StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Docker Compose vs Jenkins

Docker Compose vs Jenkins

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Stacks22.3K
Followers16.5K
Votes501
GitHub Stars36.4K
Forks5.5K

Docker Compose vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Comparison: Docker Compose vs Jenkins

Docker Compose and Jenkins are two widely used tools in the field of software development and deployment. They serve different purposes and have distinct features that make them valuable for different aspects of the software development process. In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between Docker Compose and Jenkins.

  1. Architecture and Purpose: Docker Compose is a tool used for defining and running multi-container Docker applications. It allows developers to define their application's services, networks, and volumes in a YAML file, making it easy to spin up and manage multiple containers as a single entity. On the other hand, Jenkins is an open-source automation server used for automating various aspects of the software development lifecycle, such as building, testing, and deploying applications.

  2. Container Orchestration: Docker Compose focuses on providing a simplified way to manage and coordinate multiple Docker containers on a single host. It streamlines the process of container orchestration within a development environment. In contrast, Jenkins is more oriented towards continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines, acting as the orchestrator for a series of tasks and stages involved in the software delivery process.

  3. Ease of Use: Docker Compose is known for its simplicity and ease of use. With its declarative YAML syntax, developers can easily define and manage their multi-container applications. It provides a straightforward way to start and stop containers, manage their dependencies, and configure the networking between them. Jenkins, on the other hand, offers a wide range of features and capabilities, which can make it more complex and challenging to set up and configure initially.

  4. Extensibility and Plugin Ecosystem: Jenkins has a vast ecosystem of plugins that can be used to extend its functionality. These plugins cover various aspects of development, testing, and deployment, allowing users to customize and enhance their Jenkins setup according to their specific needs. Docker Compose, on the other hand, offers a limited set of built-in features and does not have as extensive a plugin ecosystem as Jenkins.

  5. Focus on Orchestrating Infrastructure: While Docker Compose focuses on orchestrating Docker containers within a single host or development environment, Jenkins is designed to orchestrate various stages and tasks involved in the software delivery process. Jenkins can be integrated with various tools and services to facilitate build automation, testing, and deployment on different infrastructure environments, including cloud platforms.

  6. Community and Support: Jenkins has a large and active community, with a wealth of documentation, tutorials, and forums available for users to seek help and share their experiences. The community-driven nature of Jenkins ensures regular updates, bug fixes, and the development of new features. Docker Compose also has a supportive community, but it may not be as extensive or active as the Jenkins community.

In summary, Docker Compose is primarily focused on managing and orchestrating Docker containers within a development environment, while Jenkins is an automation server that helps automate various stages of the software delivery process. Docker Compose offers ease of use and simplicity, while Jenkins provides a robust platform with extensibility and a plugin ecosystem. Both tools have their strengths and are valuable in different contexts of software development and deployment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Docker Compose

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
Docker Compose
Docker Compose

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
36.4K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
5.5K
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
22.3K
Followers
50.4K
Followers
16.5K
Votes
2.2K
Votes
501
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
  • 7
    Lack of support
Pros
  • 123
    Multi-container descriptor
  • 110
    Fast development environment setup
  • 79
    Easy linking of containers
  • 68
    Simple yaml configuration
  • 60
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 9
    Tied to single machine
  • 5
    Still very volatile, changing syntax often
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Docker Compose?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana