Confluence vs MediaWiki

Overview

Confluence

Stacks26.6K

Followers19.5K

Votes202

MediaWiki

Stacks178

Followers88

Votes0

Confluence vs MediaWiki: What are the differences?

Ease of Use: Confluence is known for its user-friendly interface and easy-to-use WYSIWYG editor, making it more approachable for non-technical users. On the other hand, MediaWiki has a steeper learning curve due to its markup language editing style, which may be challenging for those unfamiliar with wiki syntax.
Customization Options: Confluence offers more customization options, templates, and plugins out of the box, allowing users to tailor their wiki to specific requirements without the need for extensive technical knowledge. MediaWiki, while highly customizable, may require additional technical expertise or development skills to achieve similar levels of customization and functionality.
Pricing and Licensing: Confluence is a commercial product offered by Atlassian, with pricing based on the number of users and additional features included in different plans. MediaWiki, on the other hand, is open-source and free to use, with no licensing fees, making it a more cost-effective solution for organizations on a budget.
Security Features: Confluence provides advanced security features such as granular permissions, encryption options, and integration with single sign-on (SSO) providers to ensure data privacy and protection. MediaWiki also offers security measures but may require additional plugins or configurations to reach the same level of security as Confluence.
Support and Community: Confluence users benefit from Atlassian's customer support, documentation, and a large community of users for troubleshooting and best practices. MediaWiki, being open-source, relies heavily on its community for support, updates, and development, which may not offer the same level of dedicated assistance as a commercial product like Confluence.
Scalability and Performance: Confluence is designed to handle large amounts of content and users efficiently, making it suitable for enterprises with extensive documentation needs. While MediaWiki can also scale effectively, additional optimizations and configurations may be required for high traffic or data-intensive environments.

In Summary, Confluence excels in ease of use, customization options, and support, while MediaWiki offers cost-effective pricing, security measures, and a robust community for collaborative development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Confluence, MediaWiki

Michael

Software Engineer

May 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Confluence

Google Docs

Hello community, I am looking for a self-hosted online document management solution. One that covers all my needs is Confluence but it is currently not affordable for my team. Key requirements are RTL support, WYSIWYG Editing (Word-like interface as much as possible), Concurrent Editing (the best experience I have with Google Docs where I can even see who else is currently editing a document) with conflict resolution, versioning (view history and switch between versions), PDF and Word export, complex tables, and some others, full list here in column "A". I found XWIKI covering all my requirements (including those "bonus features" that I didn't list here) except one - RTL. Here a hack is suggested to address this issues but I would prefer not to go with any hacks. I myself am ready to contribute to an open source development but other people who (hopefully) will use this tool are not software engineers and this fact must be kept in mind... Any suggestions are greatly appreciated!

62k views62k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Confluence	MediaWiki
Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.	It is a free server-based software. It is an extremely powerful, scalable software and a feature-rich wiki implementation that uses PHP to process and display data stored in a database, such as MySQL.
Spaces;Pages;Editor;Macros;Tasks;Attachments;Notifications;Search;Mobile;JIRA Integration;Installation;Customize;Personal;Security	-
Statistics
Stacks 26.6K	Stacks 178
Followers 19.5K	Followers 88
Votes 202	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 94 Wiki search power 62 WYSIWYG editor 43 Full featured, works well with embedded docs 3 Expensive licenses Cons 3 Expensive license	No community feedback yet
Integrations
GitLab Bitbucket GitHub Google Drive Balsamiq Jira Gliffy	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Confluence, MediaWiki?

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

Asana

Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.

Basecamp

Basecamp is a project management and group collaboration tool. The tool includes features for schedules, tasks, files, and messages.

Redmine

Redmine is a flexible project management web application. Written using the Ruby on Rails framework, it is cross-platform and cross-database.

Taskulu

Taskulu is a collaborative project planning service. It combines task management, real-time chat and time tracking into a single interface.

Notion

A new tool that blends your everyday work apps into one. It's a unified and collaborative workspace for you and your team

Aha!

Set product strategy, visualize and share roadmaps, and articulate features so your product development teams can build what matters.

Ora

Ora enables you to customize your projects and collaborate the way you want! Choose an existing methodology or create your own. Ora has everything your team might need to boost productivity and collaborate! Task management, kanban, lists...

Shortcut

Shortcut combines a simple, modern UI with enterprise-grade tools, allowing technology companies to plan and manage their projects effectively, visualize progress across the organization, and define deadlines and milestones based upon data.

Related Comparisons

Confluence vs MediaWiki: What are the differences?

Ease of Use: Confluence is known for its user-friendly interface and easy-to-use WYSIWYG editor, making it more approachable for non-technical users. On the other hand, MediaWiki has a steeper learning curve due to its markup language editing style, which may be challenging for those unfamiliar with wiki syntax.
Customization Options: Confluence offers more customization options, templates, and plugins out of the box, allowing users to tailor their wiki to specific requirements without the need for extensive technical knowledge. MediaWiki, while highly customizable, may require additional technical expertise or development skills to achieve similar levels of customization and functionality.
Pricing and Licensing: Confluence is a commercial product offered by Atlassian, with pricing based on the number of users and additional features included in different plans. MediaWiki, on the other hand, is open-source and free to use, with no licensing fees, making it a more cost-effective solution for organizations on a budget.
Security Features: Confluence provides advanced security features such as granular permissions, encryption options, and integration with single sign-on (SSO) providers to ensure data privacy and protection. MediaWiki also offers security measures but may require additional plugins or configurations to reach the same level of security as Confluence.
Support and Community: Confluence users benefit from Atlassian's customer support, documentation, and a large community of users for troubleshooting and best practices. MediaWiki, being open-source, relies heavily on its community for support, updates, and development, which may not offer the same level of dedicated assistance as a commercial product like Confluence.
Scalability and Performance: Confluence is designed to handle large amounts of content and users efficiently, making it suitable for enterprises with extensive documentation needs. While MediaWiki can also scale effectively, additional optimizations and configurations may be required for high traffic or data-intensive environments.

Confluence vs MediaWiki

Overview