Corona SDK vs Flutter

Overview

Corona SDK

Stacks17

Followers37

Votes5

Flutter

Stacks17.7K

Followers16.8K

Votes1.2K

GitHub Stars173.7K

Forks29.4K

Corona SDK vs Flutter: What are the differences?

1. Language: Corona SDK uses Lua, a lightweight scripting language, for development. Lua is known for its simplicity, efficiency, and ease of learning. On the other hand, Flutter uses Dart, a language developed by Google specifically for building user interfaces. Dart is a modern language that includes features like strong typing and just-in-time compilation, making it suitable for large-scale applications.
2. Platform Support: Corona SDK primarily targets mobile platforms such as iOS and Android, allowing developers to create cross-platform apps with a single codebase. In contrast, Flutter is a cross-platform framework that supports various platforms, including mobile, web, and desktop. This versatility enables developers to build apps that run on multiple platforms using the same codebase.
3. UI Components and Customization: Corona SDK provides a set of built-in UI components and widgets for UI development, but its customization options are limited compared to Flutter. Flutter, on the other hand, offers a wide range of customizable UI components that can be tailored to match the desired look and feel of the app. It provides a flexible and powerful widget system, allowing developers to create custom UI elements easily.
4. Hot Reload and Development Experience: Both Corona SDK and Flutter support hot reload, enabling developers to see changes in real-time without restarting the app. However, Flutter's hot reload functionality is known for its speed and reliability, making the development process more efficient. It allows developers to experiment and iterate quickly, resulting in faster development cycles.
5. Performance and Native Experience: Corona SDK relies on the native platform libraries to provide access to device features and APIs, resulting in a native-like experience for the end-user. Flutter uses a different approach and includes its own set of UI components and rendering engine, which may introduce a slight overhead in terms of performance. However, Flutter's performance is optimized and can match or even exceed the native performance in many cases.
6. Community and Ecosystem: While both Corona SDK and Flutter have active developer communities, Flutter has gained significant popularity and momentum in recent years. It has a larger ecosystem with a wide range of libraries, plugins, and resources available for developers. Flutter's community is continuously growing, providing extensive support and documentation, making it easier for developers to find solutions and resources.

In Summary, Corona SDK uses Lua and primarily targets mobile platforms, providing a simpler UI customization but limited platform support, while Flutter uses Dart and supports various platforms, offering a highly customizable UI, efficient hot reload, competitive performance, and a more extensive community and ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Corona SDK, Flutter

Nick

CTO at Pickio

Jun 2, 2020

Decided

We built the first version of our app with RN and it turned out a mess in a while. A lot of bugs along with poor performance out of the box for a fairly large app. Many things, that native platform has, cannot be done with existing solutions for RN. For instance, large titles on iOS are not fully implemented in any of existing navigations libraries. Also there's painfully slow JSON bridge and many other small, yet annoying things. On the other hand Flutter became a really powerful and easy-to-use tool. A bit of a learning curve, of course, because of Dart, but it worth learning. Flutter offers TONS of built-in features, no JSON-bridge, AOT compilation for iOS.

491k views491k

Comments

Anonymous

CEO at ME!

Jun 7, 2020

Decided

While with Ionic it is possible to make mobile applications with only web technologies, Flutter is more performant and is easy to use if you are willing to learn Dart, which is a fun language. Plus, it has awesome documentation and, while its ecosystem isn't near as big as JavaScript's is, it has a good package manager called Pub and its packages are generally high quality.

403k views403k

Comments

Thuan

FE Lead at SOLID ENGINEER

Jun 16, 2020

Decided

Javascripts is the most populated language in the world.
Easy to learn & deployed production
Fast development
Strong community
Completed Documents
Native performance with lower RAM used.
Easy to handle native issues by using native code like Java / Objective C
Powered by Facebook.

