StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. MongoDB vs etcd

MongoDB vs etcd

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MongoDB
MongoDB
Stacks96.6K
Followers82.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars27.7K
Forks5.7K
etcd
etcd
Stacks308
Followers412
Votes24

MongoDB vs etcd: What are the differences?

  1. Database Structure and Model: MongoDB is a document database that stores data in flexible, JSON-like documents with dynamic schemas. It allows for the storage of structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data. On the other hand, etcd is a distributed key-value store that provides a hierarchical data model for storing and retrieving data in a tree-like structure. It is designed to handle large amounts of small, often transient data.
  2. Consistency and Availability: MongoDB provides strong consistency, which means that data changes are immediately visible to all users. It also supports high availability through replication, allowing for automatic failover and continuous operation in case of failures. Etcd, on the other hand, provides strong consistency guarantees by using a consensus algorithm. However, it sacrifices availability in the event of network partitions or failures to maintain consistency.
  3. Querying and Indexing: MongoDB provides a rich query language that supports a wide range of operators and capabilities for querying documents. It also supports indexing to improve query performance. Etcd, on the other hand, does not provide a query language but allows for simple key-based retrieval and manipulation of data.
  4. Data Replication and Clustering: MongoDB supports horizontal scalability through sharding, allowing for distributing data across multiple servers. It also provides automatic data replication and failover to ensure high availability. Etcd, on the other hand, uses a distributed consensus algorithm to replicate data across multiple nodes, providing fault tolerance and durability.
  5. Concurrency Control: MongoDB uses optimistic concurrency control, allowing multiple clients to read and write data simultaneously. It uses a versioning system to handle conflicts and ensures consistency during concurrent operations. Etcd, on the other hand, uses a distributed locking mechanism to handle concurrency control and prevent conflicts between multiple clients accessing the same key.
  6. Use Cases and Scalability: MongoDB is well-suited for applications that require flexible data models and high performance for read-heavy workloads. It is widely used in web applications, content management systems, and real-time analytics. Etcd, on the other hand, is often used for coordination and configuration purposes in distributed systems, such as service discovery, distributed locking, and dynamic configuration updates.

In Summary, MongoDB and etcd differ in terms of their database structure and model, consistency and availability guarantees, querying and indexing capabilities, data replication and clustering mechanisms, concurrency control approaches, and their use cases and scalability profiles.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on MongoDB, etcd

George
George

Student

Mar 18, 2020

Needs adviceonPostgreSQLPostgreSQLPythonPythonDjangoDjango

Hello everyone,

Well, I want to build a large-scale project, but I do not know which ORDBMS to choose. The app should handle real-time operations, not chatting, but things like future scheduling or reminders. It should be also really secure, fast and easy to use. And last but not least, should I use them both. I mean PostgreSQL with Python / Django and MongoDB with Node.js? Or would it be better to use PostgreSQL with Node.js?

*The project is going to use React for the front-end and GraphQL is going to be used for the API.

Thank you all. Any answer or advice would be really helpful!

620k views620k
Comments
Ido
Ido

Mar 6, 2020

Decided

My data was inherently hierarchical, but there was not enough content in each level of the hierarchy to justify a relational DB (SQL) with a one-to-many approach. It was also far easier to share data between the frontend (Angular), backend (Node.js) and DB (MongoDB) as they all pass around JSON natively. This allowed me to skip the translation layer from relational to hierarchical. You do need to think about correct indexes in MongoDB, and make sure the objects have finite size. For instance, an object in your DB shouldn't have a property which is an array that grows over time, without limit. In addition, I did use MySQL for other types of data, such as a catalog of products which (a) has a lot of data, (b) flat and not hierarchical, (c) needed very fast queries.

575k views575k
Comments
Mike
Mike

Mar 20, 2020

Needs advice

We Have thousands of .pdf docs generated from the same form but with lots of variability. We need to extract data from open text and more important - from tables inside the docs. The output of Couchbase/Mongo will be one row per document for backend processing. ADOBE renders the tables in an unusable form.

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

MongoDB
MongoDB
etcd
etcd

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

etcd is a distributed key value store that provides a reliable way to store data across a cluster of machines. It’s open-source and available on GitHub. etcd gracefully handles master elections during network partitions and will tolerate machine failure, including the master.

Flexible data model, expressive query language, secondary indexes, replication, auto-sharding, in-place updates, aggregation, GridFS
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
27.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
96.6K
Stacks
308
Followers
82.0K
Followers
412
Votes
4.1K
Votes
24
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 829
    Document-oriented storage
  • 594
    No sql
  • 554
    Ease of use
  • 465
    Fast
  • 410
    High performance
Cons
  • 6
    Very slowly for connected models that require joins
  • 3
    Not acid compliant
  • 2
    Proprietary query language
Pros
  • 11
    Service discovery
  • 6
    Fault tolerant key value store
  • 2
    Secure
  • 2
    Bundled with coreos
  • 1
    Open Source

What are some alternatives to MongoDB, etcd?

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

Consul

Consul

Consul is a tool for service discovery and configuration. Consul is distributed, highly available, and extremely scalable.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot