StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Service Discovery
  5. Docker Cloud vs Eureka

Docker Cloud vs Eureka

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Eureka
Eureka
Stacks291
Followers779
Votes70
GitHub Stars12.7K
Forks3.8K
Docker Cloud
Docker Cloud
Stacks78
Followers127
Votes11

Docker Cloud vs Eureka: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Docker Cloud and Eureka

Docker Cloud and Eureka are both tools used for managing and orchestrating containers, but they have several key differences.

  1. Infrastructure: Docker Cloud is a cloud-based solution that allows users to host and manage Docker containers across multiple cloud providers. It provides a user-friendly interface and simplifies the deployment process. On the other hand, Eureka is a service registry created by Netflix for managing and discovering microservices in a dynamic and distributed environment. It is primarily used for service discovery within a single data center or cloud provider.

  2. Architecture: Docker Cloud uses a centralized architecture, where the management of containers and infrastructure is handled by a single control plane. This makes it easier to manage multiple container deployments and provides centralized control over the entire infrastructure. In contrast, Eureka is based on a decentralized architecture. It uses a peer-to-peer model where each instance of a service registers itself with the Eureka server. This allows for greater scalability and fault tolerance as there is no single point of failure.

  3. Integration: Docker Cloud integrates well with other Docker tools and services, such as Docker Compose and Docker Swarm. This allows for easy management and orchestration of containers in a Docker environment. It also provides integration with cloud providers like AWS and Azure, making it easier to deploy containers on these platforms. On the other hand, Eureka integrates well with Spring Cloud, a framework for building distributed systems with Java. Eureka provides native support for Spring applications and can be easily integrated into a microservices architecture built on the Spring ecosystem.

  4. Scaling: Docker Cloud provides built-in support for scaling applications horizontally by allowing users to define auto-scaling rules and policies. It also supports scaling individual containers within a service. This makes it convenient for handling fluctuating workloads and managing resources efficiently. In contrast, Eureka does not provide built-in scalability features. It is primarily focused on service discovery and does not have native support for auto-scaling or resizing individual instances of services.

  5. Community and Support: Docker Cloud has a large and active community of users and developers. It is backed by Docker Inc., the company behind Docker, and has official support channels and documentation. This ensures timely updates, bug fixes, and a wealth of resources for users. On the other hand, Eureka is an open-source project developed by Netflix. It also has a significant user base and a supportive community. However, being an open-source project, it may have a more limited set of features and support options compared to Docker Cloud.

In Summary, Docker Cloud is a cloud-based solution for managing and orchestrating Docker containers across multiple cloud providers, while Eureka is a service registry designed for managing microservices within a single data center or cloud provider. Docker Cloud has a centralized architecture, integrates well with Docker tools and cloud providers, provides built-in scaling features, and has a large community and official support. On the other hand, Eureka has a decentralized architecture, integrates well with Spring applications, does not have built-in scaling features, and is backed by a supportive open-source community.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Eureka
Eureka
Docker Cloud
Docker Cloud

Eureka is a REST (Representational State Transfer) based service that is primarily used in the AWS cloud for locating services for the purpose of load balancing and failover of middle-tier servers.

Docker Cloud is the best way to deploy and manage Dockerized applications. Docker Cloud makes it easy for new Docker users to manage and deploy the full spectrum of applications, from single container apps to distributed microservices stacks, to any cloud or on-premises infrastructure.

-
Simplify Docker Provisioning;Deploy Apps Anywhere;Automate Your Developer Workflows;Manage Apps Anywhere
Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
291
Stacks
78
Followers
779
Followers
127
Votes
70
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 21
    Easy setup and integration with spring-cloud
  • 9
    Web ui
  • 8
    Health checking
  • 8
    Monitoring
  • 7
    Circuit breaker
Cons
  • 1
    Nada
Pros
  • 9
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Seamless transition from docker compose
Integrations
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Eureka, Docker Cloud?

Amazon EC2 Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service lets you launch and stop container-enabled applications with simple API calls, allows you to query the state of your cluster from a centralized service, and gives you access to many familiar Amazon EC2 features like security groups, EBS volumes and IAM roles.

Consul

Consul

Consul is a tool for service discovery and configuration. Consul is distributed, highly available, and extremely scalable.

Google Kubernetes Engine

Google Kubernetes Engine

Container Engine takes care of provisioning and maintaining the underlying virtual machine cluster, scaling your application, and operational logistics like logging, monitoring, and health management.

Zookeeper

Zookeeper

A centralized service for maintaining configuration information, naming, providing distributed synchronization, and providing group services. All of these kinds of services are used in some form or another by distributed applications.

Containerum

Containerum

Containerum is built to aid cluster management, teamwork and resource allocation. Containerum runs on top of any Kubernetes cluster and provides a friendly Web UI for cluster management.

etcd

etcd

etcd is a distributed key value store that provides a reliable way to store data across a cluster of machines. It’s open-source and available on GitHub. etcd gracefully handles master elections during network partitions and will tolerate machine failure, including the master.

Azure Container Service

Azure Container Service

Azure Container Service optimizes the configuration of popular open source tools and technologies specifically for Azure. You get an open solution that offers portability for both your containers and your application configuration. You select the size, the number of hosts, and choice of orchestrator tools, and Container Service handles everything else.

Keepalived

Keepalived

The main goal of this project is to provide simple and robust facilities for loadbalancing and high-availability to Linux system and Linux based infrastructures.

Amazon EKS

Amazon EKS

Amazon Elastic Container Service for Kubernetes (Amazon EKS) is a managed service that makes it easy for you to run Kubernetes on AWS without needing to install and operate your own Kubernetes clusters.

SkyDNS

SkyDNS

SkyDNS is a distributed service for announcement and discovery of services. It leverages Raft for high-availability and consensus, and utilizes DNS queries to discover available services. This is done by leveraging SRV records in DNS, with special meaning given to subdomains, priorities and weights (more info here: http://blog.gopheracademy.com/skydns).

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana