StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. Crosswalk vs Electron

Crosswalk vs Electron

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Crosswalk
Crosswalk
Stacks16
Followers34
Votes6
GitHub Stars2.3K
Forks651
Electron
Electron
Stacks11.6K
Followers10.0K
Votes148

Crosswalk vs Electron: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Crosswalk and Electron.

1. **Implementation Language**: Crosswalk is built with C++ and includes a customized version of the Chromium browser, while Electron is built using Node.js and Chromium. This difference in implementation languages can impact performance, development experience, and maintenance requirements for developers.
2. **Size and Footprint**: Crosswalk tends to have a larger download size and memory footprint compared to Electron due to its inclusion of a full browser engine. This can affect the user experience, especially on devices with limited resources.
3. **Supported Platforms**: Crosswalk primarily targets Android and iOS platforms, offering a web runtime that can be embedded in mobile applications. On the other hand, Electron supports a wider range of platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it more versatile for desktop applications.
4. **Packaging and Distribution**: Electron provides tools like Electron Packager and asar to package and distribute applications, streamlining the deployment process for developers. Crosswalk, on the other hand, may require additional configurations and steps for packaging applications for different platforms.
5. **API Access**: Electron offers access to Node.js APIs for file system operations, networking, and other system-level interactions, giving developers more flexibility and power in building desktop applications. Crosswalk, while suitable for web-based mobile applications, may not provide the same level of access to native APIs on different platforms.
6. **Community and Ecosystem**: Electron boasts a larger community and ecosystem of plugins, libraries, and documentation compared to Crosswalk, which can be beneficial for developers seeking support, resources, and additional functionalities for their projects.

In Summary, Markdown code provides a comparison between Crosswalk and Electron, focusing on implementation language, size, supported platforms, packaging, API access, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Crosswalk
Crosswalk
Electron
Electron

Crosswalk is a web runtime for ambitious HTML5 applications. All the features of a modern browser, deep device integration and an API for adding native extensions

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Develop around device fragmentation;Provide a feature rich experience on all Android 4.x devices;Easily debug with Chrome DevTools;Improve the performance of your HTML, CSS, and JavaScript
Use HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Chromium and Node.js to build your app.;Electron is open source; maintained by GitHub and an active community.;Electron apps build and run on Mac, Windows, and Linux.;Automatic updates;Crash reporting;Windows installers;Debugging & profiling;Native menus & notifications
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
651
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
16
Stacks
11.6K
Followers
34
Followers
10.0K
Votes
6
Votes
148
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Essential for Android hybrid apps
  • 1
    New Modern Cordova
  • 1
    Hybrid desktop apps
  • 1
    Pretty decent solution to Android WebView issues
  • 1
    Improved performance
Pros
  • 69
    Easy to make rich cross platform desktop applications
  • 53
    Open source
  • 14
    Great looking apps such as Slack and Visual Studio Code
  • 8
    Because it's cross platform
  • 4
    Use Node.js in the Main Process
Cons
  • 19
    Uses a lot of memory
  • 8
    User experience never as good as a native app
  • 4
    No proper documentation
  • 4
    Does not native
  • 1
    Each app needs to install a new chromium + nodejs
Integrations
Android SDK
Android SDK
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Crosswalk, Electron?

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Qt

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Expo

Expo

It is a framework and a platform for universal React applications. It is a set of tools and services built around React Native and native platforms that help you develop, build, deploy, and quickly iterate on iOS, Android, and web apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase