StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. ES6 vs NativeScript

ES6 vs NativeScript

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NativeScript
NativeScript
Stacks533
Followers1.1K
Votes516
GitHub Stars25.3K
Forks1.7K
ES6
ES6
Stacks72.5K
Followers60.9K
Votes167

ES6 vs NativeScript: What are the differences?

1. **Speed**: ES6 is a scripting language used for web development, while NativeScript is a framework for building native mobile applications. In terms of speed, NativeScript performs better as it compiles JavaScript into native code during runtime, resulting in faster execution compared to ES6. 2. **Platform Access**: NativeScript provides direct access to platform APIs, allowing developers to utilize device-specific features seamlessly in their mobile applications. On the other hand, ES6 mainly focuses on web development and lacks the inherent capability to access native platform features. 3. **User Interface Components**: NativeScript offers a wide range of UI components that are designed to mirror the native elements of iOS and Android platforms, providing a truly authentic experience for users. In contrast, ES6 does not come with built-in UI components tailored for mobile applications. 4. **Performance Optimization**: NativeScript optimizes performance by enabling ahead-of-time compilation, reducing startup times, and enhancing the overall efficiency of mobile applications. Conversely, ES6 does not have the same level of performance optimization specifically tailored for native mobile development. 5. **Native Plugins Integration**: NativeScript seamlessly integrates with native plugins, allowing developers to enhance their applications with additional functionalities that may not be readily available in the core framework. ES6, on the other hand, does not have the same level of integration with native plugins for mobile development. 6. **Cross-Platform Compatibility**: While NativeScript supports cross-platform development for both iOS and Android using a single codebase, ES6 primarily caters to web development and may require additional frameworks or tools for achieving cross-platform compatibility in mobile applications.

In Summary, NativeScript offers better performance, platform access, user interface components, performance optimization, native plugins integration, and cross-platform compatibility compared to ES6 for mobile application development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NativeScript, ES6

Amir
Amir

Feb 7, 2020

Review

This post is a bit of an obvious one, as we have a web application, we obviously need to have HTML and CSS in our stack. Though specifically though, we can talk a bit about backward compatibility and the specific approaches we want to enforce in our codebase.

HTML : Not much explanation here, you have to interact with HTML for a web app. We will stick to the latest standard: HTML 5.

CSS: Again if we want to style any of our components within he web, we have to use to style it. Though we will be taking advantage of JSS in our code base and try to minimize the # of CSS stylesheets and include all our styling within the components themselves. This leaves the codebase much cleaner and makes it easier to find styles!

Babel: We understand that not every browser is able to support the cool new features of the latest node/JS features (such as redue, filter, etc) seen in ES6. We will make sure to have the correct Babel configuration o make our application backward compatible.

Material UI (MUI): We need to make our user interface as intuitive and pretty as possible within his MVP, and the UI framework used by Google will provide us with exactly that. MUI provides pretty much all the UI components you would need and allows heavy customization as well. Its vast # of demos will allow us to add components quickly and not get too hung up on making UI components.

We will be using the latest version of create-react-app which bundles most of the above along many necessary frameworks (e.g. Jest for testing) to get started quickly.

128k views128k
Comments
Aleksandr
Aleksandr

Contract Software Engineer - Microsoft at Microsoft-365

Dec 23, 2019

Review

How to make your JS code faster just adding some parenthesis?

Optimize-js I will not describe this tool a lot here, because it's already good done by author on github

I just want to mention that this tool wrap up all immediately-invoked functions or likely-to-be-invoked functions in parentheses what is do a great optimization a JavaScript file for faster initial execution and parsing (based on my experience).

The performance of application where I've introduced optimize-js improved on 20% in a common (tested in Chrome and IE11).

Why it happens?

  • Clarification on Readme to the optimize-js
  • Some of Nolan thoughts on the virtues of compile-time optimizations can be found in "Parens and Performance" – counterpost

Is it maintaining now? - Unfortunately, no (but feel free to send PR)

223k views223k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

Feb 6, 2020

Needs advice

For our front-end, React is chosen because it is easy to develop with due to its reusable components and state functions, in addition to a lot of community support. Because React is popular, it would be easy to hire for it here at our company MusiCore. Our team also has experience with React already. React can be written with ES6 and ES6 has a lot of popularity and versatility when it comes to creating classes and efficient functions. Node.js will be used as a runtime environment to compile the code. Node.js also has many different types of open-source packages that can help automate some of the tasks we want to do for the application. CSS 3 will be used to style components and is the standard for that.

47.1k views47.1k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NativeScript
NativeScript
ES6
ES6

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Goals for ECMAScript 2015 include providing better support for large applications, library creation, and for use of ECMAScript as a compilation target for other languages. Some of its major enhancements include modules, class declarations, lexical block scoping, iterators and generators, promises for asynchronous programming, destructuring patterns, and proper tail calls.

100% Access to Native Platform API;NativeScript is free of charge as an open source project;Code with JavaScript. Style with CSS;Cross-platform UI abstractions;Shared business logic and data models
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
25.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
533
Stacks
72.5K
Followers
1.1K
Followers
60.9K
Votes
516
Votes
167
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 75
    Access to the entire native api
  • 47
    Support for native ios and android libraries
  • 46
    Angular 2.0 support
  • 46
    Support for javascript libraries
  • 44
    Native ux and performance
Cons
  • 5
    Lack of promotion
  • 1
    Slower Performance compared to competitors
Pros
  • 109
    ES6 code is shorter than traditional JS
  • 52
    Module System Standardized
  • 2
    Destructuring Assignment
  • 2
    Extremly compact
  • 1
    The database is recommended to use MySQL
Cons
  • 1
    Create Node.js
  • 1
    Suffers from baggage

What are some alternatives to NativeScript, ES6?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase