Ember.js vs Scala: What are the differences?
Developers describe Ember.js as "A JavaScript framework for creating ambitious web apps". Ember.js is a JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; Ember.js does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI. On the other hand, Scala is detailed as "A pure-bred object-oriented language that runs on the JVM". Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.
Ember.js and Scala are primarily classified as "Javascript MVC Frameworks" and "Languages" tools respectively.
"Elegant", "Quick to develop" and "Great mvc" are the key factors why developers consider Ember.js; whereas "Static typing", "Jvm" and "Pattern-matching" are the primary reasons why Scala is favored.
Ember.js and Scala are both open source tools. Ember.js with 21K GitHub stars and 4.18K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Scala with 11.8K GitHub stars and 2.73K GitHub forks.
According to the StackShare community, Scala has a broader approval, being mentioned in 436 company stacks & 315 developers stacks; compared to Ember.js, which is listed in 293 company stacks and 75 developer stacks.