Eureka vs Selenium

Overview

Selenium

Stacks16.2K

Followers12.6K

Votes527

GitHub Stars33.6K

Forks8.6K

Eureka

Stacks291

Followers779

Votes70

GitHub Stars12.7K

Forks3.8K

Eureka vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Introduction

Eureka and Selenium are two popular tools used in software development and testing. While both are used for testing applications, they have key differences that set them apart.

Architecture: One of the key differences between Eureka and Selenium lies in their architecture. Eureka is a service registry and discovery server, which means it helps in registering and discovering services in a distributed system. On the other hand, Selenium is a web testing framework that allows testers to automate browser actions.
Functionality: Eureka primarily focuses on service discovery and registration, providing a way for applications to find and communicate with each other in a distributed system. It provides a RESTful interface for registration, deregistration, and querying of services. Selenium, on the other hand, is specifically designed for web testing and automation. It allows testers to simulate user interactions on a website and validate the expected behavior.
Scope: Eureka is typically used in microservices architectures, where applications are divided into smaller, loosely coupled services. It helps in managing the dynamic nature of these services by providing a centralized way to discover and communicate with them. Selenium, on the other hand, is focused on web testing and automation, regardless of the underlying architecture of the application.
Language and Platform Support: Eureka is a Java-based tool and is part of the Spring Cloud ecosystem. As such, it integrates well with Spring Boot applications and provides native support in Java. Selenium, on the other hand, supports multiple languages including Java, C#, Python, Ruby, and JavaScript. It can be used with different web browsers like Chrome, Firefox, and Internet Explorer.
Testing Scope: While Eureka is primarily used for service discovery and registration, Selenium provides a wider range of testing capabilities. With Selenium, testers can perform functional testing, regression testing, performance testing, and even UI testing. It allows testers to write test scripts for specific browser actions and validate the expected outcomes.
Integration Testing: Eureka is commonly used in integration testing scenarios, where the focus is on testing the interactions between different services. It helps in simulating the communication between services and ensures that the integration between them functions as expected. Selenium, on the other hand, is more commonly used in frontend testing, where the focus is on testing the user interface and user interactions on a website.

In summary, Eureka and Selenium have distinct purposes and functionalities. Eureka is used for service registry and discovery in distributed systems, while Selenium is a web testing framework used for automating browser actions and validating the behavior of web applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Selenium, Eureka

Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium	Eureka
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.	Eureka is a REST (Representational State Transfer) based service that is primarily used in the AWS cloud for locating services for the purpose of load balancing and failover of middle-tier servers.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 33.6K	GitHub Stars 12.7K
GitHub Forks 8.6K	GitHub Forks 3.8K
Stacks 16.2K	Stacks 291
Followers 12.6K	Followers 779
Votes 527	Votes 70
Pros & Cons
Pros 177 Automates browsers 154 Testing 101 Essential tool for running test automation 24 Record-Playback 24 Remote Control Cons 8 Flaky tests 4 Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui) 2 Update browser drivers	Pros 21 Easy setup and integration with spring-cloud 9 Web ui 8 Health checking 8 Monitoring 7 Circuit breaker Cons 1 Nada
Integrations
No integrations available	Amazon EC2

What are some alternatives to Selenium, Eureka?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Consul

Consul is a tool for service discovery and configuration. Consul is distributed, highly available, and extremely scalable.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

Zookeeper

A centralized service for maintaining configuration information, naming, providing distributed synchronization, and providing group services. All of these kinds of services are used in some form or another by distributed applications.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

etcd

etcd is a distributed key value store that provides a reliable way to store data across a cluster of machines. It’s open-source and available on GitHub. etcd gracefully handles master elections during network partitions and will tolerate machine failure, including the master.

Related Comparisons

Eureka vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Introduction

Eureka and Selenium are two popular tools used in software development and testing. While both are used for testing applications, they have key differences that set them apart.

Architecture: One of the key differences between Eureka and Selenium lies in their architecture. Eureka is a service registry and discovery server, which means it helps in registering and discovering services in a distributed system. On the other hand, Selenium is a web testing framework that allows testers to automate browser actions.
Functionality: Eureka primarily focuses on service discovery and registration, providing a way for applications to find and communicate with each other in a distributed system. It provides a RESTful interface for registration, deregistration, and querying of services. Selenium, on the other hand, is specifically designed for web testing and automation. It allows testers to simulate user interactions on a website and validate the expected behavior.
Scope: Eureka is typically used in microservices architectures, where applications are divided into smaller, loosely coupled services. It helps in managing the dynamic nature of these services by providing a centralized way to discover and communicate with them. Selenium, on the other hand, is focused on web testing and automation, regardless of the underlying architecture of the application.
Language and Platform Support: Eureka is a Java-based tool and is part of the Spring Cloud ecosystem. As such, it integrates well with Spring Boot applications and provides native support in Java. Selenium, on the other hand, supports multiple languages including Java, C#, Python, Ruby, and JavaScript. It can be used with different web browsers like Chrome, Firefox, and Internet Explorer.
Testing Scope: While Eureka is primarily used for service discovery and registration, Selenium provides a wider range of testing capabilities. With Selenium, testers can perform functional testing, regression testing, performance testing, and even UI testing. It allows testers to write test scripts for specific browser actions and validate the expected outcomes.
Integration Testing: Eureka is commonly used in integration testing scenarios, where the focus is on testing the interactions between different services. It helps in simulating the communication between services and ensures that the integration between them functions as expected. Selenium, on the other hand, is more commonly used in frontend testing, where the focus is on testing the user interface and user interactions on a website.

Eureka vs Selenium

Overview

Eureka vs Selenium: What are the differences?