StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Ehcache vs MongoDB

Ehcache vs MongoDB

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MongoDB
MongoDB
Stacks96.6K
Followers82.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars27.7K
Forks5.7K
Ehcache
Ehcache
Stacks616
Followers160
Votes4
GitHub Stars2.1K
Forks585

Ehcache vs MongoDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of data storage and caching, Ehcache and MongoDB are two prominent players that offer distinct features and capabilities. Understanding the key differences between these two technologies is crucial for making informed decisions when it comes to managing and accessing data. Below are the key differences highlighted between Ehcache and MongoDB.

  1. Data Structure: Ehcache is an in-memory data store that primarily stores data in key-value pairs, making it ideal for caching frequently accessed data for faster retrieval. On the other hand, MongoDB is a document-oriented database that stores data in flexible, JSON-like documents, allowing for complex data structures and relationships.

  2. Scalability: MongoDB is designed to scale horizontally by adding more servers to distribute the data load and increase performance. In contrast, Ehcache is more suitable for vertical scaling, where additional resources are added to a single server to handle increased data storage and access requirements.

  3. Consistency: Ehcache focuses on providing near real-time data access with strong consistency guarantees, making it suitable for applications that require immediate and consistent data retrieval. MongoDB, being a NoSQL database, offers eventual consistency by default, allowing for higher availability and partition tolerance at the expense of immediate data consistency.

  4. Query Language: MongoDB uses a rich query language that supports complex queries, aggregations, and text search capabilities, making it versatile for a wide range of data retrieval operations. Ehcache, on the other hand, offers a simple key-based retrieval mechanism, limiting its query capabilities to direct key-value lookups without complex querying functionalities.

  5. Persistence: MongoDB provides built-in support for data persistence by writing data to disk, ensuring durability and data integrity in case of failures or crashes. In comparison, Ehcache relies on in-memory storage by default, requiring additional configurations or modules for persistent storage, making it more susceptible to data loss in certain scenarios.

  6. Use Cases: Ehcache is typically used for caching frequently accessed data to improve application performance, while MongoDB is preferred for storing, managing, and querying large volumes of data in a scalable and flexible manner, making it suitable for a wide range of use cases including web applications, analytics, and content management systems.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Ehcache and MongoDB is essential for selecting the right technology based on specific requirements related to data storage, access patterns, scalability, and consistency needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on MongoDB, Ehcache

George
George

Student

Mar 18, 2020

Needs adviceonPostgreSQLPostgreSQLPythonPythonDjangoDjango

Hello everyone,

Well, I want to build a large-scale project, but I do not know which ORDBMS to choose. The app should handle real-time operations, not chatting, but things like future scheduling or reminders. It should be also really secure, fast and easy to use. And last but not least, should I use them both. I mean PostgreSQL with Python / Django and MongoDB with Node.js? Or would it be better to use PostgreSQL with Node.js?

*The project is going to use React for the front-end and GraphQL is going to be used for the API.

Thank you all. Any answer or advice would be really helpful!

620k views620k
Comments
Ido
Ido

Mar 6, 2020

Decided

My data was inherently hierarchical, but there was not enough content in each level of the hierarchy to justify a relational DB (SQL) with a one-to-many approach. It was also far easier to share data between the frontend (Angular), backend (Node.js) and DB (MongoDB) as they all pass around JSON natively. This allowed me to skip the translation layer from relational to hierarchical. You do need to think about correct indexes in MongoDB, and make sure the objects have finite size. For instance, an object in your DB shouldn't have a property which is an array that grows over time, without limit. In addition, I did use MySQL for other types of data, such as a catalog of products which (a) has a lot of data, (b) flat and not hierarchical, (c) needed very fast queries.

575k views575k
Comments
Mike
Mike

Mar 20, 2020

Needs advice

We Have thousands of .pdf docs generated from the same form but with lots of variability. We need to extract data from open text and more important - from tables inside the docs. The output of Couchbase/Mongo will be one row per document for backend processing. ADOBE renders the tables in an unusable form.

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

MongoDB
MongoDB
Ehcache
Ehcache

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

Ehcache is an open source, standards-based cache for boosting performance, offloading your database, and simplifying scalability. It's the most widely-used Java-based cache because it's robust, proven, and full-featured. Ehcache scales from in-process, with one or more nodes, all the way to mixed in-process/out-of-process configurations with terabyte-sized caches.

Flexible data model, expressive query language, secondary indexes, replication, auto-sharding, in-place updates, aggregation, GridFS
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
27.7K
GitHub Stars
2.1K
GitHub Forks
5.7K
GitHub Forks
585
Stacks
96.6K
Stacks
616
Followers
82.0K
Followers
160
Votes
4.1K
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 829
    Document-oriented storage
  • 594
    No sql
  • 554
    Ease of use
  • 465
    Fast
  • 410
    High performance
Cons
  • 6
    Very slowly for connected models that require joins
  • 3
    Not acid compliant
  • 2
    Proprietary query language
Pros
  • 1
    Way Faster than Redis and Elasticache Redis
  • 1
    Container doesn't have to be running for local tests
  • 1
    Simpler to run in testing environment
  • 1
    Easy setup

What are some alternatives to MongoDB, Ehcache?

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase