CyberArk vs Vault

Overview

Vault

Stacks816

Followers802

Votes71

GitHub Stars33.4K

Forks4.5K

CyberArk

Stacks44

Followers72

Votes0

CyberArk vs Vault: What are the differences?

Introduction

This markdown code provides a comparison between CyberArk and Vault, outlining the key differences between these two security solutions.

Architecture: CyberArk follows a client-server architecture, where a central server manages the privileged accounts and access to them. In contrast, Vault operates using a server-cluster architecture, distributing secrets across several nodes and employing a decentralized approach to management.
Secrets Management: While both CyberArk and Vault offer secrets management capabilities, they differ in their approaches. CyberArk primarily focuses on managing privileged account credentials and offers comprehensive privileged access and session management features. Vault, on the other hand, is a broader secrets management tool, which includes features like dynamic secrets generation, secure key-value stores, and encryption-as-a-service.
Open Source vs. Proprietary: Vault is an open-source solution developed by HashiCorp, while CyberArk is a proprietary commercial product. The open-source nature of Vault allows for a more transparent and community-driven development process, making it attractive to organizations that prefer open-source technology.
Scalability and Performance: CyberArk is known for its scalability and robust performance, particularly when it comes to large-scale enterprise deployments. Vault, on the other hand, offers excellent scalability and performance, thanks to its distributed architecture and ability to handle high throughput.
Integration and Ecosystem: CyberArk has established itself as a market leader in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) space and provides a wide range of integrations with various systems, including popular third-party security solutions. Vault, being an open-source tool, benefits from a vibrant ecosystem of plugins and integrations, allowing it to integrate with an extensive array of tools and platforms.
Ease of Use: CyberArk offers a user-friendly interface and a comprehensive set of management tools, making it relatively straightforward to operate. Vault, while equally powerful, may require a higher level of technical expertise and familiarity with command-line interfaces due to its open-source nature.

In summary, CyberArk and Vault differ in their architecture, focus on secrets management, license type, scalability, integrations, and ease of use. CyberArk is widely recognized for its enterprise-grade privileged access management capabilities, while Vault's open-source nature and broader feature set make it appealing to organizations seeking a flexible and customizable secrets management solution.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vault	CyberArk
Vault is a tool for securely accessing secrets. A secret is anything that you want to tightly control access to, such as API keys, passwords, certificates, and more. Vault provides a unified interface to any secret, while providing tight access control and recording a detailed audit log.	It is the only security software company focused on eliminating cyber threats using insider privileges to attack the heart of the enterprise.
Secure Secret Storage: Arbitrary key/value secrets can be stored in Vault. Vault encrypts these secrets prior to writing them to persistent storage, so gaining access to the raw storage isn't enough to access your secrets. Vault can write to disk, Consul, and more.;Dynamic Secrets: Vault can generate secrets on-demand for some systems, such as AWS or SQL databases. For example, when an application needs to access an S3 bucket, it asks Vault for credentials, and Vault will generate an AWS keypair with valid permissions on demand. After creating these dynamic secrets, Vault will also automatically revoke them after the lease is up.;Data Encryption: Vault can encrypt and decrypt data without storing it. This allows security teams to define encryption parameters and developers to store encrypted data in a location such as SQL without having to design their own encryption methods.;Leasing and Renewal: All secrets in Vault have a lease associated with it. At the end of the lease, Vault will automatically revoke that secret. Clients are able to renew leases via built-in renew APIs.;Revocation: Vault has built-in support for secret revocation. Vault can revoke not only single secrets, but a tree of secrets, for example all secrets read by a specific user, or all secrets of a particular type. Revocation assists in key rolling as well as locking down systems in the case of an intrusion.	Email attachment protection; Credential protection and management; Session isolation and monitoring; Threat detection and analytics; End-to-end server protection; Domain controller protection; Activity monitoring; In-progress Kerberos attack detection
Statistics
GitHub Stars 33.4K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 4.5K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 816	Stacks 44
Followers 802	Followers 72
Votes 71	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 17 Secure 13 Variety of Secret Backends 11 Very easy to set up and use 8 Dynamic secret generation 5 AuditLog	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Bugsnag PagerDuty Sentry Rafay Systems Mingle

What are some alternatives to Vault, CyberArk?

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Doppler

Doppler’s developer-first security platform empowers teams to seamlessly manage, orchestrate, and govern secrets at scale.

IBM SKLM

It centralizes, simplifies and automates the encryption key management process to help minimize risk and reduce operational costs of encryption key management. It offers secure, robust key storage, key serving and key lifecycle management for IBM and non-IBM storage solutions using the OASIS Key Management Interoperability Protocol (KMIP).

Docker Secrets

A container native solution that strengthens the Trusted Delivery component of container security by integrating secret distribution directly into the container platform.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

Related Comparisons

CyberArk vs Vault: What are the differences?

Introduction

This markdown code provides a comparison between CyberArk and Vault, outlining the key differences between these two security solutions.

Architecture: CyberArk follows a client-server architecture, where a central server manages the privileged accounts and access to them. In contrast, Vault operates using a server-cluster architecture, distributing secrets across several nodes and employing a decentralized approach to management.
Secrets Management: While both CyberArk and Vault offer secrets management capabilities, they differ in their approaches. CyberArk primarily focuses on managing privileged account credentials and offers comprehensive privileged access and session management features. Vault, on the other hand, is a broader secrets management tool, which includes features like dynamic secrets generation, secure key-value stores, and encryption-as-a-service.
Open Source vs. Proprietary: Vault is an open-source solution developed by HashiCorp, while CyberArk is a proprietary commercial product. The open-source nature of Vault allows for a more transparent and community-driven development process, making it attractive to organizations that prefer open-source technology.
Scalability and Performance: CyberArk is known for its scalability and robust performance, particularly when it comes to large-scale enterprise deployments. Vault, on the other hand, offers excellent scalability and performance, thanks to its distributed architecture and ability to handle high throughput.
Integration and Ecosystem: CyberArk has established itself as a market leader in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) space and provides a wide range of integrations with various systems, including popular third-party security solutions. Vault, being an open-source tool, benefits from a vibrant ecosystem of plugins and integrations, allowing it to integrate with an extensive array of tools and platforms.
Ease of Use: CyberArk offers a user-friendly interface and a comprehensive set of management tools, making it relatively straightforward to operate. Vault, while equally powerful, may require a higher level of technical expertise and familiarity with command-line interfaces due to its open-source nature.

CyberArk vs Vault

Overview