Docker vs Eucalyptus

Overview

Docker

Stacks194.2K

Followers143.8K

Votes3.9K

Eucalyptus

Stacks18

Followers86

Votes0

Docker vs Eucalyptus: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of cloud computing, Docker and Eucalyptus are both popular choices for managing applications and infrastructure. However, they have distinct differences that set them apart in terms of functionality and usability.

Orchestration Capabilities: Docker mainly focuses on containerization and application deployment, while Eucalyptus offers a robust orchestration framework for managing virtual machines and underlying infrastructure. Eucalyptus provides more advanced features for workload orchestration and scalability compared to Docker, making it a suitable choice for larger, complex cloud environments.
Containerization Approach: Docker uses lightweight containers to package and run applications, providing a more efficient and faster deployment process. On the other hand, Eucalyptus utilizes virtual machine instances for application deployment, which can be heavier in terms of resource utilization compared to Docker containers. This difference in containerization approach impacts the performance and overhead of running applications in these environments.
Compatibility with Public Cloud Services: Docker is more widely adopted and integrates seamlessly with popular public cloud platforms like AWS and Google Cloud. In contrast, Eucalyptus is designed to mimic the AWS API, making it compatible with AWS services but may have limitations in terms of compatibility with other public cloud providers. This difference in compatibility can affect the ease of migration and interoperability between different cloud environments.
Scalability and Performance: Docker excels in scalability and performance for microservices-based architectures, with its container-based approach offering lightweight and fast application deployment. Eucalyptus, while capable of scaling to large cloud environments, may experience performance overhead due to the use of virtual machines for deployment. Understanding the scalability and performance requirements of your applications is essential in choosing between Docker and Eucalyptus for cloud deployments.
Community Support and Development: Docker has a large and active community that contributes to its continuous development and improvement, resulting in frequent updates and new features. Eucalyptus, while supported by a dedicated open-source community, may have a smaller user base and slower development pace compared to Docker. Consider the level of community support and future roadmap of these platforms when making a decision on which one to adopt for your cloud infrastructure.
Cost and Licensing Model: Docker follows a more flexible and permissive open-source licensing model, allowing users to leverage the platform without significant licensing costs. Eucalyptus, on the other hand, may have licensing fees associated with certain enterprise features and support, which can impact the total cost of ownership for deploying and managing cloud environments. Consider the cost implications of each platform based on your budget and requirements when evaluating Docker and Eucalyptus for your cloud deployments.

In Summary, Docker and Eucalyptus differ in their orchestration capabilities, containerization approach, compatibility with public cloud services, scalability and performance, community support and development, as well as cost and licensing model, making each platform suitable for specific use cases and environments in cloud computing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Docker, Eucalyptus

Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

483k views483k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Docker	Eucalyptus
The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere	Eucalyptus is open source software for building private, AWS-compatible IT, QA, and developer clouds. It makes it easy to deliver cloud computing, just like AWS, from within your data center.
Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion	Hybrid Cloud Management - Launch instances, create snapshots and manage autoscaling groups in either your private or public clouds from a single environment. Now the same powerful and easy to use self-service interface that provisions and manages Eucalyptus Cloud resources can manage your AWS cloud resources.;AWS Compatibility - Eucalyptus provides industry-leading compatibility with popular Amazon Web Services (AWS) APIs including EC2, S3, Elastic Block Store (EBS), Identity and Access Management (IAM), Auto Scaling, Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), and CloudWatch.;Compute - Eucalyptus allows you to use industry-standard servers, storage, networking, and virtualization technologies to deliver cost-effective, AWS-compatible cloud services in your datacenter. Eucalyptus is compatible with AWS’s EC2 and allows you to easily deploy compute resources and efficiently increase or decrease compute capacity based on application demands.;Networking - Eucalyptus offers flexible and scalable virtual networking capabilities compatible with AWS Elastic IPs, Security Groups, and Elastic Load Balancing.;Storage - Eucalyptus provides S3-compatible object storage and EBS-compatible block storage using industry-standard storage hardware to deliver against a variety of application performance, cost, and reliability requirements.;Self-service Provisioning - In addition to providing REST-based APIs for programmatic access, Eucalyptus includes an easy to use web-based console to provide self-service provisioning of cloud resources to users.;Cloud Management - Eucalyptus allows administrators to easily manage their cloud via REST-based APIs, command line interface (CLI), or from a web-based console.
Statistics
Stacks 194.2K	Stacks 18
Followers 143.8K	Followers 86
Votes 3.9K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 823 Rapid integration and build up 692 Isolation 521 Open source 505 Testability and reproducibility 460 Lightweight Cons 8 New versions == broken features 6 Documentation not always in sync 6 Unreliable networking 4 Moves quickly 3 Not Secure	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Java Docker Compose VirtualBox Linux Amazon EC2 Container Service Docker Swarm boot2docker Kubernetes Docker Machine Vagrant	Amazon S3 Amazon Route 53 AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) Amazon DynamoDB Amazon VPC Amazon EC2 Amazon ElastiCache Amazon EBS AWS CloudTrail Amazon SNS

