Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
ES6 vs Material UI: What are the differences?
Key Differences between ES6 and Material UI
ES6 and Material UI are two different technologies used in web development. While ES6 is a newer version of JavaScript, Material UI is a popular library for building user interfaces in React. Here are the key differences between ES6 and Material UI:
Syntax: ES6 introduces new syntax and features to JavaScript, such as arrow functions, classes, modules, and template literals. Material UI, on the other hand, provides a set of pre-built components and styling options that can be used in React applications.
Purpose: ES6 is a language specification that aims to enhance JavaScript and make it more efficient and readable. It provides developers with new ways to write cleaner and more maintainable code. Material UI, however, is a UI component library specifically designed for React applications. It provides ready-to-use components and styling options to help developers quickly build modern user interfaces.
Functionality: ES6 focuses on improving the core language features of JavaScript, such as adding new data types, iterators, and generators. Material UI, on the other hand, provides a wide range of UI components, including buttons, forms, navigation menus, and more. It also offers a powerful styling system that allows developers to customize the look and feel of their applications.
Integration: ES6 can be used with any JavaScript project, as it is a language specification. It can be integrated into web applications, Node.js projects, and even used in browser environments. Material UI is specifically designed for React applications and provides components that are optimized for use with React. It integrates seamlessly with React projects and follows the React component lifecycle.
Learning Curve: ES6 introduces new syntax and features that might require some learning for developers who are familiar with older versions of JavaScript. However, once mastered, ES6 can significantly improve the efficiency and readability of code. Material UI, on the other hand, has a learning curve associated with understanding its component structure and styling system. Developers need to learn the Material UI API and how to use its components effectively.
Community Support: ES6 has gained widespread adoption among developers and has good community support. There are many resources available online, such as documentation, tutorials, and forums, that can help developers learn and use ES6 effectively. Material UI also has a strong community and provides comprehensive documentation and examples. It has an active GitHub repository where users can report issues and contribute to the development of the library.
In summary, ES6 is a language specification that introduces new syntax and features to JavaScript, whereas Material UI is a library for building user interfaces in React. ES6 focuses on improving the core language, while Material UI provides pre-built components and styling options for React applications.
As our team will be building a web application, HTML5
and CSS3
are one of the standardized combinations to implement the structure and the styling of a webpage. Material-UI
comes with all sorts of predesigned web components such as buttons and dropdowns that will save us tons of development time. Since it is a component library designed for React, it suits our needs. However, we do acknowledge that predesigned components may sometimes cause pains especially when it comes to custom styling. To make our life even easier, we also adopted Tailwind CSS
. It is a CSS framework providing low-level utility classes that will act as building blocks when we create custom designs.
This post is a bit of an obvious one, as we have a web application, we obviously need to have HTML
and CSS
in our stack. Though specifically though, we can talk a bit about backward compatibility and the specific approaches we want to enforce in our codebase.
HTML
: Not much explanation here, you have to interact with HTML for a web app. We will stick to the latest standard: HTML 5
.
CSS
: Again if we want to style any of our components within he web, we have to use to style it. Though we will be taking advantage of JSS
in our code base and try to minimize the # of CSS stylesheets and include all our styling within the components themselves. This leaves the codebase much cleaner and makes it easier to find styles!
Babel
: We understand that not every browser is able to support the cool new features of the latest node/JS features (such as redue, filter, etc) seen in ES6
. We will make sure to have the correct Babel
configuration o make our application backward compatible.
Material UI (MUI)
: We need to make our user interface as intuitive and pretty as possible within his MVP, and the UI framework used by Google will provide us with exactly that. MUI provides pretty much all the UI components you would need and allows heavy customization as well. Its vast # of demos will allow us to add components quickly and not get too hung up on making UI components.
We will be using the latest version of create-react-app
which bundles most of the above along many necessary frameworks (e.g. Jest for testing) to get started quickly.
For our front-end, React is chosen because it is easy to develop with due to its reusable components and state functions, in addition to a lot of community support. Because React is popular, it would be easy to hire for it here at our company MusiCore. Our team also has experience with React already. React can be written with ES6 and ES6 has a lot of popularity and versatility when it comes to creating classes and efficient functions. Node.js will be used as a runtime environment to compile the code. Node.js also has many different types of open-source packages that can help automate some of the tasks we want to do for the application. CSS 3 will be used to style components and is the standard for that.
Optimize-js
I will not describe this tool a lot here, because it's already good done by author on github
I just want to mention that this tool wrap up all immediately-invoked functions or likely-to-be-invoked functions in parentheses what is do a great optimization a JavaScript
file for faster initial execution and parsing (based on my experience).
The performance of application where I've introduced optimize-js
improved on 20% in a common (tested in Chrome
and IE11
).
- Clarification on Readme to the optimize-js
- Some of Nolan thoughts on the virtues of compile-time optimizations can be found in "Parens and Performance" – counterpost
Is it maintaining now? - Unfortunately, no (but feel free to send PR)
Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.
https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085
Pros of ES6
- ES6 code is shorter than traditional JS109
- Module System Standardized52
- Extremly compact2
- Destructuring Assignment2
- The database is recommended to use MySQL1
Pros of Material-UI
- React141
- Material Design82
- Ui components60
- CSS framework30
- Component26
- Looks great15
- Responsive13
- Good documentation12
- LESS9
- Ui component8
- Open source7
- Flexible6
- Code examples6
- JSS5
- Supports old browsers out of the box3
- Interface3
- Angular3
- Very accessible3
- Fun3
- Typescript support2
- # of components2
- Designed for Server Side Rendering2
- Support for multiple styling systems1
- Accessibility1
- Easy to work with1
- Css1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of ES6
- Create Node.js1
- Suffers from baggage1
Cons of Material-UI
- Hard to learn. Bad documentation36
- Hard to customize29
- Hard to understand Docs22
- Bad performance9
- Extra library needed for date/time pickers7
- For editable table component need to use material-table7
- Typescript Support2
- # of components1