StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. CodeIgniter vs Material Design for Angular

CodeIgniter vs Material Design for Angular

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
Stacks3.2K
Followers1.5K
Votes466
Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Stacks11.8K
Followers9.6K
Votes522
GitHub Stars16.5K
Forks3.4K

CodeIgniter vs Material Design for Angular: What are the differences?

CodeIgniter: A Fully Baked PHP Framework. CodeIgniter is a proven, agile & open PHP web application framework with a small footprint. It is powering the next generation of web apps; Material Design for Angular: Material Design for AngularJS Apps. Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

CodeIgniter and Material Design for Angular are primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" and "Front-End Frameworks" tools respectively.

"Mvc" is the primary reason why developers consider CodeIgniter over the competitors, whereas "Ui components" was stated as the key factor in picking Material Design for Angular.

CodeIgniter and Material Design for Angular are both open source tools. It seems that CodeIgniter with 17.4K GitHub stars and 7.71K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Material Design for Angular with 16.5K GitHub stars and 3.57K GitHub forks.

Movielala, Bannerman, and inFeedo are some of the popular companies that use Material Design for Angular, whereas CodeIgniter is used by Webedia, Die Coder GmbH, and Manchester.com. Material Design for Angular has a broader approval, being mentioned in 279 company stacks & 369 developers stacks; compared to CodeIgniter, which is listed in 259 company stacks and 102 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on CodeIgniter, Material Design for Angular

Ajeet
Ajeet

Dec 16, 2019

Needs advice

Hi, We are thinking to rebuild a website and need your suggestion on which platform to choose from NodeJs, Laravel & CodeIgnitor. Since it's an education base website and there will be multiple functionalities like the use of graphics, video, animation and off-course forms for lead generation. Please advise us which tool to use to build the website considering load-time, server security, code vulnerability, etc.

216k views216k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular

CodeIgniter is a proven, agile & open PHP web application framework with a small footprint. It is powering the next generation of web apps.

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
16.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.4K
Stacks
3.2K
Stacks
11.8K
Followers
1.5K
Followers
9.6K
Votes
466
Votes
522
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 88
    Mvc
  • 76
    Easy setup
  • 70
    Open source
  • 62
    Well documented
  • 36
    Community support
Cons
  • 6
    No ORM
  • 1
    No CLI
Pros
  • 122
    Ui components
  • 63
    Backed by google
  • 51
    Backed by angular
  • 51
    Free
  • 47
    Javascript
Cons
  • 4
    No practical examples
Integrations
PHP
PHP
AngularJS
AngularJS

What are some alternatives to CodeIgniter, Material Design for Angular?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase