StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. AI
  3. Development & Training Tools
  4. Machine Learning Tools
  5. CuPy vs Numba

CuPy vs Numba

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Numba
Numba
Stacks20
Followers44
Votes0
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
CuPy
CuPy
Stacks8
Followers27
Votes0
GitHub Stars10.6K
Forks967

CuPy vs Numba: What are the differences?

Key Differences between CuPy and Numba

CuPy and Numba are both libraries used for accelerating computation on GPUs. However, there are several key differences between the two:

  1. Usage and Language Support: CuPy is designed to be a GPU-accelerated library for NumPy-compatible arrays and functions. It provides a NumPy-like interface and supports a wide range of NumPy operations. On the other hand, Numba is a just-in-time (JIT) compiler that allows you to accelerate Python functions for CPU and GPU using just-in-time compilation. It can be used with any Python code and supports a subset of the Python language.

  2. Memory Management: CuPy uses its own memory allocator and memory management system, which allows for efficient memory allocation and deallocation on the GPU. It provides tools for allocating and managing memory on the GPU, such as device memory pools. In contrast, Numba relies on the CUDA memory management system and uses CUDA memory allocation functions for managing memory on the GPU.

  3. Support for GPU Programming Models: While both CuPy and Numba support CUDA programming models, CuPy also provides support for OpenCL, which allows for greater flexibility in terms of hardware support. Numba, on the other hand, primarily focuses on supporting the CUDA programming model and does not support OpenCL.

  4. Optimizations: CuPy focuses on optimizing array operations and provides a wide range of optimized functions for element-wise operations, reductions, linear algebra operations, and more. It also provides support for custom CUDA kernels. Numba, on the other hand, focuses on optimizing Python functions and provides just-in-time compilation for accelerating Python code. It can automatically parallelize and optimize loops, vectorize computations, and generate highly optimized machine code.

  5. Compilation Process: CuPy relies on the NVCC compiler to compile CUDA code, which can be time-consuming and may require additional dependencies. Numba, on the other hand, uses its own JIT compilation process, which automatically translates Python functions into optimized machine code during runtime. This eliminates the need for a separate compilation step and makes it easier to use and deploy.

  6. Community and Support: CuPy is primarily supported by the Preferred Networks, Inc. and has an active community of developers contributing to its development and maintenance. It is widely used in the deep learning community and has good documentation and support. Numba, on the other hand, is an open-source project supported by the Anaconda organization and has a dedicated team of developers working on its development and maintenance. It also has an active community and good documentation and support.

In summary, CuPy is a GPU-accelerated library designed for NumPy-compatible arrays and functions, while Numba is a just-in-time compiler that allows for accelerating Python functions for CPU and GPU. CuPy provides a NumPy-like interface, supports OpenCL, and focuses on optimizing array operations, while Numba supports a subset of Python language, primarily focuses on optimizing Python functions, and provides automatic JIT compilation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Numba
Numba
CuPy
CuPy

It translates Python functions to optimized machine code at runtime using the industry-standard LLVM compiler library. It offers a range of options for parallelising Python code for CPUs and GPUs, often with only minor code changes.

It is an open-source matrix library accelerated with NVIDIA CUDA. CuPy provides GPU accelerated computing with Python. It uses CUDA-related libraries including cuBLAS, cuDNN, cuRand, cuSolver, cuSPARSE, cuFFT and NCCL to make full use of the GPU architecture.

On-the-fly code generation; Native code generation for the CPU (default) and GPU hardware; Integration with the Python scientific software stack
It's interface is highly compatible with NumPy in most cases it can be used as a drop-in replacement; Supports various methods, indexing, data types, broadcasting and more; You can easily make a custom CUDA kernel if you want to make your code run faster, requiring only a small code snippet of C++; It automatically wraps and compiles it to make a CUDA binary; Compiled binaries are cached and reused in subsequent runs
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
10.6K
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
967
Stacks
20
Stacks
8
Followers
44
Followers
27
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
C++
C++
TensorFlow
TensorFlow
Python
Python
GraphPipe
GraphPipe
Ludwig
Ludwig
NumPy
NumPy
CUDA
CUDA

What are some alternatives to Numba, CuPy?

TensorFlow

TensorFlow

TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API.

scikit-learn

scikit-learn

scikit-learn is a Python module for machine learning built on top of SciPy and distributed under the 3-Clause BSD license.

PyTorch

PyTorch

PyTorch is not a Python binding into a monolothic C++ framework. It is built to be deeply integrated into Python. You can use it naturally like you would use numpy / scipy / scikit-learn etc.

Pandas

Pandas

Flexible and powerful data analysis / manipulation library for Python, providing labeled data structures similar to R data.frame objects, statistical functions, and much more.

Keras

Keras

Deep Learning library for Python. Convnets, recurrent neural networks, and more. Runs on TensorFlow or Theano. https://keras.io/

Kubeflow

Kubeflow

The Kubeflow project is dedicated to making Machine Learning on Kubernetes easy, portable and scalable by providing a straightforward way for spinning up best of breed OSS solutions.

TensorFlow.js

TensorFlow.js

Use flexible and intuitive APIs to build and train models from scratch using the low-level JavaScript linear algebra library or the high-level layers API

NumPy

NumPy

Besides its obvious scientific uses, NumPy can also be used as an efficient multi-dimensional container of generic data. Arbitrary data-types can be defined. This allows NumPy to seamlessly and speedily integrate with a wide variety of databases.

Polyaxon

Polyaxon

An enterprise-grade open source platform for building, training, and monitoring large scale deep learning applications.

Streamlit

Streamlit

It is the app framework specifically for Machine Learning and Data Science teams. You can rapidly build the tools you need. Build apps in a dozen lines of Python with a simple API.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase