Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Docker vs JBoss: What are the differences?
Introduction
Docker and JBoss are two widely used technologies in the field of software development and deployment. While both serve the purpose of application deployment, they have significant differences that set them apart. In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Docker and JBoss.
Isolation and Portability: Docker provides containerization, which allows applications to run in isolated environments. It ensures that the application and its dependencies are bundled together, making it highly portable across different platforms and operating systems. On the other hand, JBoss is an application server that provides a runtime environment for Java-based applications. It offers a comprehensive set of services and APIs for enterprise applications but does not provide the same level of isolation and portability as Docker.
Resource Utilization: Docker containers are lightweight and share the underlying host operating system's kernel. This allows for better resource utilization as multiple containers can run on the same host system without significant performance degradation. JBoss, being an application server, requires dedicated resources for each running instance, which can result in higher resource consumption and lower scalability compared to Docker.
Deployment Flexibility: Docker allows for easy and flexible deployment of applications by packaging them into containers. These containers can be deployed on any Docker-enabled host, making it suitable for both local and cloud-based deployments. On the other hand, JBoss relies on traditional deployment methods, such as deploying applications in a WAR (Web Application Archive) format, which may require additional configuration and setup.
Service Orchestration: Docker provides built-in support for service orchestration through tools like Docker Swarm and Kubernetes. It allows for managing and scaling containerized applications across multiple hosts, ensuring high availability and fault tolerance. JBoss, being an application server, can be deployed in a clustered environment but may require additional configuration and setup to achieve similar levels of service orchestration as offered by Docker.
Containerization vs. Full Application Server: Docker provides lightweight containerization, where each container runs a single application or service. This enables modular and scalable deployment of applications. JBoss, on the other hand, is a full-fledged application server that provides a complete runtime environment for Java-based applications. It includes services like messaging, caching, and clustering, making it suitable for complex enterprise applications.
Community and Ecosystem: Docker has a large and vibrant community, with extensive documentation, resources, and support. It has a vast ecosystem of tools, frameworks, and libraries built around it, making it easy to integrate with existing workflows and tools. JBoss, being a popular and widely adopted application server, also has a strong community and ecosystem but may not be as diverse and extensive as Docker.
In summary, Docker provides lightweight containerization with high portability, resource efficiency, and flexible deployment options, while JBoss is a comprehensive application server offering a wide range of services but with less isolation, portability, and deployment flexibility compared to Docker.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Fast and Portable6
- Easy setup6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- It's dope3
- Highly useful3
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Asdfd0
Pros of JBoss
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3