StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Electron vs Spring-Boot

Electron vs Spring-Boot

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Stacks26.7K
Followers24.3K
Votes1.0K
GitHub Stars78.9K
Forks41.6K
Electron
Electron
Stacks11.6K
Followers10.0K
Votes148

Electron vs Spring-Boot: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Electron and Spring Boot, two popular frameworks used for developing web applications. Electron is a framework for building cross-platform desktop applications using web technologies, while Spring Boot is a framework for creating production-ready, stand-alone Spring-based applications. Let's dive into the key differences between them.

  1. Architecture: Electron follows a client-side architecture where the entire application runs on the client's computer. It utilizes web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to build the user interface. On the other hand, Spring Boot follows a server-side architecture where the application logic runs on the server and the client interacts with it through web browsers or other clients.

  2. Platform Compatibility: Electron is designed to create desktop applications that run on multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. It provides a consistent user experience across different platforms. In contrast, Spring Boot is a Java-based framework that can be used to develop applications that run on Java Virtual Machines (JVMs). It is compatible with any operating system that supports Java.

  3. Application Type: Electron is primarily used for building desktop applications that have direct access to the underlying system resources, such as file systems and native APIs. It is suitable for creating applications like text editors, media players, and chat applications. In contrast, Spring Boot is commonly used for creating web applications that run on a server and are accessed through web browsers. It is suitable for developing applications like e-commerce websites, social media platforms, and content management systems.

  4. Development Language: Electron applications are built using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, making it accessible to developers with web development skills. It allows developers to leverage their existing knowledge and tools. On the other hand, Spring Boot applications are written in Java, which is a robust and widely used programming language. Developers need to have a good understanding of Java and its associated frameworks to work with Spring Boot effectively.

  5. Tooling and Ecosystem: Electron provides a rich set of tools and libraries specifically designed for building desktop applications. It has a vibrant and active community that contributes to its ecosystem by creating plugins, extensions, and frameworks. Spring Boot, being a part of the larger Spring framework ecosystem, offers a wide range of tools and libraries for building web applications. It benefits from the extensive Spring community and its well-established ecosystem.

  6. Deployment and Scalability: Electron applications need to be bundled with all their dependencies and distributed as standalone executables, which makes the deployment process easier. However, due to their client-side architecture, they may not scale well for complex and resource-intensive applications. In contrast, Spring Boot applications can be deployed on a wide range of servers, including cloud platforms, and can be scaled horizontally or vertically to handle high traffic and workload efficiently.

In summary, Electron is a framework for building cross-platform desktop applications using web technologies, while Spring Boot is a Java-based framework for creating production-ready web applications. Electron focuses on client-side architecture, platform compatibility, and building desktop applications, while Spring Boot emphasizes server-side architecture, Java development, and web application development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Spring Boot, Electron

Eva
Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceonJavaJavaSpring BootSpring BootJavaScriptJavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k
Comments
Slimane
Slimane

Jul 9, 2020

Needs adviceonSpring BootSpring BootNestJSNestJSNode.jsNode.js

I am currently planning to build a project from scratch. I will be using Angular as front-end framework, but for the back-end I am not sure which framework to use between Spring Boot and NestJS. I have worked with Spring Boot before, but my new project contains a lot of I/O operations, in fact it will show a daily report. I thought about the new Spring Web Reactive Framework but given the idea that Node.js is the most popular on handling non blocking I/O I am planning to start learning NestJS since it is based on Angular philosophy and TypeScript which I am familiar with. Looking forward to hear from you dear Community.

917k views917k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

Sep 15, 2020

Needs adviceonKotlinKotlinC#C#DjangoDjango

Hi

I’ve been using Django for the last year on and off to do my backend API. I’m getting a bit frustrated with the Django REST framework with the setup of the serializers and Django for the lack of web sockets. I’m considering either Spring or .NET Core. I’m familiar with Kotlin and C# but I’ve not built any substantial projects with them. I like OOP, building a desktop app, web API, and also the potential to get a job in the future or building a tool at work to manage my documents, dashboard and processes point cloud data.

I’m familiar with c/cpp, TypeScript.

I would love your insights on where I should go.

617k views617k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Electron
Electron

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

-
Use HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Chromium and Node.js to build your app.;Electron is open source; maintained by GitHub and an active community.;Electron apps build and run on Mac, Windows, and Linux.;Automatic updates;Crash reporting;Windows installers;Debugging & profiling;Native menus & notifications
Statistics
GitHub Stars
78.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
41.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
26.7K
Stacks
11.6K
Followers
24.3K
Followers
10.0K
Votes
1.0K
Votes
148
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 149
    Powerful and handy
  • 134
    Easy setup
  • 128
    Java
  • 90
    Spring
  • 85
    Fast
Cons
  • 23
    Heavy weight
  • 18
    Annotation ceremony
  • 13
    Java
  • 11
    Many config files needed
  • 5
    Reactive
Pros
  • 69
    Easy to make rich cross platform desktop applications
  • 53
    Open source
  • 14
    Great looking apps such as Slack and Visual Studio Code
  • 8
    Because it's cross platform
  • 4
    Use Node.js in the Main Process
Cons
  • 19
    Uses a lot of memory
  • 8
    User experience never as good as a native app
  • 4
    Does not native
  • 4
    No proper documentation
  • 1
    Wrong reference for dom inspection
Integrations
Spring
Spring
Java
Java
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Spring Boot, Electron?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase