Ember.js vs Spring

Overview

Spring

Stacks3.9K

Followers4.8K

Votes1.1K

GitHub Stars59.1K

Forks38.8K

Ember.js

Stacks1.6K

Followers865

Votes775

GitHub Stars22.6K

Forks4.2K

Ember.js vs Spring: What are the differences?

Introduction

Ember.js and Spring are popular frameworks used for developing web applications. While both frameworks have their strengths, there are key differences that developers should consider when choosing between them.

Language compatibility: Ember.js is primarily designed for frontend development and uses JavaScript as its main programming language, making it ideal for building dynamic user interfaces. On the other hand, Spring is a backend framework that supports multiple programming languages such as Java and Kotlin, allowing developers to build robust server-side applications.
Application architecture: Ember.js follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, which helps in structuring the codebase and separating concerns. In contrast, Spring offers various architectural styles such as MVC, REST, and Microservices, giving developers flexibility in choosing the right architecture for their applications.
Community support: Ember.js has a strong and active community that provides continuous support, updates, and a wide range of plugins and addons to enhance productivity. Spring, being an enterprise-grade framework, has extensive documentation, community forums, and enterprise support for building scalable and secure applications.
Learning curve: Ember.js is known for its steep learning curve due to its conventions and patterns. However, once developers grasp the fundamentals, they can build complex web applications efficiently. Spring, on the other hand, has a more gradual learning curve, making it easier for beginners to get started and gradually advance their skills.
Integration with other technologies: Ember.js integrates seamlessly with other frontend technologies such as Handlebars, HTML, CSS, and jQuery, enabling developers to build interactive user interfaces. Spring, being a backend framework, integrates well with databases, security frameworks, messaging systems, and cloud services, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications.
Scalability: Ember.js is more suitable for small to medium-scale applications due to its focus on frontend development. In contrast, Spring provides robust support for building scalable applications by offering features like dependency injection, aspect-oriented programming, and support for distributed systems.

In Summary, when deciding between Ember.js and Spring, developers should consider factors like language compatibility, application architecture, community support, learning curve, integration with other technologies, and scalability to choose the framework that best suits their project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Spring, Ember.js

Tushar

Jan 7, 2021

Needs adviceon

Spring

Spring Boot

Django

Is learning Spring and Spring Boot for web apps back-end development is still relevant in 2021? Feel free to share your views with comparison to Django/Node.js/ ExpressJS or other frameworks.

Please share some good beginner resources to start learning about spring/spring boot framework to build the web apps.

827k views827k

Comments

neha

CEO at NMTechEdge

Sep 25, 2020

Review

Have you ever stuck with the question that which one is the best front-end framework for you?

With continuous web development progress, the trends of the latest front-end technologies are also continuously changing with more and more sophisticated web features. These top front-end frameworks and libraries have made your complex web tasks more flexible and efficient.

Check out top front end frameworks and their features at https://www.nmtechedge.com/2020/09/24/top-4-trending-front-end-frameworks-2020/

200k views200k

Comments

Anonymous

Dec 15, 2020

Needs adviceon

Spring

Java

Node.js

I am provided with the opportunity to learn one of these technologies during my training. I have prior experience with Spring and found it tough and still haven't figured out when to use what annotations among the thousands of annotations provided. On the other hand, I am very proficient in Java data structures and algorithms (custom comparators, etc.)

I have used Node.js and found it interesting, but I am wondering If I am taking the risk of choosing a framework that has a comparatively lesser scope in the future. One advantage I see with the node.js is the number of tutorials available and the ease with which I can code.

Please recommend which path to take. Is Spring learnable, or should I spend my energy on learning Node.js instead?

290k views290k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring	Ember.js
A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.	A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.
-	Creating web apps;Building UI
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.1K	GitHub Stars 22.6K
GitHub Forks 38.8K	GitHub Forks 4.2K
Stacks 3.9K	Stacks 1.6K
Followers 4.8K	Followers 865
Votes 1.1K	Votes 775
Pros & Cons
Pros 230 Java 157 Open source 136 Great community 123 Very powerful 114 Enterprise Cons 15 Draws you into its own ecosystem and bloat 4 Poor documentation 3 Java 3 Verbose configuration 2 Java is more verbose language in compare to python	Pros 126 Elegant 97 Quick to develop 83 Great mvc 82 Great community 73 Great router Cons 2 Too much convention, too little configuration 2 Very little flexibility 1 Hard to integrate with Non Ruby apps 1 Hard to use if your API isn't RESTful
Integrations
Java	Node.js AngularJS Bootstrap

What are some alternatives to Spring, Ember.js?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Ember.js vs Spring: What are the differences?

Introduction

Language compatibility: Ember.js is primarily designed for frontend development and uses JavaScript as its main programming language, making it ideal for building dynamic user interfaces. On the other hand, Spring is a backend framework that supports multiple programming languages such as Java and Kotlin, allowing developers to build robust server-side applications.
Application architecture: Ember.js follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, which helps in structuring the codebase and separating concerns. In contrast, Spring offers various architectural styles such as MVC, REST, and Microservices, giving developers flexibility in choosing the right architecture for their applications.
Community support: Ember.js has a strong and active community that provides continuous support, updates, and a wide range of plugins and addons to enhance productivity. Spring, being an enterprise-grade framework, has extensive documentation, community forums, and enterprise support for building scalable and secure applications.
Learning curve: Ember.js is known for its steep learning curve due to its conventions and patterns. However, once developers grasp the fundamentals, they can build complex web applications efficiently. Spring, on the other hand, has a more gradual learning curve, making it easier for beginners to get started and gradually advance their skills.
Integration with other technologies: Ember.js integrates seamlessly with other frontend technologies such as Handlebars, HTML, CSS, and jQuery, enabling developers to build interactive user interfaces. Spring, being a backend framework, integrates well with databases, security frameworks, messaging systems, and cloud services, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications.
Scalability: Ember.js is more suitable for small to medium-scale applications due to its focus on frontend development. In contrast, Spring provides robust support for building scalable applications by offering features like dependency injection, aspect-oriented programming, and support for distributed systems.

Ember.js vs Spring

Overview