What are some alternatives to Docker, Eucalyptus?

OpenStack

OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.

Apache CloudStack

CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

LXC

LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.

rkt

Rocket is a cli for running App Containers. The goal of rocket is to be composable, secure, and fast.

VirtKick

Software as a service platform for hosting providers.

Vagrant Cloud

Vagrant Cloud pairs with Vagrant to enable access, insight and collaboration across teams, as well as to bring exposure to community contributions and development environments.

Studio 3T

It's the only MongoDB tool that provides three ways to explore data alongside powerful features like query autocompletion, polyglot code generation, a stage-by-stage aggregation query builder, import and export, SQL query support and more.

OpenNebula

It provides a simple but feature-rich and flexible solution for the comprehensive management of virtualized data centers to enable on-premise enterprise clouds in existing infrastructures. It can be primarily used as a virtualization tool to manage your virtual infrastructure in the data-center or cluster, which is usually referred as Private Cloud. It supports Hybrid Cloud to combine local infrastructure with public cloud-based infrastructure, enabling highly scalable hosting environments.

OpenVZ

Virtuozzo leverages OpenVZ as its core of a virtualization solution offered by Virtuozzo company. Virtuozzo is optimized for hosters and offers hypervisor (VMs in addition to containers), distributed cloud storage, dedicated support, management tools, and easy installation.

Related Comparisons

Docker vs Eucalyptus: What are the differences?

Orchestration Capabilities: Docker mainly focuses on containerization and application deployment, while Eucalyptus offers a robust orchestration framework for managing virtual machines and underlying infrastructure. Eucalyptus provides more advanced features for workload orchestration and scalability compared to Docker, making it a suitable choice for larger, complex cloud environments.
Containerization Approach: Docker uses lightweight containers to package and run applications, providing a more efficient and faster deployment process. On the other hand, Eucalyptus utilizes virtual machine instances for application deployment, which can be heavier in terms of resource utilization compared to Docker containers. This difference in containerization approach impacts the performance and overhead of running applications in these environments.
Compatibility with Public Cloud Services: Docker is more widely adopted and integrates seamlessly with popular public cloud platforms like AWS and Google Cloud. In contrast, Eucalyptus is designed to mimic the AWS API, making it compatible with AWS services but may have limitations in terms of compatibility with other public cloud providers. This difference in compatibility can affect the ease of migration and interoperability between different cloud environments.
Scalability and Performance: Docker excels in scalability and performance for microservices-based architectures, with its container-based approach offering lightweight and fast application deployment. Eucalyptus, while capable of scaling to large cloud environments, may experience performance overhead due to the use of virtual machines for deployment. Understanding the scalability and performance requirements of your applications is essential in choosing between Docker and Eucalyptus for cloud deployments.
Community Support and Development: Docker has a large and active community that contributes to its continuous development and improvement, resulting in frequent updates and new features. Eucalyptus, while supported by a dedicated open-source community, may have a smaller user base and slower development pace compared to Docker. Consider the level of community support and future roadmap of these platforms when making a decision on which one to adopt for your cloud infrastructure.
Cost and Licensing Model: Docker follows a more flexible and permissive open-source licensing model, allowing users to leverage the platform without significant licensing costs. Eucalyptus, on the other hand, may have licensing fees associated with certain enterprise features and support, which can impact the total cost of ownership for deploying and managing cloud environments. Consider the cost implications of each platform based on your budget and requirements when evaluating Docker and Eucalyptus for your cloud deployments.

Docker vs Eucalyptus

Overview