Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Emacs vs Micro: What are the differences?
Introduction: Emacs and Micro are both popular text editors used for coding and programming tasks. While they have similarities in their functionalities, there are key differences that set them apart.
Customization: Emacs is known for its extensive customization options. Users can modify almost every aspect of Emacs, from keybindings to user interface elements. On the other hand, Micro focuses on simplicity and has fewer customization options compared to Emacs. It provides a minimalistic approach, making it easier for beginners to get started without overwhelming them with too many choices.
Size and Performance: Emacs is a feature-rich editor known for its size and relatively high memory requirements. It offers a wide range of functionalities, including an integrated development environment, which makes it a powerful tool for advanced users. Micro, on the other hand, is designed to be lightweight and optimized for speed. It prioritizes fast startup times and minimal memory usage, making it a suitable choice for resource-constrained systems or users looking for a snappy editor.
Plugin Ecosystem: Emacs has a vast and mature ecosystem of plugins, packages, and extensions. These plugins enhance Emacs' capabilities, providing additional functionality for various programming languages, version control systems, and more. In contrast, Micro has a more limited plugin ecosystem. Although it supports plugins, the available options are relatively less extensive compared to Emacs.
User Interface: Emacs has a text-based user interface that can be fully customized and extended. It can run in a terminal or as a graphical application with additional features. On the other hand, Micro has a more traditional graphical user interface (GUI) by default, which may be more familiar for users transitioning from other text editors or word processors.
Learning Curve: Emacs is known for its steep learning curve, especially for beginners. It offers a vast array of features and commands, making it a powerful but complex tool to master. Micro, on the other hand, aims to be more user-friendly, with a simpler and more intuitive interface that can help users get started quickly without requiring extensive customization or learning complex commands.
In summary, Emacs is a highly customizable and feature-rich text editor with a steep learning curve, suitable for advanced users who need extensive customization and a powerful integrated development environment. On the other hand, Micro is a lightweight and user-friendly editor with a focus on simplicity and performance, making it a good choice for beginners or those looking for a more streamlined editing experience.
Pros of Emacs
- Vast array of extensions65
- Have all you can imagine44
- Everything i need in one place40
- Portability39
- Customer config32
- Your config works on any platform16
- Low memory consumption13
- Perfect for monsters11
- All life inside one program10
- Extendable, portable, fast - all at your fingertips8
- Enables extremely rapid keyboard-only navigation6
- Widely-used keybindings (e.g. by bash)5
- Extensible in Lisp5
- Runs everywhere important5
- FOSS Software4
- Powerful multilanguage IDE4
- Git integration4
- May be old but always reliable4
- Asynchronous3
- Powerful UI3
- Huge ecosystem1
Pros of Micro
- Great flexibility1
- Nice tooling1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Emacs
- So good and extensible, that one can get sidetracked4
- Hard to learn for beginners4
- Not default preinstalled in GNU/linux1