StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Drone.io vs TeamCity

Drone.io vs TeamCity

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Drone.io
Drone.io
Stacks884
Followers456
Votes258
TeamCity
TeamCity
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.1K
Votes316

Drone.io vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare Drone.io and TeamCity, two popular continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) platforms. Both Drone.io and TeamCity are used to automate the build, test, and deployment processes of software development projects. However, there are specific differences between the two that set them apart. Let's explore these differences in detail below.

  1. Deployment Options: Drone.io supports container-based deployments utilizing Docker, Kubernetes, and other containerization technologies. On the other hand, TeamCity allows deployments to traditional servers, virtual machines, and cloud platforms, providing greater flexibility in deployment options.

  2. Pipeline Configuration: Drone.io emphasizes the use of a declarative pipeline syntax defined via a YAML file, making it easier to maintain and version control the build and deployment process. In contrast, TeamCity relies on a graphical user interface (GUI) to configure the pipelines, which offers advantages in visualizing and managing complex build workflows.

  3. Plugin Ecosystem: TeamCity has a well-established plugin ecosystem, offering a wide range of integrations and extensions to enhance its functionality. It provides extensive support for various build tools, version control systems, and third-party integrations. While Drone.io also supports plugins, the ecosystem is relatively smaller in comparison and may require custom development for specific integration requirements.

  4. Scalability and Performance: TeamCity is designed to handle large-scale enterprise projects with distributed build agents and supports high concurrency with its build grid. It provides advanced load balancing and fault-tolerant capabilities to ensure optimal performance. Drone.io, on the other hand, is known for its lightweight and scalable architecture, making it a preferred choice for smaller projects or organizations looking for a more minimalistic CI/CD solution.

  5. Pricing Model: Both Drone.io and TeamCity offer various pricing models, including free and commercial editions. Drone.io follows an open-source model and provides a community edition with essential features for free. Additional features and enterprise-grade support can be accessed through paid plans. On the contrary, TeamCity offers a free version limited to a certain number of build configurations, and its pricing is based on the number of build agents and additional features required.

  6. Integration with VCS: Drone.io offers seamless integration with various version control systems (VCS), including Git, Mercurial, and Subversion. It provides native support for pull request and branch-based workflows, enabling efficient collaboration and code review processes. TeamCity also integrates well with popular VCS, but its support for specific VCS may necessitate additional plugins or configuration.

In summary, Drone.io and TeamCity differ in terms of their deployment options, pipeline configuration methods, plugin ecosystems, scalability, pricing models, and integration with version control systems. These differences make the platforms suitable for different use cases and organizational requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Drone.io, TeamCity

Somnath
Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceonCircleCICircleCIDrone.ioDrone.ioGitHub ActionsGitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Drone.io
Drone.io
TeamCity
TeamCity

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Free for open-source;GitHub, BitBucket integration;Browser testing;Deplot with Amazon, Heroku, Google AppEngine;Flexible scripting;Team billing;
Automate code analyzing, compiling, and testing processes, with having instant feedback on build progress, problems, and test failures, all in a simple, intuitive web-interface; Simplified setup: create projects from just a VCS repository URL;Run multiple builds and tests under different configurations and platforms simultaneously; Make sure your team sustains an uninterrupted workflow with the help of Pretested commits and Personal builds; Have build history insight with customizable statistics on build duration, success rate, code quality, and custom metrics; Enable cost-effective on-demand build infrastructure scaling thanks to tight integration with Amazon EC2; Easily extend TeamCity functionality and add new integrations using Java API; Great visual project representation. Track any changes made by any user in the system, filter projects and choose style of visual change status representation;
Statistics
Stacks
884
Stacks
1.2K
Followers
456
Followers
1.1K
Votes
258
Votes
316
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 51
    Open source
  • 50
    Built on docker
  • 27
    Free for open source
  • 23
    GitHub integration
  • 18
    Easy Setup
Cons
  • 3
    Very basic documentation
Pros
  • 61
    Easy to configure
  • 37
    Reliable and high-quality
  • 32
    Github integration
  • 32
    User friendly
  • 32
    On premise
Cons
  • 3
    High costs for more than three build agents
  • 2
    User-friendly
  • 2
    User friendly
  • 2
    Proprietary
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Heroku
Heroku
GitHub
GitHub
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
dotCloud
dotCloud
Slack
Slack

What are some alternatives to Drone.io, TeamCity?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Appveyor

Appveyor

AppVeyor aims to give powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment tools to every .NET developer without the hassle of setting up and maintaining their own build server.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana