Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
.NET vs Material UI: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this Markdown document, we will discuss the key differences between .NET and Material UI.
Flexibility and Purpose: .NET is a framework created by Microsoft for building various types of applications, including web, desktop, and mobile. On the other hand, Material UI is a set of React components that follow the Material Design guidelines. While .NET provides a full-fledged framework for developing applications, Material UI focuses specifically on providing pre-designed UI components.
Language and Ecosystem: .NET primarily uses C# as its programming language, which is a strongly typed and compiled language. Material UI, on the other hand, is built for React, a JavaScript library for building user interfaces. This means that Material UI can be used with other JavaScript frameworks and libraries, while .NET is more closely integrated with the Microsoft ecosystem.
Design Philosophy: .NET emphasizes a more traditional and structured approach to software development, with concepts like object-oriented programming and a heavy reliance on code. Material UI, on the other hand, follows the principles of Material Design, which focuses on simplicity, visual hierarchy, and responsive design. Material UI provides ready-to-use components with configurable options, aiming to make it easier for developers to follow design principles.
Component Library vs. Full Framework: Material UI is primarily a component library, providing reusable UI components that can be easily integrated into a project. On the other hand, .NET is a full framework that provides a wide range of functionalities, including database connectivity, security features, and more. While Material UI focuses on the UI layer, .NET covers all aspects of application development.
Community and Support: .NET has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, resources, and support from Microsoft. Material UI, being built for React, benefits from the wider React ecosystem and community. Both communities provide updates, bug fixes, and new features regularly.
Platform Independence: .NET is a framework primarily designed for Windows-based systems, although it has expanded to support other platforms like Linux and macOS. Material UI, being built on top of React, is platform-independent and can be used to build applications for various platforms.
In summary, .NET is a comprehensive framework for application development, while Material UI is a component library that provides pre-designed UI components following the Material Design guidelines. .NET is more focused on traditional software development, while Material UI emphasizes visual design and simplicity.
As our team will be building a web application, HTML5 and CSS3 are one of the standardized combinations to implement the structure and the styling of a webpage. Material-UI comes with all sorts of predesigned web components such as buttons and dropdowns that will save us tons of development time. Since it is a component library designed for React, it suits our needs. However, we do acknowledge that predesigned components may sometimes cause pains especially when it comes to custom styling. To make our life even easier, we also adopted Tailwind CSS. It is a CSS framework providing low-level utility classes that will act as building blocks when we create custom designs.
Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.
Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.
Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.
https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085
Pros of .NET
- Tight integration with visual studio272
- Stable code261
- Great community190
- Reliable and strongly typed server side language.182
- Microsoft140
- Fantastic documentation119
- Great 3rd party libraries89
- Speedy80
- Great azure integration71
- Great support63
- Highly productive34
- Linq34
- C#34
- High Performance31
- Great programming languages (C#, VB)28
- Open source26
- Powerful Web application framework (ASP.NET MVC)19
- Fast16
- Clean markup with razor16
- Powerful ORM (EntityFramework)15
- Dependency injection14
- Visual studio + Resharper = <310
- Constantly improving to keep up with new trends10
- High-Performance9
- TFS8
- Security8
- Job opportunities7
- Integrated and Reliable7
- Huge ecosystem and communities7
- Light-weight6
- Lovely6
- {get; set;}5
- Variations5
- Asynchrony5
- Scaffolding4
- Support and SImplicity4
- Default Debuging tools4
- Concurrent4
- Useful IoC4
- Entity framework4
- Nuget package manager3
- Blazor3
- F♯2
Pros of Material-UI
- React141
- Material Design82
- Ui components60
- CSS framework30
- Component26
- Looks great15
- Responsive13
- Good documentation12
- LESS9
- Ui component8
- Open source7
- Flexible6
- Code examples6
- JSS5
- Supports old browsers out of the box3
- Interface3
- Angular3
- Very accessible3
- Fun3
- Typescript support2
- # of components2
- Designed for Server Side Rendering2
- Support for multiple styling systems1
- Accessibility1
- Easy to work with1
- Css1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of .NET
- C#13
- Too expensive to deploy and maintain12
- Microsoft dependable systems8
- Microsoft itself8
- Hard learning curve5
- Tight integration with visual studio3
- Not have a full fledged visual studio for linux3
- Microsoft itself 🤡🥲1
Cons of Material-UI
- Hard to learn. Bad documentation36
- Hard to customize29
- Hard to understand Docs22
- Bad performance9
- Extra library needed for date/time pickers7
- For editable table component need to use material-table7
- Typescript Support2
- # of components1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is .NET?
What is Material-UI?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use .NET?
What companies use Material-UI?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with .NET?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+3
+12
+22