Drone.io vs GoCD

Overview

Drone.io

Stacks884

Followers456

Votes258

GoCD

Stacks205

Followers325

Votes207

GitHub Stars7.3K

Forks980

Drone.io vs GoCD: What are the differences?

Drone.io and GoCD are both continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) tools used by organizations for automated development processes. Below are the key differences between Drone.io and GoCD.

Architecture: Drone.io follows a container-native approach, utilizing Docker containers for its build processes, providing scalability and reproducibility. On the other hand, GoCD has a more traditional agent-based architecture where agents are responsible for executing build tasks.
Ease of Use: Drone.io is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it a popular choice among smaller teams or startups due to its straightforward setup and configuration. In contrast, GoCD is more complex and offers advanced features suitable for enterprise-level applications, requiring more expertise for setup and management.
Plugin Ecosystem: Drone.io has a smaller plugin ecosystem compared to GoCD but allows users to create custom plugins easily due to its open-source nature and lightweight architecture. GoCD, on the other hand, has a robust plugin ecosystem with various integrations available out of the box for popular tools and technologies.
Pipeline Configuration: In Drone.io, pipelines are configured using a simple YAML file in the repository, keeping the configuration close to the codebase and promoting versioning of the pipeline along with the code changes. GoCD uses a graphical interface for pipeline configuration, providing a visual representation of the workflow, which can be advantageous for teams requiring a visual overview of their CI/CD processes.
Scalability: Drone.io is highly scalable due to its containerized architecture, allowing users to scale build jobs easily by spinning up new containers. GoCD is also scalable but may require more effort in setting up additional agents for handling increased workload, especially in complex enterprise environments.
Community Support: Drone.io has a growing community of users and contributors who actively support the project and provide assistance through forums and documentation. GoCD, being an established tool, has a larger and more mature community with extensive resources and support available for users seeking assistance or troubleshooting guidance.

In Summary, Drone.io and GoCD differ in their architecture, ease of use, plugin ecosystem, pipeline configuration, scalability, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Drone.io, GoCD

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Mohammad Hossein

Chief Technology Officer at Planally

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Docker

I'm open to anything. just want something that break less and doesn't need me to pay for it, and can be hosted on Docker. our scripting language is powershell core. so it's better to support it. also we are building dotnet core in our pipeline, so if they have anything related that helps with the CI would be nice.

545k views545k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Drone.io	GoCD
Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.	GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.
Free for open-source;GitHub, BitBucket integration;Browser testing;Deplot with Amazon, Heroku, Google AppEngine;Flexible scripting;Team billing;	Model complex workflows with dependency management and parallel execution; Easy to pass once-built binaries between stages; Visibility into your end-to-end workflow. Track a change from commit to deploy at a glance; Manual triggers allow deployment any version at anytime. And it's securable and auditable; Run tests written in most languages or frameworks, provides informative testing report; Compare both files and commit messages across any two arbitrary builds; Eliminate Bottlenecks by providing trivial parallel execution across pipelines, platforms, versions, branches, etc.; Easily reuse pipeline configurations via template system.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 7.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 980
Stacks 884	Stacks 205
Followers 456	Followers 325
Votes 258	Votes 207
Pros & Cons
Pros 51 Open source 50 Built on docker 27 Free for open source 23 GitHub integration 18 Easy Setup Cons 3 Very basic documentation	Pros 32 Open source 27 Pipeline dependencies 25 Pipeline structures 22 Can run jobs in parallel 20 Very flexible Cons 2 Lack of plugins 2 Horrible ui 1 No support
Integrations
Docker Bitbucket Google App Engine Heroku GitHub Amazon S3 dotCloud	Docker Kubernetes Slack

What are some alternatives to Drone.io, GoCD?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Appveyor

AppVeyor aims to give powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment tools to every .NET developer without the hassle of setting up and maintaining their own build server.

Related Comparisons

Drone.io vs GoCD: What are the differences?

Architecture: Drone.io follows a container-native approach, utilizing Docker containers for its build processes, providing scalability and reproducibility. On the other hand, GoCD has a more traditional agent-based architecture where agents are responsible for executing build tasks.
Ease of Use: Drone.io is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it a popular choice among smaller teams or startups due to its straightforward setup and configuration. In contrast, GoCD is more complex and offers advanced features suitable for enterprise-level applications, requiring more expertise for setup and management.
Plugin Ecosystem: Drone.io has a smaller plugin ecosystem compared to GoCD but allows users to create custom plugins easily due to its open-source nature and lightweight architecture. GoCD, on the other hand, has a robust plugin ecosystem with various integrations available out of the box for popular tools and technologies.
Pipeline Configuration: In Drone.io, pipelines are configured using a simple YAML file in the repository, keeping the configuration close to the codebase and promoting versioning of the pipeline along with the code changes. GoCD uses a graphical interface for pipeline configuration, providing a visual representation of the workflow, which can be advantageous for teams requiring a visual overview of their CI/CD processes.
Scalability: Drone.io is highly scalable due to its containerized architecture, allowing users to scale build jobs easily by spinning up new containers. GoCD is also scalable but may require more effort in setting up additional agents for handling increased workload, especially in complex enterprise environments.
Community Support: Drone.io has a growing community of users and contributors who actively support the project and provide assistance through forums and documentation. GoCD, being an established tool, has a larger and more mature community with extensive resources and support available for users seeking assistance or troubleshooting guidance.

In Summary, Drone.io and GoCD differ in their architecture, ease of use, plugin ecosystem, pipeline configuration, scalability, and community support.

Drone.io vs GoCD

Overview