Code Climate vs Coveralls

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Code Climate

+ 1

+ 1
Add tool

Code Climate vs Coveralls: What are the differences?

Key differences between Code Climate and Coveralls

  1. Code Climate: Code Climate is a popular static analysis platform that focuses on helping developers improve the quality of their code. It provides a wide range of features, including code review, code coverage, and code duplication analysis. Code Climate offers extensive support for different programming languages and integrations with various source code repositories, making it a versatile tool for developers to identify and address code quality issues.

  2. Coveralls: Coveralls, on the other hand, is a code coverage analysis tool that specifically focuses on tracking how much of a codebase is covered by tests. It offers integration with popular testing libraries and continuous integration tools, making it easy for developers to monitor code coverage during the development process. Coveralls provides detailed reports on which parts of the code are covered by tests, allowing developers to identify areas that require additional testing and improve overall test coverage.

  3. Cost: While both Code Climate and Coveralls offer free plans with limited features, the pricing models for their premium plans differ. Code Climate offers a tiered pricing model based on the organization's size and the number of repositories being analyzed. Coveralls, on the other hand, offers a flat pricing structure based solely on the number of repositories being analyzed. Depending on the size and specific needs of the organization, this difference in pricing models may influence the choice between the two tools.

  4. Additional features: Code Climate places a strong emphasis on providing a comprehensive code review experience, offering features such as automated code style enforcement and security vulnerability scanning. Coveralls, on the other hand, primarily focuses on code coverage analysis, providing features such as test suite integration and real-time coverage tracking. The choice between Code Climate and Coveralls may depend on the specific needs of the development team and the importance placed on code review versus code coverage analysis.

  5. Integration and compatibility: Both Code Climate and Coveralls offer integrations with popular version control systems and continuous integration tools. However, the extent of the integrations and compatibility may vary. Code Climate provides a wide range of integrations and supports a variety of programming languages, making it suitable for diverse development environments. Coveralls, while also offering integrations, may have more limited language compatibility. It is important to consider the specific needs and technologies used in the development process when choosing between the two tools.

  6. User interface and experience: Code Climate and Coveralls have different user interfaces and experiences. Code Climate offers a visually appealing, intuitive dashboard that provides comprehensive insights into the codebase's quality. It allows developers to easily navigate through the various analysis reports and track progress over time. Coveralls, on the other hand, offers a simpler interface focused on displaying code coverage metrics and test results. The choice between the two tools may depend on the desired level of visual presentation and ease of use for the development team.

In summary, Code Climate is a versatile code analysis platform with a strong focus on code review and quality improvement, while Coveralls is a dedicated code coverage analysis tool. The choice between the two tools depends on factors such as cost, specific needs in code review or coverage analysis, integrations, and user experience preferences.

Decisions about Code Climate and Coveralls

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container. Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website. This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Code Climate
Pros of Coveralls
  • 71
    Auto sync with Github
  • 49
    Simple grade system that motivates to keep code clean
  • 45
    Better coding
  • 30
    Free for open source
  • 21
    Hotspots for quick refactoring candidates
  • 15
    Continued encouragement to a have better / cleaner code
  • 13
    Great UI
  • 11
    Makes you a better coder
  • 10
    Duplication Detection
  • 5
    Safe and Secure
  • 2
  • 2
    Extremely accurate in telling you the errors
  • 2
    GitHub only
  • 2
    Python inspection
  • 2
    Great open community
  • 2
    GitHub integration, status inline in PRs
  • 2
    Uses rubocop
  • 1
    Locally Installable API
  • 45
    Free for public repositories
  • 13
    Code coverage
  • 7
    Ease of integration
  • 2
    More stable than Codecov
  • 1
    Combines coverage from multiple/parallel test runs

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Code Climate
Cons of Coveralls
  • 2
    Learning curve, static analysis comparable to eslint
  • 1
    Complains about small stylistic decisions
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Code Climate?

    After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

    What is Coveralls?

    Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Code Climate?
    What companies use Coveralls?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Code Climate or Coveralls.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Code Climate?
    What tools integrate with Coveralls?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to Code Climate and Coveralls?
    Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.
    Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.
    SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.
    GitPrime uses data from GitHub, GitLab, BitBucket—or any Git based code repository—to help engineering leaders move faster, optimize work patterns, and advocate for engineering with concrete data.
    RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.
    See all alternatives