StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Orm
  5. Dapper vs Entity Framework

Dapper vs Entity Framework

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Entity Framework
Entity Framework
Stacks2.1K
Followers240
Votes19
Dapper
Dapper
Stacks574
Followers85
Votes6

Dapper vs Entity Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Dapper and Entity Framework in the context of database access in .NET applications.

  1. Database Interaction Style: Dapper is a micro-ORM (Object-Relational Mapper) that provides a thin layer of abstraction over ADO.NET, whereas Entity Framework is a full-fledged ORM that offers a higher level of abstraction for database interaction.

  2. Performance: Dapper is known for its exceptional performance due to its lightweight nature and direct mapping of SQL queries to objects. On the other hand, Entity Framework provides a broader feature set but may have a slightly higher performance overhead compared to Dapper.

  3. Mappings and Code Generation: Dapper relies heavily on manual mapping of SQL results to object properties, whereas Entity Framework leverages automated mapping techniques and code generation. This results in increased productivity and reduced development time with Entity Framework, but sacrifices some control and flexibility compared to Dapper.

  4. Flexibility: Dapper is highly flexible and allows developers to write custom SQL queries and utilize advanced database features effectively. Whereas, Entity Framework favors convention over configuration and promotes standardizing the database schema to work seamlessly with its features. This offers ease of use at the cost of certain flexibility.

  5. Complexity and Learning Curve: Dapper is relatively simple to understand and use, making it an attractive choice for smaller projects or when direct control over SQL queries is desired. In contrast, Entity Framework is a more complex framework with a steeper learning curve. It requires understanding of various concepts such as migrations, DbContext, and LINQ to efficiently work with it.

  6. Design and Development Approach: Due to its lightweight nature, Dapper is often preferred when following a domain-driven design approach or when working with legacy databases. Entity Framework, on the other hand, is well-suited for larger enterprise applications with complex domain models that can benefit from the framework's full-stack solution.

In summary, Dapper is a lightweight micro-ORM offering excellent performance and control over SQL queries, while Entity Framework provides a more comprehensive ORM solution with advanced features, improved productivity, and a broader range of functionalities. The choice between them depends on the specific project requirements, performance considerations, and the level of control and flexibility desired by the developer.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Entity Framework
Entity Framework
Dapper
Dapper

It is an object-relational mapper that enables .NET developers to work with relational data using domain-specific objects. It eliminates the need for most of the data-access code that developers usually need to write.

It is an object-relational mapping product for the Microsoft.NET platform: it provides a framework for mapping an object-oriented domain model to a traditional relational database.

ORM, Work with relational data using domain-specific objects;Eliminates the need for most of the data-access code
Parameterized queries; List Support; Literal replacements; Multi Mapping
Statistics
Stacks
2.1K
Stacks
574
Followers
240
Followers
85
Votes
19
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    LINQ
  • 3
    Object Oriented
  • 3
    Strongly Object-Oriented
  • 2
    Multiple approach (Model/Database/Code) first
  • 2
    Code first approach
Pros
  • 6
    Fastest ORM
Integrations
Firebird
Firebird
.NET
.NET
Oracle
Oracle
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
SQLite
SQLite
MySQL
MySQL
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
IBM DB2
IBM DB2
MySQL
MySQL
SQLite
SQLite
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
.NET
.NET
Oracle
Oracle
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Firebird
Firebird

What are some alternatives to Entity Framework, Dapper?

Sequelize

Sequelize

Sequelize is a promise-based ORM for Node.js and io.js. It supports the dialects PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQLite and MSSQL and features solid transaction support, relations, read replication and more.

Prisma

Prisma

Prisma is an open-source database toolkit. It replaces traditional ORMs and makes database access easy with an auto-generated query builder for TypeScript & Node.js.

Hibernate

Hibernate

Hibernate is a suite of open source projects around domain models. The flagship project is Hibernate ORM, the Object Relational Mapper.

Doctrine 2

Doctrine 2

Doctrine 2 sits on top of a powerful database abstraction layer (DBAL). One of its key features is the option to write database queries in a proprietary object oriented SQL dialect called Doctrine Query Language (DQL), inspired by Hibernates HQL.

MikroORM

MikroORM

TypeScript ORM for Node.js based on Data Mapper, Unit of Work and Identity Map patterns. Supports MongoDB, MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL and SQLite databases.

peewee

peewee

A small, expressive orm, written in python (2.6+, 3.2+), with built-in support for sqlite, mysql and postgresql and special extensions like hstore.

MyBatis

MyBatis

It is a first class persistence framework with support for custom SQL, stored procedures and advanced mappings. It eliminates almost all of the JDBC code and manual setting of parameters and retrieval of results. It can use simple XML or Annotations for configuration and map primitives, Map interfaces and Java POJOs (Plain Old Java Objects) to database records.

Entity Framework Core

Entity Framework Core

It is a lightweight, extensible, open source and cross-platform version of the popular Entity Framework data access technology. It can serve as an object-relational mapper (O/RM), enabling .NET developers to work with a database using .NET objects, and eliminating the need for most of the data-access code they usually need to write.

SQLAlchemy

SQLAlchemy

SQLAlchemy is the Python SQL toolkit and Object Relational Mapper that gives application developers the full power and flexibility of SQL.

NHibernate

NHibernate

It is a mature, open source object-relational mapper for the .NET framework. It's actively developed, fully featured and used in thousands of successful projects.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase