Docker vs TeamCity

Overview

Docker

Stacks194.2K

Followers143.8K

Votes3.9K

TeamCity

Stacks1.2K

Followers1.1K

Votes316

Docker vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

Introduction

Docker and TeamCity are both popular tools in the field of software development and deployment. While both tools serve different purposes, they have some key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail.

Containerization vs Continuous Integration: The fundamental difference between Docker and TeamCity lies in their main functionalities. Docker is primarily a containerization platform that allows developers to package and distribute applications along with their dependencies. On the other hand, TeamCity is a Continuous Integration (CI) server that enables teams to automate the process of building, testing, and deploying code changes.
Infrastructure vs Process: Another significant difference is the focus of the two tools. Docker primarily focuses on managing infrastructure by enabling the creation and management of containers. It allows developers to build and deploy applications consistently across different environments. In contrast, TeamCity focuses on managing the entire development process by automating tasks such as code building, testing, and deployment.
Stand-alone vs Collaborative: Docker can be used as a stand-alone tool, allowing developers to package and distribute applications independently. It provides an isolated environment for running applications, ensuring that they work consistently across different machines. TeamCity, on the other hand, is designed for collaboration within a development team. It facilitates communication and coordination among team members by providing integration with version control systems and project management tools.
Development vs Operations: Docker primarily targets developers, providing them with a consistent environment for building and running applications. It helps to eliminate the "it works on my machine" problem by ensuring that applications work consistently across different environments. In contrast, TeamCity targets operations teams by automating the build, test, and deployment process. It enables continuous integration and delivery, ensuring that code changes are thoroughly tested and deployed in a controlled manner.
Container Management vs Task Management: Docker focuses on container management, allowing developers to create, manage, and distribute containers. It provides features such as container orchestration and clustering for managing containerized applications in production. TeamCity, on the other hand, focuses on task management by providing a centralized platform for automating various tasks in the development process, including building, testing, and deploying code changes.

In Summary, while Docker focuses on containerization and infrastructure management, TeamCity is a CI server that focuses on automating the development process. Docker targets developers, providing consistent environments for building and running applications, while TeamCity targets operations teams, automating tasks such as code building, testing, and deployment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Docker, TeamCity

Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

483k views483k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Docker	TeamCity
The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere	TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.
Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion	Automate code analyzing, compiling, and testing processes, with having instant feedback on build progress, problems, and test failures, all in a simple, intuitive web-interface; Simplified setup: create projects from just a VCS repository URL;Run multiple builds and tests under different configurations and platforms simultaneously; Make sure your team sustains an uninterrupted workflow with the help of Pretested commits and Personal builds; Have build history insight with customizable statistics on build duration, success rate, code quality, and custom metrics; Enable cost-effective on-demand build infrastructure scaling thanks to tight integration with Amazon EC2; Easily extend TeamCity functionality and add new integrations using Java API; Great visual project representation. Track any changes made by any user in the system, filter projects and choose style of visual change status representation;
Statistics
Stacks 194.2K	Stacks 1.2K
Followers 143.8K	Followers 1.1K
Votes 3.9K	Votes 316
Pros & Cons
Pros 823 Rapid integration and build up 692 Isolation 521 Open source 505 Testability and reproducibility 460 Lightweight Cons 8 New versions == broken features 6 Unreliable networking 6 Documentation not always in sync 4 Moves quickly 3 Not Secure	Pros 61 Easy to configure 37 Reliable and high-quality 32 On premise 32 Github integration 32 User friendly Cons 3 High costs for more than three build agents 2 User-friendly 2 User friendly 2 Proprietary
Integrations
Java Docker Compose VirtualBox Linux Amazon EC2 Container Service Docker Swarm boot2docker Kubernetes Docker Machine Vagrant	Slack

What are some alternatives to Docker, TeamCity?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

Docker vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

Introduction

Containerization vs Continuous Integration: The fundamental difference between Docker and TeamCity lies in their main functionalities. Docker is primarily a containerization platform that allows developers to package and distribute applications along with their dependencies. On the other hand, TeamCity is a Continuous Integration (CI) server that enables teams to automate the process of building, testing, and deploying code changes.
Infrastructure vs Process: Another significant difference is the focus of the two tools. Docker primarily focuses on managing infrastructure by enabling the creation and management of containers. It allows developers to build and deploy applications consistently across different environments. In contrast, TeamCity focuses on managing the entire development process by automating tasks such as code building, testing, and deployment.
Stand-alone vs Collaborative: Docker can be used as a stand-alone tool, allowing developers to package and distribute applications independently. It provides an isolated environment for running applications, ensuring that they work consistently across different machines. TeamCity, on the other hand, is designed for collaboration within a development team. It facilitates communication and coordination among team members by providing integration with version control systems and project management tools.
Development vs Operations: Docker primarily targets developers, providing them with a consistent environment for building and running applications. It helps to eliminate the "it works on my machine" problem by ensuring that applications work consistently across different environments. In contrast, TeamCity targets operations teams by automating the build, test, and deployment process. It enables continuous integration and delivery, ensuring that code changes are thoroughly tested and deployed in a controlled manner.
Container Management vs Task Management: Docker focuses on container management, allowing developers to create, manage, and distribute containers. It provides features such as container orchestration and clustering for managing containerized applications in production. TeamCity, on the other hand, focuses on task management by providing a centralized platform for automating various tasks in the development process, including building, testing, and deploying code changes.

Docker vs TeamCity

Overview

Docker vs TeamCity: What are the differences?