666k views666k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Corona SDK	Flutter
It is a cross-platform framework ideal for rapidly creating apps and games for mobile devices and desktop systems. It builds rich mobile apps for iOS, Android, Kindle and Nook. Build high quality mobile apps in a fraction of the time.	Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.
Call any native library; Cross-platform; Completely free	Fast development - Flutter's "hot reload" helps you quickly and easily experiment, build UIs, add features, and fix bug faster. Experience sub-second reload times, without losing state, on emulators, simulators, and hardware for iOS and Android.;Expressive UIs - Delight your users with Flutter's built-in beautiful Material Design and Cupertino (iOS-flavor) widgets, rich motion APIs, smooth natural scrolling, and platform awareness.;Access native features and SDKs - Make your app come to life with platform APIs, 3rd party SDKs, and native code. Flutter lets you reuse your existing Java, Swift, and ObjC code, and access native features and SDKs on iOS and Android.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 173.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 29.4K
Stacks 17	Stacks 17.7K
Followers 37	Followers 16.8K
Votes 5	Votes 1.2K
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Also potentially build for OS Apple 2 Lua code better than java code Cons 4 Not Very popular 2 Very Poor System	Pros 149 Hot Reload 126 Cross platform 107 Performance 90 Backed by Google 74 Compiled into Native Code Cons 29 Need to learn Dart 11 Lack of community support 10 No 3D Graphics Engine Support 8 Graphics programming 6 Lack of friendly documentation
Integrations
Google AdMob JetBrains Rider PlayFab Lua Vuforia TestFairy Pushwoosh Helpshift	Android SDK Firebase Dart

What are some alternatives to Corona SDK, Flutter?

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Unity

Unity is the ultimate game development platform. Use Unity to build high-quality 3D and 2D games, deploy them across mobile, desktop, VR/AR, consoles or the Web, and connect with loyal and enthusiastic players and customers.

Expo

It is a framework and a platform for universal React applications. It is a set of tools and services built around React Native and native platforms that help you develop, build, deploy, and quickly iterate on iOS, Android, and web apps.

Related Comparisons

Corona SDK vs Flutter: What are the differences?

1. Language: Corona SDK uses Lua, a lightweight scripting language, for development. Lua is known for its simplicity, efficiency, and ease of learning. On the other hand, Flutter uses Dart, a language developed by Google specifically for building user interfaces. Dart is a modern language that includes features like strong typing and just-in-time compilation, making it suitable for large-scale applications.
2. Platform Support: Corona SDK primarily targets mobile platforms such as iOS and Android, allowing developers to create cross-platform apps with a single codebase. In contrast, Flutter is a cross-platform framework that supports various platforms, including mobile, web, and desktop. This versatility enables developers to build apps that run on multiple platforms using the same codebase.
3. UI Components and Customization: Corona SDK provides a set of built-in UI components and widgets for UI development, but its customization options are limited compared to Flutter. Flutter, on the other hand, offers a wide range of customizable UI components that can be tailored to match the desired look and feel of the app. It provides a flexible and powerful widget system, allowing developers to create custom UI elements easily.
4. Hot Reload and Development Experience: Both Corona SDK and Flutter support hot reload, enabling developers to see changes in real-time without restarting the app. However, Flutter's hot reload functionality is known for its speed and reliability, making the development process more efficient. It allows developers to experiment and iterate quickly, resulting in faster development cycles.
5. Performance and Native Experience: Corona SDK relies on the native platform libraries to provide access to device features and APIs, resulting in a native-like experience for the end-user. Flutter uses a different approach and includes its own set of UI components and rendering engine, which may introduce a slight overhead in terms of performance. However, Flutter's performance is optimized and can match or even exceed the native performance in many cases.
6. Community and Ecosystem: While both Corona SDK and Flutter have active developer communities, Flutter has gained significant popularity and momentum in recent years. It has a larger ecosystem with a wide range of libraries, plugins, and resources available for developers. Flutter's community is continuously growing, providing extensive support and documentation, making it easier for developers to find solutions and resources.

Corona SDK vs Flutter

Overview