StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. ESLint vs Jenkins

ESLint vs Jenkins

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
ESLint
ESLint
Stacks38.6K
Followers14.0K
Votes28
GitHub Stars26.6K
Forks4.8K

ESLint vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Key Differences between ESLint and Jenkins

ESLint and Jenkins are two widely used tools in the software development industry. While ESLint is a powerful linting tool for JavaScript code, Jenkins is a popular open-source automation server used for continuous integration and delivery purposes.

1. Integration vs. Code Analysis: ESLint is primarily used for code analysis, helping developers identify and fix potential errors, enforce coding standards, and improve code quality. On the other hand, Jenkins focuses on integrating different tools and processes to automate the build, test, and deployment pipelines.

2. Language Focus: ESLint is specifically designed for JavaScript and its related frameworks, providing a comprehensive set of rules and plugins to analyze and enforce coding standards in JavaScript codebases. In contrast, Jenkins is a versatile tool that can be used with various programming languages, making it suitable for projects using different languages.

3. Manual Configuration vs. Configuration as Code: Setting up ESLint requires manual configuration by adding rules, plugins, and configuration files to the project. It offers flexibility in tailoring linting rules to specific project requirements. In contrast, Jenkins follows a configuration-as-code approach, allowing users to define the build and deployment pipelines using code, typically written in a Groovy-based DSL (Domain-Specific Language).

4. Featureset: ESLint offers a range of features such as custom rules creation, automatic fixing of certain errors, ability to ignore specific files or directories, integration with code editors, and support for different environments or frameworks. Jenkins, on the other hand, provides a broader set of features including build triggers, test execution, integration with version control systems, artifact management, and deployment orchestration.

5. User Interface: ESLint is primarily used through the command line interface or as a plugin in code editors, providing detailed reports and error messages in the console or editor. On the contrary, Jenkins offers a web-based user interface, allowing users to monitor and manage build pipelines, view build logs, configure job schedules, and access various plugins for additional functionality.

6. Use Case focus: ESLint is mainly used during the development phase to identify and address coding errors, enforce best practices, and maintain code quality. Jenkins, on the other hand, is primarily used for automated build, test, and deployment processes, ensuring continuous integration and enabling continuous delivery or deployment.

In Summary, ESLint is more focused on code analysis and enforcing coding standards in JavaScript codebases, while Jenkins is an automation server primarily used for continuous integration and delivery purposes across different programming languages.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, ESLint

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
ESLint
ESLint

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
26.6K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
4.8K
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
38.6K
Followers
50.4K
Followers
14.0K
Votes
2.2K
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Lack of support
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
Pros
  • 8
    Consistent javascript - opinions don't matter anymore
  • 6
    IDE Integration
  • 6
    Free
  • 4
    Customizable
  • 2
    Focuses code review on quality not style
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, ESLint?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana