming languages such as JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Java, and Golang. This allows developers to choose the language they are most comfortable with while still leveraging the benefits of the Moleculer framework.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: ExpressJS has been around for a long time and has a mature and vibrant community. It has a large number of third-party libraries, plugins, and middleware available, making it easy to extend and customize. Moleculer, although relatively newer compared to ExpressJS, is gaining popularity and has an active community. However, it may not have the same level of ecosystem and support as ExpressJS.

In summary, ExpressJS is a minimalist and lightweight framework known for its simplicity and flexibility, while Moleculer is a feature-rich microservices framework that promotes scalability and fault tolerance. The choice between the two frameworks depends on the specific requirements of the application and the preferences of the developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Moleculer
Moleculer

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

Robust routing;HTTP helpers (redirection, caching, etc);View system supporting 14+ template engines;Content negotiation;Focus on high performance;Executable for generating applications quickly;High test coverage
Blazing fast; Extensible; Open source; Fault tolerance
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
6.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
597
Stacks
35.1K
Stacks
59
Followers
24.0K
Followers
88
Votes
1.6K
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 381
    Simple
  • 336
    Node.js
  • 244
    Javascript
  • 193
    High performance
  • 152
    Robust routing
Cons
  • 27
    Not python
  • 17
    Overrated
  • 14
    No multithreading
  • 9
    Javascript
  • 5
    Not fast
Pros
  • 3
    Typescript
  • 3
    Complete microservices ecosystem without lerning curve
  • 3
    Many integrations out of the box (db,messaging,tracing)
  • 2
    Node.js
  • 2
    High performance
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
MongoDB
MongoDB
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Node.js
Node.js
MSSQL
MSSQL
MySQL
MySQL
SQLite
SQLite

What are some alternatives to ExpressJS, Moleculer?

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot