Docker Cloud vs Tutum

Overview

Tutum

Stacks61

Followers74

Votes235

Docker Cloud

Stacks78

Followers127

Votes11

Docker Cloud vs Tutum: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Pricing Model: Docker Cloud offered a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users were charged based on the resources consumed, whereas Tutum had a flat-rate pricing structure, which allowed users to have a predictable cost.
Support and Community: Docker Cloud had extensive community support due to its popularity and backing by Docker Inc., providing users with a wide range of resources, forums, and tutorials. On the other hand, Tutum had a smaller community since it was a newer platform, leading to limited support options.
Scalability: Docker Cloud was more focused on catering to larger, enterprise-level organizations, offering advanced scaling capabilities and enterprise-grade features. Tutum, on the other hand, targeted smaller to medium-sized businesses, providing more straightforward scaling options that were user-friendly.
Integration with Docker Hub: Docker Cloud had seamless integration with Docker Hub, allowing users to easily push and pull images, manage repositories, and utilize the Docker ecosystem. Tutum also had integration capabilities but was not as closely tied to Docker Hub, which could lead to limitations in image management and deployment.
User Interface: Docker Cloud had a more robust and user-friendly interface, with advanced features for experienced users, such as detailed monitoring and reporting tools. On the contrary, Tutum had a simpler interface, which was more intuitive for beginners but lacked some of the advanced functionalities present in Docker Cloud.
Future Development: Docker Cloud was part of Docker's long-term strategy, with continuous updates and improvements to align with industry trends and user feedback. Tutum, however, was eventually transitioned into Docker Cloud, leading to a shift in focus and resources towards enhancing Docker Cloud's capabilities.

In Summary, Docker Cloud and Tutum differed in terms of pricing models, support, scalability, integration with Docker Hub, user interface, and future development strategies.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Tutum	Docker Cloud
Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.	Docker Cloud is the best way to deploy and manage Dockerized applications. Docker Cloud makes it easy for new Docker users to manage and deploy the full spectrum of applications, from single container apps to distributed microservices stacks, to any cloud or on-premises infrastructure.
Deploy from Docker Hub; Free private Docker registry; CLI Tool; Private Links; Dynamic Links; RESTful API; Edit & Redeploy; Jumpstarts & Quickstarts; Webhooks; Bring your own node; Data volumes; Amazon Web Services; Digital Ocean; Microsoft Azure;	Simplify Docker Provisioning;Deploy Apps Anywhere;Automate Your Developer Workflows;Manage Apps Anywhere
Statistics
Stacks 61	Stacks 78
Followers 74	Followers 127
Votes 235	Votes 11
Pros & Cons
Pros 35 Awesome user interface 28 Free private docker registry 24 Its super easy 24 Docker public index integration 21 Friendly support	Pros 9 Easy to use 2 Seamless transition from docker compose
Integrations
Docker MongoDB MariaDB MySQL DigitalOcean Memcached RabbitMQ PostgreSQL Riak WordPress	Docker

What are some alternatives to Tutum, Docker Cloud?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Amazon EC2 Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service lets you launch and stop container-enabled applications with simple API calls, allows you to query the state of your cluster from a centralized service, and gives you access to many familiar Amazon EC2 features like security groups, EBS volumes and IAM roles.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Google Kubernetes Engine

Container Engine takes care of provisioning and maintaining the underlying virtual machine cluster, scaling your application, and operational logistics like logging, monitoring, and health management.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

Containerum

Containerum is built to aid cluster management, teamwork and resource allocation. Containerum runs on top of any Kubernetes cluster and provides a friendly Web UI for cluster management.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

Related Comparisons

Docker Cloud vs Tutum: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Pricing Model: Docker Cloud offered a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users were charged based on the resources consumed, whereas Tutum had a flat-rate pricing structure, which allowed users to have a predictable cost.
Support and Community: Docker Cloud had extensive community support due to its popularity and backing by Docker Inc., providing users with a wide range of resources, forums, and tutorials. On the other hand, Tutum had a smaller community since it was a newer platform, leading to limited support options.
Scalability: Docker Cloud was more focused on catering to larger, enterprise-level organizations, offering advanced scaling capabilities and enterprise-grade features. Tutum, on the other hand, targeted smaller to medium-sized businesses, providing more straightforward scaling options that were user-friendly.
Integration with Docker Hub: Docker Cloud had seamless integration with Docker Hub, allowing users to easily push and pull images, manage repositories, and utilize the Docker ecosystem. Tutum also had integration capabilities but was not as closely tied to Docker Hub, which could lead to limitations in image management and deployment.
User Interface: Docker Cloud had a more robust and user-friendly interface, with advanced features for experienced users, such as detailed monitoring and reporting tools. On the contrary, Tutum had a simpler interface, which was more intuitive for beginners but lacked some of the advanced functionalities present in Docker Cloud.
Future Development: Docker Cloud was part of Docker's long-term strategy, with continuous updates and improvements to align with industry trends and user feedback. Tutum, however, was eventually transitioned into Docker Cloud, leading to a shift in focus and resources towards enhancing Docker Cloud's capabilities.

In Summary, Docker Cloud and Tutum differed in terms of pricing models, support, scalability, integration with Docker Hub, user interface, and future development strategies.

Docker Cloud vs Tutum

Overview