StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. ExpressJS vs Falcon

ExpressJS vs Falcon

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Stacks35.1K
Followers24.0K
Votes1.6K
Falcon
Falcon
Stacks84
Followers201
Votes89

ExpressJS vs Falcon: What are the differences?

ExpressJS vs Falcon

ExpressJS and Falcon are both popular web frameworks utilized for building web applications. Below are the key differences between ExpressJS and Falcon:

  1. Architectural Design: ExpressJS follows the middleware approach, allowing developers to insert various functions that intercept requests and responses. In contrast, Falcon is designed around the concept of resource classes and certain high-level abstractions, providing a more streamlined structure for API development.

  2. Language Support: ExpressJS is essentially based on JavaScript and is widely used for developing applications in Node.js. On the other hand, Falcon is specifically designed for Python and focuses on creating RESTful web APIs, making it a preferred choice for Python developers.

  3. Community and Ecosystem: ExpressJS has a large community of developers and a vast ecosystem of modules and libraries available for extending its capabilities. Falcon, being relatively newer, has a smaller community but is steadily growing, with a focus on simplicity and performance over a wide range of features.

  4. Performance: Falcon is known for its high-performance capabilities, as it is designed for speed and efficiency in handling HTTP requests and responses. ExpressJS, while versatile and widely used, may not match the same level of performance optimization offered by Falcon in certain scenarios.

  5. Learning Curve: ExpressJS is known for its simplicity and ease of getting started, making it a popular choice for beginners and experienced developers alike. Falcon, with its more structured and opinionated approach, may have a steeper learning curve for those new to the framework or Python programming in general.

  6. Use Cases: ExpressJS is well-suited for building a variety of web applications, including websites, APIs, and full-scale web applications. Falcon, on the other hand, is particularly geared towards developing lightweight and fast APIs, making it an ideal choice for microservices and projects where performance is a critical factor.

In Summary, ExpressJS and Falcon differ in their architectural design, language support, community, performance, learning curve, and use cases, catering to distinct preferences and requirements in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on ExpressJS, Falcon

Tony
Tony

Oct 21, 2020

Review

I personally like using a wholly JS stack, with TypeORM + MySql/Postgres over MongoDb + Mongoose because TypeOrm's Typescript support is much stronger. After developing large projects with Typescript, there is no going back to regular javascript (typings help catch a LOT of errors / maintains data structure !)

Sticking with a javascript stack will allow you to share certain aspects of your application between front and backend. For example: one particularly common feature is to validate API call data and form entry data. Both of these are the same data shape typically (aside from pagination, metadata, etc), and can benefit from a single schema for validation. I use Yup to define this schema, then in the front and back end I can utilize this definition instead of rewriting the same logic in two different languages.

Same goes for certain utility functions such as data structure typings, decryption, encryption, sanitizing inputs, formatting of data, and other utilities. No point of writing these in two languages when both frontend and backend will use them. It will also help reduce developer work load, due to less tests / code to work with.

The only thing you must ensure in your import chain the frontend never imports any secret variables or sensitive logic used by the backend, as that will get bundled into your application. All shared imports should be individual modules

If you want to go one step further, next.js is basically create react app with server side rendering (SSR). This would allow you to skip the annoying step of configuring separate backend and frontend build tools. Might be worth exploring depending on your skill level.

799 views799
Comments
septblast
septblast

Oct 14, 2021

Review

You must have gone through multiple thoughts on how to handle the requirement, but the biggest problem that I am able to see here is a dependency on a certain platform for executing Powershell scripts. Next is being a developer will never suggest having Powershell or bash as a backend of your system until it is related to some IoT Stuff. In place of it, I would rather suggest you use Infrastructure as a Code that comes with terraform or Ansible or as your application is based on Azure so u can use Azure Resource Manager too.

Adding to it for making config or attaching a trigger to these infrastructure controllers, you can use lightweight stateful APIs with the help of flask or express or go-mux, to keep track on the progress of deployments.

2.54k views2.54k
Comments
tornike
tornike

Feb 5, 2022

Review

Hi

I am new here . . . but for backend - I assume you implement it with NodeJS - maybe you could give try to FeathersJS Server? I have used it previously for my PHD project. It comes with support of dozens of databases. You do not need to worry about database scripts and connection routines, FeathersJS abstracts all of this for you. It implements connection with database using services. These services conform with CRUD philosophy which obviously you can customize based on your needs.

This server is well documented.

Also authors of this server claim that you will be able to deliver production grade app within days and from my experience I can say that this is true. This server should be good choice for beginner

Good luck!

74 views74
Comments

Detailed Comparison

ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Falcon
Falcon

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

Robust routing;HTTP helpers (redirection, caching, etc);View system supporting 14+ template engines;Content negotiation;Focus on high performance;Executable for generating applications quickly;High test coverage
Intuitive routing via URI templates and resource classes;Easy access to headers and bodies through request and response classes;Idiomatic HTTP error responses via a handy exception base class;DRY request processing using global, resource, and method hooks;Snappy unit testing through WSGI helpers and mocks;20% speed boost when Cython is available;Python 2.6, Python 2.7, PyPy and Python 3.3/3.4 support
Statistics
Stacks
35.1K
Stacks
84
Followers
24.0K
Followers
201
Votes
1.6K
Votes
89
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 381
    Simple
  • 336
    Node.js
  • 244
    Javascript
  • 193
    High performance
  • 152
    Robust routing
Cons
  • 27
    Not python
  • 17
    Overrated
  • 14
    No multithreading
  • 9
    Javascript
  • 5
    Not fast
Pros
  • 13
    Python
  • 11
    FAST
  • 10
    Minimal
  • 8
    REST oriented
  • 8
    Well designed
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to ExpressJS, Falcon?

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Flask

Flask

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase