Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Confluence

25.9K
18.9K
+ 1
202
MediaWiki

176
86
+ 1
0
Add tool

Confluence vs MediaWiki: What are the differences?

  1. Ease of Use: Confluence is known for its user-friendly interface and easy-to-use WYSIWYG editor, making it more approachable for non-technical users. On the other hand, MediaWiki has a steeper learning curve due to its markup language editing style, which may be challenging for those unfamiliar with wiki syntax.

  2. Customization Options: Confluence offers more customization options, templates, and plugins out of the box, allowing users to tailor their wiki to specific requirements without the need for extensive technical knowledge. MediaWiki, while highly customizable, may require additional technical expertise or development skills to achieve similar levels of customization and functionality.

  3. Pricing and Licensing: Confluence is a commercial product offered by Atlassian, with pricing based on the number of users and additional features included in different plans. MediaWiki, on the other hand, is open-source and free to use, with no licensing fees, making it a more cost-effective solution for organizations on a budget.

  4. Security Features: Confluence provides advanced security features such as granular permissions, encryption options, and integration with single sign-on (SSO) providers to ensure data privacy and protection. MediaWiki also offers security measures but may require additional plugins or configurations to reach the same level of security as Confluence.

  5. Support and Community: Confluence users benefit from Atlassian's customer support, documentation, and a large community of users for troubleshooting and best practices. MediaWiki, being open-source, relies heavily on its community for support, updates, and development, which may not offer the same level of dedicated assistance as a commercial product like Confluence.

  6. Scalability and Performance: Confluence is designed to handle large amounts of content and users efficiently, making it suitable for enterprises with extensive documentation needs. While MediaWiki can also scale effectively, additional optimizations and configurations may be required for high traffic or data-intensive environments.

In Summary, Confluence excels in ease of use, customization options, and support, while MediaWiki offers cost-effective pricing, security measures, and a robust community for collaborative development.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Confluence
Pros of MediaWiki
  • 94
    Wiki search power
  • 62
    WYSIWYG editor
  • 43
    Full featured, works well with embedded docs
  • 3
    Expensive licenses
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Confluence
    Cons of MediaWiki
    • 3
      Expensive license
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is Confluence?

      Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.

      What is MediaWiki?

      It is a free server-based software. It is an extremely powerful, scalable software and a feature-rich wiki implementation that uses PHP to process and display data stored in a database, such as MySQL.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Confluence?
      What companies use MediaWiki?
      See which teams inside your own company are using Confluence or MediaWiki.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Confluence?
      What tools integrate with MediaWiki?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      What are some alternatives to Confluence and MediaWiki?
      GitLab
      GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
      Jira
      Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster.
      Microsoft SharePoint
      It empowers teamwork with dynamic and productive team sites for every project team, department, and division. Share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and seamlessly collaborate across the organization.
      Basecamp
      Basecamp is a project management and group collaboration tool. The tool includes features for schedules, tasks, files, and messages.
      Slack
      Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.
      See all alternatives