Runcloud vs cPanel

Overview

cPanel

Stacks169

Followers129

Votes13

Runcloud

Stacks25

Followers69

Votes0

Runcloud vs cPanel: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In the world of web hosting, there are several control panels available to manage servers and websites. Two popular options are Runcloud and cPanel. While both serve the same purpose, they have some key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore these differences to help you make an informed decision based on your specific needs.

Deployment and Setup: Runcloud provides a quick and easy setup process with its user-friendly interface, allowing users to deploy their servers effortlessly. On the other hand, cPanel requires manual installation and configuration, which can be more time-consuming and complex.
User Interface: Runcloud offers a clean and sleek interface that is easy to navigate, even for beginners. It provides a streamlined experience with essential features readily accessible. In contrast, cPanel has a more traditional interface with a wide range of options and features, which can be overwhelming for newcomers.
Server Flexibility: Runcloud supports multiple cloud infrastructure providers, enabling users to choose their preferred platform, such as Amazon Web Services, DigitalOcean, or Google Cloud Platform. In contrast, cPanel is usually associated with specific hosting providers, limiting the choice of server infrastructure.
Pricing: Runcloud offers flexible pricing plans based on the number of servers, making it more cost-effective for smaller businesses or personal projects. cPanel, on the other hand, typically requires a fixed license fee, which can be more expensive, especially for hosting multiple servers.
Third-party Integration: Runcloud provides seamless integration with various third-party tools and services, such as Let's Encrypt for SSL certificates and GitHub for version control. cPanel also supports some integrations, but the options might be more limited compared to Runcloud.
System Resource Usage: Runcloud is known for its lightweight nature, consuming fewer system resources compared to cPanel. This efficiency ensures optimal server performance and allows for more efficient scaling. cPanel, being a more feature-rich control panel, might utilize more system resources, which can potentially impact the server's performance.

In summary, Runcloud offers a user-friendly interface, easy deployment, wider server infrastructure compatibility, cost-effective pricing, extensive third-party integration, and efficient system resource usage. On the other hand, cPanel provides a wide range of features and options that might be overwhelming for beginners, requires manual setup, and might be associated with specific hosting providers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

cPanel	Runcloud
It is an industry leading hosting platform with world-class support. It is globally empowering hosting providers through fully-automated point-and-click hosting platform by hosting-centric professionals	SaaS based PHP cloud server control panel. Support Digital Ocean, Linode, AWS, Vultr, Azure and other custom VPS. GIT deployment webhook and easiest control panel to manage Laravel, Cake, Symphony or WordPress.
-	Automate server configuration and security updates; Reliable storage to bring you peace of mind; Powerful use of git deployment for ZERO downtime guaranteed; Grant privileges for trusted users to manage your server
Statistics
Stacks 169	Stacks 25
Followers 129	Followers 69
Votes 13	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Documentation 3 Backups 2 Databases Management 2 Security 2 DNS Zone Editor Cons 2 Not free	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	DigitalOcean PHP Git Linode Vultr

What are some alternatives to cPanel, Runcloud?

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

Webmin

It is a web-based interface for system administration for Unix. Using any modern web browser, you can setup user accounts, Apache, DNS, file sharing and much more. It removes the need to manually edit Unix configuration files.

Mina

Mina works really fast because it's a deploy Bash script generator. It generates an entire procedure as a Bash script and runs it remotely in the server. Compare this to the likes of Vlad or Capistrano, where each command is run separately on their own SSH sessions. Mina only creates one SSH session per deploy, minimizing the SSH connection overhead.

Related Comparisons

Runcloud vs cPanel: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Deployment and Setup: Runcloud provides a quick and easy setup process with its user-friendly interface, allowing users to deploy their servers effortlessly. On the other hand, cPanel requires manual installation and configuration, which can be more time-consuming and complex.
User Interface: Runcloud offers a clean and sleek interface that is easy to navigate, even for beginners. It provides a streamlined experience with essential features readily accessible. In contrast, cPanel has a more traditional interface with a wide range of options and features, which can be overwhelming for newcomers.
Server Flexibility: Runcloud supports multiple cloud infrastructure providers, enabling users to choose their preferred platform, such as Amazon Web Services, DigitalOcean, or Google Cloud Platform. In contrast, cPanel is usually associated with specific hosting providers, limiting the choice of server infrastructure.
Pricing: Runcloud offers flexible pricing plans based on the number of servers, making it more cost-effective for smaller businesses or personal projects. cPanel, on the other hand, typically requires a fixed license fee, which can be more expensive, especially for hosting multiple servers.
Third-party Integration: Runcloud provides seamless integration with various third-party tools and services, such as Let's Encrypt for SSL certificates and GitHub for version control. cPanel also supports some integrations, but the options might be more limited compared to Runcloud.
System Resource Usage: Runcloud is known for its lightweight nature, consuming fewer system resources compared to cPanel. This efficiency ensures optimal server performance and allows for more efficient scaling. cPanel, being a more feature-rich control panel, might utilize more system resources, which can potentially impact the server's performance.

Runcloud vs cPanel

Overview