StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Text Editor
  5. Emacs vs Micro

Emacs vs Micro

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Emacs
Emacs
Stacks1.3K
Followers1.2K
Votes322
Micro
Micro
Stacks89
Followers55
Votes2

Emacs vs Micro: What are the differences?

Introduction: Emacs and Micro are both popular text editors used for coding and programming tasks. While they have similarities in their functionalities, there are key differences that set them apart.

  1. Customization: Emacs is known for its extensive customization options. Users can modify almost every aspect of Emacs, from keybindings to user interface elements. On the other hand, Micro focuses on simplicity and has fewer customization options compared to Emacs. It provides a minimalistic approach, making it easier for beginners to get started without overwhelming them with too many choices.

  2. Size and Performance: Emacs is a feature-rich editor known for its size and relatively high memory requirements. It offers a wide range of functionalities, including an integrated development environment, which makes it a powerful tool for advanced users. Micro, on the other hand, is designed to be lightweight and optimized for speed. It prioritizes fast startup times and minimal memory usage, making it a suitable choice for resource-constrained systems or users looking for a snappy editor.

  3. Plugin Ecosystem: Emacs has a vast and mature ecosystem of plugins, packages, and extensions. These plugins enhance Emacs' capabilities, providing additional functionality for various programming languages, version control systems, and more. In contrast, Micro has a more limited plugin ecosystem. Although it supports plugins, the available options are relatively less extensive compared to Emacs.

  4. User Interface: Emacs has a text-based user interface that can be fully customized and extended. It can run in a terminal or as a graphical application with additional features. On the other hand, Micro has a more traditional graphical user interface (GUI) by default, which may be more familiar for users transitioning from other text editors or word processors.

  5. Learning Curve: Emacs is known for its steep learning curve, especially for beginners. It offers a vast array of features and commands, making it a powerful but complex tool to master. Micro, on the other hand, aims to be more user-friendly, with a simpler and more intuitive interface that can help users get started quickly without requiring extensive customization or learning complex commands.

In summary, Emacs is a highly customizable and feature-rich text editor with a steep learning curve, suitable for advanced users who need extensive customization and a powerful integrated development environment. On the other hand, Micro is a lightweight and user-friendly editor with a focus on simplicity and performance, making it a good choice for beginners or those looking for a more streamlined editing experience.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Emacs
Emacs
Micro
Micro

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.

Micro is a framework for cloud native development. Micro addresses the key requirements for building cloud native services. It leverages the microservices architecture pattern and provides a set of services which act as the building blocks

Content-sensitive editing modes, including syntax coloring, for a variety of file types including plain text, source code, and HTML.;Complete built-in documentation, including a tutorial for new users.;Full Unicode support for nearly all human languages and their scripts.;Highly customizable, using Emacs Lisp code or a graphical interface.;A large number of extensions that add other functionality, including a project planner, mail and news reader, debugger interface, calendar, and more. Many of these extensions are distributed with GNU Emacs others are available separately.
Authentication; Config Management; Key-Value Storage; API Gateway; Service Discovery; Event Streaming
Statistics
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
89
Followers
1.2K
Followers
55
Votes
322
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 65
    Vast array of extensions
  • 44
    Have all you can imagine
  • 40
    Everything i need in one place
  • 39
    Portability
  • 32
    Customer config
Cons
  • 4
    So good and extensible, that one can get sidetracked
  • 4
    Hard to learn for beginners
  • 1
    Not default preinstalled in GNU/linux
Pros
  • 1
    Great flexibility
  • 1
    Nice tooling

What are some alternatives to Emacs, Micro?

Sublime Text

Sublime Text

Sublime Text is available for OS X, Windows and Linux. One license is all you need to use Sublime Text on every computer you own, no matter what operating system it uses. Sublime Text uses a custom UI toolkit, optimized for speed and beauty, while taking advantage of native functionality on each platform.

Atom

Atom

At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.

Vim

Vim

Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete feature set. Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX systems. Vim is distributed free as charityware.

Visual Studio Code

Visual Studio Code

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.

Notepad++

Notepad++

Notepad++ is a free (as in "free speech" and also as in "free beer") source code editor and Notepad replacement that supports several languages. Running in the MS Windows environment, its use is governed by GPL License.

Brackets

Brackets

With focused visual tools and preprocessor support, it is a modern text editor that makes it easy to design in the browser.

Neovim

Neovim

Neovim is a project that seeks to aggressively refactor Vim in order to: simplify maintenance and encourage contributions, split the work between multiple developers, enable the implementation of new/modern user interfaces without any modifications to the core source, and improve extensibility with a new plugin architecture.

VSCodium

VSCodium

It is a community-driven, freely-licensed binary distribution of Microsoft’s editor VSCode.

TextMate

TextMate

TextMate brings Apple's approach to operating systems into the world of text editors. By bridging UNIX underpinnings and GUI, TextMate cherry-picks the best of both worlds to the benefit of expert scripters and novice users alike.

Istio

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana