StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. ExpressJS vs LoopBack

ExpressJS vs LoopBack

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Stacks35.1K
Followers24.0K
Votes1.6K
LoopBack
LoopBack
Stacks285
Followers556
Votes33
GitHub Stars13.2K
Forks1.2K

ExpressJS vs LoopBack: What are the differences?

Introduction

ExpressJS and LoopBack are both popular frameworks used for building web applications, but they have some key differences that set them apart from each other. In this article, we will discuss six specific differences between ExpressJS and LoopBack.

  1. Routing and Middleware: ExpressJS is a minimalist framework that provides a basic set of features for building web applications. It has a simple routing system and allows developers to easily add middleware functions to handle HTTP requests. On the other hand, LoopBack is a highly extensible framework that has a built-in routing system and supports the concept of models and repositories. It provides a powerful middleware architecture, making it suitable for complex and scalable applications.

  2. Data Access: ExpressJS doesn't come with any built-in features for handling data access. It leaves the choice of database and ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) to the developer. In contrast, LoopBack provides a robust data access layer out-of-the-box. It supports multiple databases and ORM connectors, making it easier for developers to work with data.

  3. Security: ExpressJS doesn't have any built-in security features. It is up to the developer to implement security measures like authentication and authorization. LoopBack, on the other hand, provides out-of-the-box security features like built-in authentication and authorization mechanisms. It allows developers to easily secure their APIs and protect their data.

  4. API Generation: ExpressJS allows developers to define their API endpoints manually using routing and middleware functions. It provides a lot of flexibility but requires more manual configuration. In contrast, LoopBack uses a model-driven approach to generate APIs automatically. Developers can define their data models, and LoopBack will generate the API endpoints for CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) operations automatically. This makes it faster to build APIs with LoopBack but may be less flexible than the manual approach of ExpressJS.

  5. Documentation and Community Support: ExpressJS has been around for a longer time and has a larger community compared to LoopBack. It has a vast amount of documentation and a wide range of community-contributed packages and modules. LoopBack, although gaining popularity, has a smaller community and fewer resources available. This may affect the availability of support and the speed of getting help when encountering issues.

  6. Scalability: ExpressJS is a lightweight and flexible framework that can be easily scaled horizontally. It can handle a high number of concurrent connections, making it suitable for small to medium-sized applications. LoopBack, on the other hand, is designed for building scalable and enterprise-grade applications. It supports clustering and load balancing out-of-the-box, making it suitable for large-scale applications with high traffic.

In summary, ExpressJS is a minimalist and flexible framework suitable for building small to medium-sized applications, while LoopBack is a highly extensible and feature-rich framework suitable for building scalable and enterprise-grade applications with built-in security and data access layers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ExpressJS
ExpressJS
LoopBack
LoopBack

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

A highly-extensible, open-source Node.js framework that enables you to create dynamic end-to-end REST APIs with little or no coding. Connect to multiple data sources, write business logic in Node.js, glue on top of your existing services and data, connect using JS, iOS & Android SDKs.

Robust routing;HTTP helpers (redirection, caching, etc);View system supporting 14+ template engines;Content negotiation;Focus on high performance;Executable for generating applications quickly;High test coverage
A brand new core; OpenAPI spec driven REST API; GraphQL support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
13.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
35.1K
Stacks
285
Followers
24.0K
Followers
556
Votes
1.6K
Votes
33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 381
    Simple
  • 336
    Node.js
  • 244
    Javascript
  • 193
    High performance
  • 152
    Robust routing
Cons
  • 27
    Not python
  • 17
    Overrated
  • 14
    No multithreading
  • 9
    Javascript
  • 5
    Not fast
Pros
  • 11
    Need a nodejs ReST-API, DB, AAA, Swagger? Then loopback
  • 9
    Easy Database Migration
  • 6
    Code generator
  • 4
    The future of API's
  • 2
    GraphQL
Cons
  • 7
    Community is slow
  • 1
    Backward compatibility
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
Node.js
Node.js
TypeScript
TypeScript
StrongLoop
StrongLoop
GraphQL
GraphQL

What are some alternatives to ExpressJS, LoopBack?

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase