StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Mvc Frameworks
  5. Durandal vs jsf

Durandal vs jsf

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Durandal
Durandal
Stacks31
Followers36
Votes20
GitHub Stars1.7K
Forks371
JSF
JSF
Stacks138
Followers223
Votes4

Durandal vs jsf: What are the differences?

What is Durandal? Single Page Apps Done Right. Durandal is a cross-device, cross-platform client framework written in JS and designed to make Single Page Applications (SPAs) easy to create and maintain.

What is jsf? It is use for building component-based web interfaces. It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community.

Durandal and jsf can be categorized as "Javascript MVC Frameworks" tools.

Durandal is an open source tool with 1.78K GitHub stars and 392 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Durandal's open source repository on GitHub.

GameDuell, Universidade CEUMA, and Maps S.A. are some of the popular companies that use jsf, whereas Durandal is used by easygenerator, Artist Growth LLC, and MMG. jsf has a broader approval, being mentioned in 11 company stacks & 15 developers stacks; compared to Durandal, which is listed in 5 company stacks and 17 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Durandal
Durandal
JSF
JSF

Durandal is a cross-device, cross-platform client framework written in JS and designed to make Single Page Applications (SPAs) easy to create and maintain.

It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community

JS & HTML modularity; Simple app lifecycle; Eventing, modals, message boxes, etc; Navigation & screen state management;Consistent async programming w/ promises; App bundling and optimization; Use any backend technology; Built on top of jQuery, Knockout & requireJS; Integrates with popular CSS libraries such as Bootstrap and Foundation; Make your own templatable and data-bindable widgets; Fully testable
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
371
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
31
Stacks
138
Followers
36
Followers
223
Votes
20
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to learn
  • 3
    UI components
  • 2
    Javascript
  • 2
    Free
  • 2
    Customizable
Pros
  • 2
    Rich and comprehensive Request Life-cycle
  • 1
    Very Mature UI framework
  • 1
    Server Side component
Integrations
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Foundation
Foundation
Java
Java
Java EE
Java EE

What are some alternatives to Durandal, JSF?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Mithril

Mithril

Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.

Quarkus

Quarkus

It tailors your application for GraalVM and HotSpot. Amazingly fast boot time, incredibly low RSS memory (not just heap size!) offering near instant scale up and high density memory utilization in container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. We use a technique we call compile time boot.

Marionette

Marionette

It is a JavaScript library with a RESTful JSON interface and is based on the Model–view–presenter application design paradigm. Backbone is known for being lightweight, as its only hard dependency is on one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, plus jQuery for use of the full library.

Ampersand.js

Ampersand.js

We <3 Backbone.js at &yet. It’s brilliantly simple and solves many common problems in developing clientside applications. But we missed the focused simplicity of tiny modules in node-land. We wanted something similar in style and philosophy, but that fully embraced tiny modules, npm, and browserify. Ampersand.js is a well-defined approach to combining (get it?) a series of intentionally tiny modules.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase