Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

ejabberd

33
48
+ 1
0
Openfire

13
46
+ 1
0
Add tool

Openfire vs ejabberd: What are the differences?

Introduction

Openfire and ejabberd are both popular instant messaging (IM) servers that provide the infrastructure for real-time communication using the XMPP (Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol) protocol. Despite serving the same purpose, these two platforms have several key differences that set them apart. In this section, we will highlight the main differences between Openfire and ejabberd.

  1. Scalability: Openfire is known for its easy setup and efficient operation, making it a suitable choice for small to medium-sized deployments. On the other hand, ejabberd offers robust scalability and high-performance capabilities, making it a preferred option for larger and more complex deployments that require handling thousands or even millions of online users.

  2. Ease of Administration: Openfire prioritizes simplicity, providing a user-friendly web-based administration console with a straightforward setup and configuration process. ejabberd, while still offering a web-based administration interface, is considered more complex to set up and manage due to its extensive configuration options and advanced features.

  3. Clustering and Load Balancing: ejabberd excels in its native support for clustering and load balancing, allowing for seamless distribution of load across multiple servers and providing increased reliability and scalability. Openfire, on the other hand, lacks built-in support for clustering and load balancing, requiring additional configuration and setup to achieve similar results.

  4. Performance: ejabberd is known for its exceptional performance, particularly in scenarios that require handling a large number of concurrent connections and heavy traffic loads. Openfire, while still performant, may experience performance degradation when subjected to high loads, especially in deployments with a large number of concurrent users.

  5. Community and Support: Openfire benefits from a vibrant and active community, making it easy to find resources, plugins, and community-driven extensions. ejabberd also has an active community but has a smaller user base compared to Openfire, resulting in a relatively narrower range of community-driven resources and extensions.

  6. Development and Extensibility: Openfire has a more open and flexible plugin architecture, enabling developers to extend its functionality by developing custom plugins or utilizing existing ones. ejabberd, while still extensible, has a more limited plugin ecosystem, requiring a deeper understanding of the platform's internals for developing custom extensions.

In summary, Openfire and ejabberd differ in terms of scalability, ease of administration, clustering and load balancing capabilities, performance, community support, and development/extensibility options. These differences make each platform more suitable for specific use cases and deployment scenarios.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is ejabberd?

It is a distributed, fault-tolerant technology that allows the creation of large-scale instant messaging applications. The server can reliably support thousands of simultaneous users on a single node and has been designed to provide exceptional standards of fault tolerance.

What is Openfire?

It is a real time collaboration (RTC) server. It uses the only widely adopted open protocol for instant messaging, XMPP (also called Jabber). It is incredibly easy to setup and administer, but offers rock-solid security and performance.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use ejabberd?
What companies use Openfire?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with ejabberd?
What tools integrate with Openfire?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to ejabberd and Openfire?
Firebase
Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
MySQL
The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.
MongoDB
MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
See all alternatives