.NET vs Material UI

Overview

.NET

Stacks15.4K

Followers5.9K

Votes1.9K

GitHub Stars21.7K

Forks4.9K

Material-UI

Stacks2.7K

Followers3.7K

Votes445

.NET vs Material UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will discuss the key differences between .NET and Material UI.

Flexibility and Purpose: .NET is a framework created by Microsoft for building various types of applications, including web, desktop, and mobile. On the other hand, Material UI is a set of React components that follow the Material Design guidelines. While .NET provides a full-fledged framework for developing applications, Material UI focuses specifically on providing pre-designed UI components.
Language and Ecosystem: .NET primarily uses C# as its programming language, which is a strongly typed and compiled language. Material UI, on the other hand, is built for React, a JavaScript library for building user interfaces. This means that Material UI can be used with other JavaScript frameworks and libraries, while .NET is more closely integrated with the Microsoft ecosystem.
Design Philosophy: .NET emphasizes a more traditional and structured approach to software development, with concepts like object-oriented programming and a heavy reliance on code. Material UI, on the other hand, follows the principles of Material Design, which focuses on simplicity, visual hierarchy, and responsive design. Material UI provides ready-to-use components with configurable options, aiming to make it easier for developers to follow design principles.
Component Library vs. Full Framework: Material UI is primarily a component library, providing reusable UI components that can be easily integrated into a project. On the other hand, .NET is a full framework that provides a wide range of functionalities, including database connectivity, security features, and more. While Material UI focuses on the UI layer, .NET covers all aspects of application development.
Community and Support: .NET has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, resources, and support from Microsoft. Material UI, being built for React, benefits from the wider React ecosystem and community. Both communities provide updates, bug fixes, and new features regularly.
Platform Independence: .NET is a framework primarily designed for Windows-based systems, although it has expanded to support other platforms like Linux and macOS. Material UI, being built on top of React, is platform-independent and can be used to build applications for various platforms.

In summary, .NET is a comprehensive framework for application development, while Material UI is a component library that provides pre-designed UI components following the Material Design guidelines. .NET is more focused on traditional software development, while Material UI emphasizes visual design and simplicity.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on .NET, Material-UI

Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k

Comments

Xinyi

Software Developer at DCSIL

Oct 9, 2020

Decided

As our team will be building a web application, HTML5 and CSS3 are one of the standardized combinations to implement the structure and the styling of a webpage. Material-UI comes with all sorts of predesigned web components such as buttons and dropdowns that will save us tons of development time. Since it is a component library designed for React, it suits our needs. However, we do acknowledge that predesigned components may sometimes cause pains especially when it comes to custom styling. To make our life even easier, we also adopted Tailwind CSS. It is a CSS framework providing low-level utility classes that will act as building blocks when we create custom designs.

359k views359k

Comments

Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

767k views767k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

.NET	Material-UI
.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.	Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.
Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.	Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
Statistics
GitHub Stars 21.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 4.9K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 15.4K	Stacks 2.7K
Followers 5.9K	Followers 3.7K
Votes 1.9K	Votes 445
Pros & Cons
Pros 273 Tight integration with visual studio 262 Stable code 191 Great community 184 Reliable and strongly typed server side language. 141 Microsoft Cons 13 C# 12 Too expensive to deploy and maintain 8 Microsoft dependable systems 8 Microsoft itself 5 Hard learning curve	Pros 141 React 82 Material Design 60 Ui components 30 CSS framework 26 Component Cons 36 Hard to learn. Bad documentation 29 Hard to customize 22 Hard to understand Docs 9 Bad performance 7 Extra library needed for date/time pickers
Integrations
C# Microsoft Azure F# Xamarin Visual Basic	React Emotion Next.js styled-components Node.js

What are some alternatives to .NET, Material-UI?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

.NET vs Material UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will discuss the key differences between .NET and Material UI.

Flexibility and Purpose: .NET is a framework created by Microsoft for building various types of applications, including web, desktop, and mobile. On the other hand, Material UI is a set of React components that follow the Material Design guidelines. While .NET provides a full-fledged framework for developing applications, Material UI focuses specifically on providing pre-designed UI components.
Language and Ecosystem: .NET primarily uses C# as its programming language, which is a strongly typed and compiled language. Material UI, on the other hand, is built for React, a JavaScript library for building user interfaces. This means that Material UI can be used with other JavaScript frameworks and libraries, while .NET is more closely integrated with the Microsoft ecosystem.
Design Philosophy: .NET emphasizes a more traditional and structured approach to software development, with concepts like object-oriented programming and a heavy reliance on code. Material UI, on the other hand, follows the principles of Material Design, which focuses on simplicity, visual hierarchy, and responsive design. Material UI provides ready-to-use components with configurable options, aiming to make it easier for developers to follow design principles.
Component Library vs. Full Framework: Material UI is primarily a component library, providing reusable UI components that can be easily integrated into a project. On the other hand, .NET is a full framework that provides a wide range of functionalities, including database connectivity, security features, and more. While Material UI focuses on the UI layer, .NET covers all aspects of application development.
Community and Support: .NET has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, resources, and support from Microsoft. Material UI, being built for React, benefits from the wider React ecosystem and community. Both communities provide updates, bug fixes, and new features regularly.
Platform Independence: .NET is a framework primarily designed for Windows-based systems, although it has expanded to support other platforms like Linux and macOS. Material UI, being built on top of React, is platform-independent and can be used to build applications for various platforms.

.NET vs Material UI

Overview

.NET vs Material UI: What are the differences?